Magnetar Field Strength Hypothesis
Yet another hypothesis by
Joseph_Sixpack
Go to Frankenbook's INDEX
Back to the Table of Contents
Abstract:
The magnetar's field strength is generated by the extreme gravity
effects upon the quantum particle (waveform) that generates the
magnetic fields. The "mechanics" of gravitational compression
"squeeze" mass into a cubic form enabling near perfect linkage
for the generation of magnetic and gravitational fields.
yeah right...
Well, this topic deals with the Magnetar and the mechanics
of the particle physics involved in generating the huge
magnetic fields that surround them.
Fields are extensions of energy/mass or mass/energy if you
prefer. So for every particle/waveform/resonance, there is
a "field" effect. Perhaps different for each one, perhaps
not... The magnetic field is no exception, it is caused by
the "fill in the empty blank" (particle/ waveform/
resonance/ string/).
Now, if you haven't read the Snot
Standard Model yet for a particle configuration
hypothesis for waveforms/resonances/ particles under ultra
high gravitational pressures, i suggest you do so now
because the explanations for the generation of high gravity
and high magnetic fields are pretty much the same.
What is suggested here is that the same high pressure cubic
compression events that cause gravitation to increase
massively, cause a similiar increase in the power of the
magnetic polar linkage to increase in magnetic power as
well.
Repulsive Event cancels gauss generation too?
Now all we have to consider is whether or not there might be
a similiar repulsive magnetic event awaiting the ever
increasing warped spacetime matter and therefore ever
increasing pressures regarding the magnetic elements of the
mass in question.
What is the net physical effect of a massively collapsed
magnetic repulsive event in a magnetar? If any can even
occur, which it semms to me, that it can.
What happens to what?
Does the magnetic field just slip away?
Oooze gradually down the gauss scale?
Does it gradually "reverse" when gravitational pressures
cause the cubic geometry to push the polar magnetic elements
(string resonances) past one another and therefore too close
together to have an additive effect?
Will ever increasing mass in a neutron star or larger ever
render ineffective the increase in the magnetic field?
Gravitational repulsion is a tad different than magnetic
repulsion. And what of black holes and magnetic fields?
It's obvious that we can't get too close to this thing with
tin buttons on our shirt and our ferro-cement spaceship is
going to have to go to 303 stainless instead of iron to
avoid being picked up by any magnetar and its fields close
by and accelerated to either a north or south pole location
in a hurry.
Well, for now, let's just leave it at that...
Except for one more point:
This magnetar business, well... it seems to me to add
credibility to the "cubic" geometric form of mass/energy
under conditions of ultra high gravitation. The Magnetar
phenomenon is found "only" in high gravitation conditions
where the particle resonances along the diagonal are
increased in efficiency.
(neutron stars)
restating:
Both polar type fields (gravity and magnetism) appear to
alter their field strength dramatically under high
gravitational pressures indicating perhaps a condition of
increased efficiency in field generation properties which
appears to be forfilled by mass/energy taking on a cubic
geometry under high gravitation conditions .
The magnetar and the black hole have a lot in common.
Now how can we find incidents of high gauss in small, medium,
large "black hole class" mass/energy objects?
time for my nap...
Go to TOP of Page
Back to the Index
Go to the Table of Contents