Posted by a.j.w. [aw] on March 29, 1999 at 06:08:47 {9b2GZPq.rkgCnTAgEi3MMWDeyTkGBtHIU}:
In Reply to: *Known to be Untrue posted by Moderator 14 on March 28, 1999 at 20:53:25:
Oh,
Welcome to the discussion M14.
: There is a difference in 'presence' and 'receiving kingly power.'
is this a strawman or what? COMF's post was about the supposed "second presence" chiefly.
I think COMF would appreciate your frankness in demonstrating the Organization's acceptance and understanding of it's poor history in setting dates.
You have not however addressed COMF's point: in a number of articles COMF quoted - go back to his post and work through it piece by piece - the Society has been frugal with the brutal honesty that you speak of. This is especially so, as you have amply proven that they knew the real facts (or at least could take them out for a spin (as in Dr.) if needed)
COMF's point is not that the Society may be villians, but that practicus needs to recognise that if a much lesser and unproven dishonesty on the part of the promoters of H2O is enough to call them liars, then the society should be called liars too.
As practicus and M14 refuse to do this, the hat fits - wear it with pride: "detestable to Jehovah".
Love,
Andrew.