FAXed to the White House (YOU can too!) Wed March 12, 2003 morning, hand-printed with marker:

Mr. President:

So - You're gonna use our troops as human bait to draw out Saddam's chem + bio weapons, because you don't want to wait for inspectors to uncover them safely. Our troops are completely loyal and of course they would brave unknown dangers for actual DEFENSE, but in this case they might THINK about stuff if they have time-- I guess that's why you don't want to give them any.
YOU are 100's to 1000's of times more dangerous than Saddam or Kim Jong-Il, because you have so many times more WMDs and you're a GOOD man and you think GOD is on your side. That's what SUICIDE BOMBERS think! And the bigger your G-DAMN bombs get, the more it's going to cost the American people to rebuild the Iraqis' industry and transport.
You want to impose YOUR will on the whole world! You bullied your way into office, but you were cunning enough not to claim divine backing then. Do you really think Allah will favor the Overdog now?

-- Janet J-DAM Granofsky

Did you name the MOAB for my MOTHER ?

3-12-03

FAXed to the White House (YOU can too!) Sat March 8, 2003 morning, hand-printed with marker:

You say you KNOW there are WMDs in Iraq and you hint that you know WHERE they are, but you won't tell the Inspectors! or the U.S. Congress. Do you intend to tell our TROOPS where the chemical/ biological agents are before you send them in, or are you still going to keep that info to yourself?
Oh-- you're gonna bomb or missile-strike these sites FIRST, and THEN send the troops in. Isn't blowing up these repositories a lot less accurate + a lot more dangerous that letting Inspectos analyse them first? Bombing could SPREAD nerve gas or biological agents, couldn't it?
Or maybe you're sure that there are such weapons, but you're not sure exactly where. Of course Saddam will USE them if attacked, but our troops might not have their protective equipment handy, and you haven't trained them well enough how to use / it (See CBS 60 Minutes) / don't work right anyway. Or are you gonna take out EVERY warehouse, railcar + truck in Iraq first?
If this were a DEFENSIVE war, would you still think my questions were too nitpicking?
P.S.-- The U.S. Army [[...(later)...]] I'm not telling YOU yet exactly how I know, but I may tell somebody else first.

-- Janet Granofsky

3-8-03

FAXed to the White House (YOU can too!) Thurs March 6, 2003 morning, hand-printed with marker:

Saddam is
already
DAMNED
but JESUS
might not
forgive YOU
if you start
World War III

FAXed to the White House (YOU can too!) Tues Feb 18, 2003 morning, hand-printed with marker:

To U.S. President George W. Bush,
U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney,
U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell:
NO BLOOD
4 jzt another
MILITARY DICTATORSHIP
-especially
YOURS
--Ms. Granofsky, [[my nickname,
(my national* job title)(a sinecure without cure, apparently)]]

2-18-03

A phone message on the Washington Post, Wednesday, September 12, 2001 about 4 PM:

Right now the United States has the sympathy of the whole world, even probably of a lot of the common people all over the world have sympathy for us, and the common people and everybody would help us find the terrorists, but if you bomb a foreign country-- and this is very different from Pearl Harbor, very very different. Pearl Harbor you had the army of a sovereign nation attacking the military of another sovereign nation. This is very different although it is more heinous because they attacked civilians, but if you bomb a foreign country and injure innocents, you will have lost the spiritual battle and you will eventually lose the physical battle-- and by the way most of those Palestinians dancing with joy in the streets-- they are innocents. Jennings said there was evidence that one of the guys was from Saudi Arabia and one of 'em was from Egypt. I mean let's be practical: you can't bomb the Saudis because you don't have ANWR on line yet. And I have 3 bellies by the way. You're right it was an attack against our freedom and our lifestyle, and it was an attack against capitalism, which nobody has seemed to mention yet, and it was an attack against our institutions. BUT hate crimes are an attack on a race, and rape has been said to be an attack on all women on behalf of all men, BUT we don't throw out due process for hate crimes or rape, do we?

If Flight 93 was really headed for the White House or Capitol, its heroic passengers probably saved us all from INSTANT WORLD WAR. Will their sacrifice be in vain?

See also war-relatedProfessor Perlmutter Explains His "Dark Thoughts" and/or
my main Index.

This Comments file originally published by Janet Granofsky as a version of my main Index on October 1, 2001. Due to mistakes it was unpublished Dec.'01 to Jan.'02. This version you are reading was completed on March 17, 2003, which was also notable for other reasons, then corrected on March 29. Also August 6 and 15, 2008 tried to clarify something for Mrs. Lange, the Baltimore County Department of Social Services, the OG girls, etc.; but if you all so uptight about that why don't choo go ax the goddam White House? Mi'swell, I ain't been killed yet.
Š 2003, 2008 Janet Granofsky.