abstract:  The Big Bang was really a Big "Slow" Bang.

Well, we have a  problem.  Already yet, there is a problem.  

S N O T - B
The First Amendment to the snot standard model.

The original idea of an gravitational collapse resulting in 
a full power repulsive distribution event might be a tad 
off.  Well, might be a tad or more off.  ahem...
 (repeat worse swearword)

It seems that as the mass causing the gravitational 
pressures goes up and up, the resulting cubic warped 
spacetime (gravitational) linkage is pushed internally past 
one another and further and further away from optimum 
linkage.

Restating:  The sigma generated warped spacetime (gravity) 
from the theoretical gravitons is reduced slowly as the 
cubic linking endpoints are pushed further and further 
inward and away from each other which reduce the net 
strength of linkage and therefore its ability to warp 
spacetime.

The usual g=1/d^2 starts flexing its muscles and Sigma 
gravity gradually goes from additive gravity to to a 
weakening to ZERO gravity to a mild repulsive condition to a 
maximum repulsive condition.

So what has this all got to do with a repulsive event?  

Well, the "exploding" velocity of the "big bang" is much 
less than it would be if it were a full fledged theoretical 
maximum repulsive powered event.

As the gravitational generation lessens in the areas of most 
pressure, specifically, internally near the center, what 
starts up the "big slow bang" is the compressed nature of 
the quantum components themselves wanting to resume a 
spherical shape as the linkage themselves haven't even 
reached the repulsive state yet.

In fact, it is questionable whether it ever does as the full 
force repulsive additive event would generate "exploding" 
velocities approaching perhaps c velocity and an egg shell 
type configuration of mass distribution.  Our cosmos doesn't 
appear to have a near c velocity distribution pattern.

Now we know that the "exploding" "charge" velocities are 
much less than that.

So, given a certain hypermass internal pressure, due to a 
hypermass amount of mass/energy, we can guess or deduce a 
"less than" condition of an "exploding" "big bang" velocity 
really amounts to a "big slow bang" event.

The issue of velocities over times and distances i have to 
leave to the real experts.

The theory is that our own cosmos is a fine example of a 
non-repulsive "big slow bang event".  without thinking too 
much about it (joseph_sixpacks never think too much about 
it.) expansion velocities may be around in the millions 
miles per hour mark.  don't know... i'll figure it out 
later. ...just a long division problem anyhow.

But remember, all the above bang baloney is dependent upon 
the red shifts as NOT being "tired" light gravitationally 
drawn down in energy.

Do Joe's know anything for sure?  Yeah, right...

None of the above crap makes a whit of difference to our 
pathetically dependent species anyhow.  Cosmology appears to 
be totally functionless knowledge.  We just have to humbly 
and resignedly accept our "paramecium in a puddle of water" 
status and humbly live life as it is offered to us and die 
on schedule while not pissing in our puddle too much so that 
we can share our puddle down thru time with our 
grandchildren's grandchildren..

Knowledge that does NOT promote love and kindness among our 
species should be examined very closely anyhow for true 
usefulness.  a culture of technology with its values has to 
be fully examined and weighed against a culture of 
spirituality with its values.  The plow is nice.  but not if 
the plow kills the planet.

i don't know.  i don't have any answers.  by me...

it is depressing, being a tad so stupid...

time for my nap.

End of first amendment to the "Snot Standard Model".

S N O T - C
The Second Amendment to the snot standard model.

Well, the question came up as to why i thought the velocity 
of mass from a fully charged repulsive "big bang" event from 
a hypermassive object would approach c.

Now, keep in mind that the first amendment to the snot 
standard model discusses that a fully charged repulsive 
event would not occur.  The "normal" big bang event would 
generate only a bare fraction of c velocity.

Looking at the warped spacetime generated by a hypermassive 
object we can deduce that the additive gravity from the 
compressed, now cubic gravitons exceeds by far any possible 
escape velocity that mass can obtain as it is currently 
agreed (i don't agree but that is another subject beyond a 
joseph_sixpacks mind.) with event horizons being far, far 
out from the warped spacetime generating mass.

The repulsive component of a hypermassive warped spacetime 
object should be equal in "power" to the gravitational 
component when it comes to its field generating capacity.  
sooooo....

If the graviton linkage is pushed pass and into the 
repulsive state, similar power, albeit in reverse, is 
produced.

Personally, i think a full power repulsive blast if it could 
occur, and according to a joseph_sixpack it can't, would 
push mass out in EXCESS of c.  which as you know is not a 
popular velocity.  Now any radiation within the blast would 
have to putt-putt out at c as that is as fast as the little 
humpmobiles can travel hooked to the massless underlinkage 
which controls the velocity of all radiation. (pardon, but i 
had to get my linked underlayer commercial in... :-)

Such a full power repulsive blast would create an "eggshell" 
thickness of matter ever enlarging in space that would be 
about equal the radius of the hypermassive object that 
banged.  Presently that doesn't seem to be the case within 
our cosmos.

What does seem the case looking at the somewhat even mass 
distribution is that the "resistance to compression" into a 
cubic form was the energy that was used in any and all "big 
bangs", past, present or future.  In other words, our little 
basketballs wanted to get round again.  Outgoing velocities 
would be in the slower millions of distances per unit time.

All bets are off however, if two, three, four, five, six, 
seven or eight hypermassive objects come together at once at 
gravitational speeds appropriate to their mass.  I can't 
even imagine the result.  Now that might be a pressure 
induced full power repulsive big bang.  don't be there.

Mass over large distances would seem to indicate a 
continuous, somewhat slowing distribution as things get 
repulsed with less and less energy.


Return to your place in the Snot Standard Model