Total
expenditures of the municipality consistently increase
from 1993 to 1995, that is by 38% between 1993 to 1994
and by 16% for 1994 and 1995. Comparing with the total
financial resources for the last three years, the town
has evidently incurred savings approximately 75% to 77%
then finally 79%, respectively, of the total income
earned for the same years.
For analysis
purposes, expenditures were classified according to
function, that is expenses used for operations
(administrative) and expenses used for direct services
to the population (Public Service). This is to determine
which of the two functions is given emphasis by the
municipality and thereby assess if there is
over-allocation of funds. Listing of said expenses are
shown in Table 50.2
The
denominating operational expenses were those of General
Government. This consist of General Administration and
Government Finance. General Administration are expenses
incurred by the Office of the Local Chief Executive,
Municipal Planning and Development Coordinator, Local
Sanggunian and Administrative supervision of the
Department of Interior and Local Government.
The
municipality does not operate any economic enterprise,
thus no expenses incurred.
Inter-government aids are municipal government's
aids to barangays at 1,000 each.
Transfers are
funds transferred to other levels of government as
calamity funds as reflected only in 1993. No recorded
transfers in two others years.
Capital
outlays are expenses incurred for office materials and
equipments.
Budgetary
reserves are mandatory reserves are mandatory reserve as
directed by higher level government units.
In terms of
public service expenditures, it consist of two
expenditure particulars: public welfare and economic
development. Public welfare includes adjudications which
are expenses incurred by the Fiscal's Office, Municipal
Courts, Courts of First instance, register of deeds,
courts of agrarian reform and other courts; Prospective
Services which are expenses incurred by division of
schools, provincial warden, auxiliary service library,
municipal high school, POPCOM and Municipal Social
Welfare Development Office. Economic Development consist
of expenses incurred by the Municipal Agricultural
Office, the 20% Developmnt Fund projects, continuing
appropriation, sports and development. Municipal
Veterinarian, Engineers Office, Brgy. Development
Projects Radio-Telecom Systems and others.
It can be
noted that the Administrative Expenditure Percentage is
higher that the Service Expenditure Percentage in all of
three years. This means that the municipal government of
Kalayaan is spending more for its constituents. However,
it should also be noted that the AEP is decreasing while
SEP is increasing. This shows that the government is on
the right track performing its functions of attending to
the needs of the population. Gradually, expenditures is
directed towards public service and welfare.
TABLE
50.2 COMPARATIVE EXPENDITURE FUNCTION 1993 -
1995
FUNCTION |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
I.
Administrative Function |
|
|
|
1.
General Government 2. Operation of Economic
Enterprise 3. Inter Government Aids 4. Loans
and Advances 5. Transfers Calamity Fund 6.
Capital Outlays 7. Budgetary
Reserve
|
P
3,358,041.41
- 3,000.00 - 109,914.00 33,680.00 - |
P
3,966,717.18
- 3,000.00 - - 155,000.00 - |
P
4,600,238.00
- 3,000.00 - - - - |
Sub-total |
P
3,497,635.41 |
P
4,124,717.18 |
- |
Administrative Expenditure Percentage
(AEP)
|
72%
|
62%
|
60%
|
I. Public
Service Function 1. Public Welfare 2.
Economic Development
|
P
765,210.31 562,708.57
|
P
965,477.79 1,598,728.36
|
P
1,410,345.00 1,716,634.00
|
Sub-total |
P
1,327,918.88 |
P
2,564,206.15 |
P
3,126,979.00 |
Service Expenditure Percentage
(SEP)
|
28%
|
38%
|
40%
|
Total |
P
4,825,554.29 |
P
6,688,923.33 |
P
7,746,217.00 |
% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|