"Missing" Dark Matter Revisited
Yet Another Series of Dark Matter Hypotheses
by Joseph_Sixpack
TOC
Index
Abstract: Okay, here is Joseph Sixpack's hypotheses:
There is no missing matter in the universe. Nor does
missing matter consist of a strange new unfound particle.
There is just simple dirt in the Cosmos.
Dirt, and just dirt, composed of all the periodic table of
things under the sun that dirt is composed of. Hydrogen,
Helium and etc., etc. Lots and lots of dirt.
The Missing Matter is all contained within billions and
billions of small, medium, large, massive, very massive,
supermassive, hypermassive, radiation retaining objects.
These black holes are more numerous than the grains of sand
in the Sahara Desert.
In addition, there are huge, huge amounts of ever smaller
masses, smaller than even the smallest grain of talcum
powder. Let's call them then, vast areas of chunky gases.
These are just pinpoints of mass. To paraphrase Dr. Sagan,
"quadrillions and quadrillions" of them.
Then there is radiation... an ungodly amount, zipping and
zinging throughout the cosmos, generated from the processes
from pressured mass. An enormous amount of radiation of all
frequencies.
In short, dirt and superdirt.
Occasionally, two or more black holes slip or traverse into
each others spacetime warpage, and are mutually attracted or
drawn towards each other, at ever increasing velocities.
For the other black hole masses, they yet stand and remain
alone with their own spacetime depression (gravity) and
resulting event horizon. Some may just be in the very
earliest stages of just beginning to creep towards each
other, a process that may take many millions of years.
We'll leave that one to the mathematicians.
According to Joe's hypothesis, as the two or more
supermasses accelerate towards one another, down towards
each others now "bent and depressed rubber sheet", great
amounts of mass are set free due to gravitational
acceleration forces that would be increasing as they speed
towards one another to collision or binary orbit.
As the objects leave behind (loose) mass at fixed x, y
vectors during the acceleration process towards one another,
the distribution of left behind matter is at the ever
lessening x, y vectors until they go into either a final
binary orbit if offset, or merge directly, if on collision
course.
The pinwheel orbits of galaxies are not gravitationally
established in the solar sense, but are the results of a
high speed distribution of mass.
It's chunky and lumpy, with a velocity like garbage falling
out of of a garbage truck gradually accelerating downhill
while on a steep ever tightening curve.
The final orbiting or spinning remnants of the binary
closure, now exhausted of much, if not nearly most of their
earlier mass, are now all that now exists at the center of
any distribution of "galactic" proportions.
These closing velocity-lost masses continue in their x, y
speeds which gives the appearance or net effect of having
the new galaxy spin at uniform rates from its outer most
area to the innermost areas, appropriate to the distance.
Look, let's try this:
Take our favorite rubber sheet pulled tautly level.
Place two or more weighted spheres at each end and upon the
rubber sheet (warped spacetime), and then let them go.
Depending upon the offset (not directly at one another),
their closing paths are somewhat exactly what happens to two
massive black holes when they accelerate to "create" a
galaxy.
THEREFORE:
There isn't any missing dark mass at all in the universe.
And therefore,
There isn't any missing dark energy in the universe as well.
It is all there.
More than enough dirt and radiation to make anybody happy.
The only thing missing is our understanding of what is
actually happening when two dirt clods with the equivalent
of 1011 solar masses zoom towards one another in
the cosmos.
But don't forget, there are still an enormous number of dirt
clods out there that haven't merged to create a visible
light radiating galaxy, and are still just sitting still
slurping up mass into their warped spacetime.
All galaxies appear to need a certain solar mass threshold
in order to redistribute mass. There doesn't appear to be
an ever smaller gradation of galaxies. To pick a value out
of the air for example's sake only, say you need at least
two black holes with 105th or 6th solar masses to
effectuate a visible galaxy distribution. Smaller than
that, something else must happen, other conditions might
interdict the formation of galaxies. Lower closing
velocities? black hole gravitational thresholds aren't
breached? who knows? This is an area for the real
scientists.
Anyhow, Joe's hypothesis is that EVERY galaxy has at its
core not just a black hole but a binary or higher black hole
system. Both of which have distributed much of their mass in
a spiral galaxy formation, all of which rotates evenly for
the most part except perhaps for the innermost which may
still be affected by the resulting binary distribution's
residual core gravitation at least, until some sort of
equilibrium is reached.
And that is why galaxies look like long playing records and
are so "flat".
It is all due to the centrifugal vectors of the closing
distribution.
If ever growing galactic formation occurred from a single
central black hole's gravitation, each galaxy might look
like a small non-directional cluster of stars, which, in
fact, may occur if other black hole masses are drawn into
the preexisting galaxy.
Some visible galaxies look like a struck pinata after being
merged at high closing velocities with other masses.
Gravitational havoc must occur.
Huge clusters no doubt have altered post distribution
formation principals. The assumption there is that they are
just gravitationally closing for reaccretion into a
hypermassive black hole. The Norma cluster comes to mind.
In that case, the clustered galaxies surrounding the monster
black hole may well disappear into the monsters extended
event horizon long before it actually becomes physically
accreted.
Now, a minor addition... well, just read the chapter 8, the
Universe+ chapter and then the
Snot Standard Model.
Now around the edges of a typical galactic distribution is a
resultant somewhat highly gravitational "finger into space"
area that is somewhat additive in that it picks up all the
loose dirt in the area over time, possibly for re-accretion
or maybe for minor star formation and galactic growth.
So we have things like the Sombrero galaxy which shows huge
dirt bands around the periphery. How all the dirt got there
is because the sombrero galaxy like all other galaxies
function as a subsequent post distribution vacuum cleaner.
Say What?
A question has to exist, given all the mass of a galactic
distribution is:
Do galaxies, after formation, begin to reaccret the earlier
forcefully centrifugaled mass?
That is, over time, do the galaxies start to "pull back in"
growing ever smaller in diameter.
M100 verses our own galaxy comes to mind.
Or are the x, y distribution vectors sufficient to stabilize
the galaxy's size as permanent?
Well, just would a shrinking galaxy look like?
Would it start to bulge in the middle and have a dark
particle ring around it?
Would the galaxy in its last reaccretion status look like a
donut with the ever growing black hole in the center?
Would the ever growing event horizon cover the remainder of
the galaxy and cause it to simply look like it was
disappearing?
I suppose it would depend upon the size of the original x, y
distribution values that the original distribution had.
uh... maybe?
hmmm... don't know what subsequently happens... oh well.
Yet another area of observation and study...
As a final aside, substantially unrelated to the above, it
is probably best to just stay on our own little mother ship,
'planet earth' and suffer the slings and arrows of
outrageous occasional solar system spitballs, rather than
venture off into the seas of the apparently infinite cosmos
and fall off the end into the unseen and undetected spheres
of darkness that awaits the hapless voyager.
We are zooming along in our blue spaceship quite nicely,
thank you. Mother earth and mother solar system spaceship
tries to take care of us, but... well that is another
subject...
Our galactic spaceship's own very final fate is already
sealed of course, as our local group of forty-eight galaxies
speed towards a "great attractor", with a guesstimate ETA of
three billion years. Three billion years...
Well, don't unplug the coffee pot just yet.
What? You don't drink coffee? Well then don't let the tea
water cool down yet.
And, by the way... probably a good idea to check up on the
maintenance of our own little blue spaceship's provisions
for our continued viability of the passenger population...
We don't wanna poop out too early...
Think of all the wars and suffering we will miss.
plenty of dark holes to go around for everybody...
just pray...
TOP
TOC
Index