

Honest criticism is hard to take, A large segment of our Jewish Writing website and forum is devoted to critiquing. We have our own way to critique manuscripts, and it may be different from what you expect. This document will therefore clarify some basic issues.
You�ve joined Jewish Writing because you write about Jewish topics. That is commendable. However, can you be sure that you are giving the world your best writing? Where can you turn for help about your writing?
Jewish Writing is prepared to offer you this assistance � and you do need it. Desperately. All writers need it.
We will help you with many other things as well.
There are more reasons to critique as well. We'll read about them soon. However, let's understand the process first. Here's how critiquing works:
Any subscriber to Jewish Writing may submit a document or a manuscript. It should be brief and it should follow our rules.
The other people in the group will review and comment on your precious material over the course of the week.
Yes, very much so. Our fine subscribers are also writers, just like you.
No system is perfect.
Sorry. Can't oblige. We'll have to follow a strict and fair schedule. If this becomes a problem, then we have a solution: Only those who have presented serious and worthwhile critiques will have the right to present a manuscript for others to critique. This will improve the level of critiquing and it will encourage people to critique others. No, we didn't implement that rule yet. However, it might be on the way.
Our Jewish Groups have netiquette requirements. They affect our critiques on Jewish Writing, because we are writing about each other�s works. Therefore, comments should be restricted to the work itself. Ad hominem comments are verboten. Please realize that others have presented their best work.
That doesn't mean that you have the right to be nasty when we don't know about it. Don't flame subscribers off-line, or you will be removed from Jewish Writing.
Furthermore, Jewish Writing is a discussion group. That means that we expect to have a discussion. When you comment off-line, others are deprived of your worthwhile comments. We can�t have much of a discussion that way, can we?
Your critique should have the same Subject: line as the manuscript. It should give us sufficient information and details, so that we know what you are writing about.
Be polite. When it's completed, it would be polite to thank those who submitted critiques - even if you do not agree with everything that was written.
Comment on your critique on-line. We want your feedback.
Don't respond defensively to those who attack your writing. Remain gentle, kind, and constructive - even though you may have been attacked. The person who critiqued you has nothing against you as an individual. His critique was not meant to hurt you.
You bet it will.
Your critiques of others' work will help you note weaknesses or problems in your own writing. If you become sensitive to other's inconsistencies, then you will recognize your own. If you see how others use the best possible terminology, then you will be more sensitive about your own.
Critiquing may indeed be the single most effective and pleasant way to improve your own writing.
But that's not all.
Writers work by themselves - and that work can sometimes be very lonely. Others who enter the room are considered a disturbance or nuisance. Jewish Writing can help you share your feelings and ideas with other people as part of the writing process. It can thereby eliminate this lonesomeness or solitude. Yes, you are a writer, but you are now part of a social group of writers that is working towards a joint cause.
Furthermore, it�s good to know that other writers face the same writer�s block, difficulties with clients, and problems choosing le bon mot. By helping others, you are really helping yourself. You are ultimately becoming a better writer. Your time and effort invested in critiquing is compensated many times over by your increased effectiveness as a writer of Jewish topics.
Critiquing.... sometimes it's welcome it, and sometimes it shows that the reader simply doesn't 'get' the piece. This could be because the writer and the reader are on different wavelengths, or because the writing was not clear, or because of the reader's lack of attentiveness.
Writers can be a little egotistical or subconsciously jealous of writers of a similar genre (Kin'at Sofrim). This results in a lack of proper or objective attentiveness. On the other hand some critiquing is perceptive and helpful.
After reading the suggestions, some of the proposed changes may be very helpful, others may be unnecessary, and still others may prompt you to make alternative changes.
However, any critiquing can be constructive. You, the writer, must decide
as objectively as possible whether the critique is valid and how to gain from it.
particularly from
a relative,
a friend,
an acquaintance,
or a stranger
- Franklin P. Jones
What is critiquing?
Will this critiquing be useful?
What are some other advantages to critiquing on Jewish Writing?
So what's the down side?
Thus, you will receive comments from people with varying qualifications, knowledge, and experience. You will have to sift through their comments and decide what to accept. Our groups discussions will help, but the final decision is up to you.
This can happen on any on-line or personal meeting. That's what group dynamics is all about.
Please don't be personally offended if you are attacked. Relax.
We want to maintain the high level of the discussions. For this reason, Jewish Writing, is moderated strictly. Most off-topic issues are not put through. In most cases, the moderator will not be able to explain why your comment has been rejected, because of the volume of comments that is received.
Some people like this, other people don't.
Some people will appreciate the fact that their email boxes will not be stuffed with irrelevant comments. Others may feel offended, because their own particular gem was not put through.
Wise writers do not see this as a problem. You can learn more from critiquing others and from reading other people�s critiques than by actually writing.
Won't some people want their wonderful magnum opus to be critiqued right away?
What are we expecting you to write in your critique?
How should you act when your own manuscript is being critiqued?
What will you gain from critiquing? Will your writing improve as a result?
One subscriber said it best:
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Are you required to read this article for a course? Do NOT print out the article. It is copyrighted.
Copyright © David Grossman. World rights reserved. This article may not be printed, forwarded, reproduced, or copied in any way or in any medium without written permission from David Grossman.
Keywords: Writing/methods
Your exercise for this article is as follows:
Explain the process of critiquing.
Why and how would somebody benefit by critiquing on Jewish Writing?
/jewishwriting/site/2COWAbout