Professor David D. Perlmutter Explains His Dark Thoughts

 
Professor's "Dark Thoughts" article 4/7/02
My email request to Professor 1/19/03
Professor Perlmutter explains himself: email response 1/20/03
Professor and another explain some Arabs' light thoughts 4/18/02

 



Los Angeles Times
April 7, 2002 Sunday Home Edition
Opinion; Part M; Page 3; Editorial Pages Desk
by Professor David D. Perlmutter of Louisana State University

ISRAEL;
Dark Thoughts and Quiet Desperation;
Jews well understand the consequences of passively accepting doom.

When I was in college, an Armenian American acquaintance told me about his grandfather's obsession with the Turkish genocide against his people in the early part of the 20th century. To a comment of "nice weather today," the old man habitually would reply, "What does it matter since our people were slaughtered?"

I wonder if I will be like him 40 years from now. For the first time in my life, I see the shadows of Israel's destruction, if not by Arab armies all at once, then by suicide bombers, one Jewish child and mother at a time. I see an anti-Jewish European press sadistically attacking Israel's defensive measures. I see a clownishly hypocritical United Nations condemning Israel's bulldozing of a building while millions die in the Sudan or Tibet. I see my fellow academics musing and posturing in praise of demons who would cut their throats merely for being non-Muslims.

Small items, too, prick hard. I find myself getting irritated at a Jewish social organization I belong to for raising its dues: Why don't we send all the money to buy Israeli war bonds instead? I am furious when I read that some Jewish media mogul just gave $7 million to the Democratic National Committee. Where is the opposition of our good friends in the Democratic Party to President's Bush's persistent coddling of Yasser Arafat and the House of Saud?

I simmer, too, about how I see Jews fighting consistently for the good of all--from the civil rights movement to the salvation of Bosnian Muslims--but when the hangman comes for us, we find ourselves standing alone.

Mostly, I cannot stand watching the news--with its tired cliches of "cycles" of violence. Today, I see Arafat, sitting in his bunker, talking to "international activists" and proclaiming that the Israelis are just like Nazis. I wonder: Did Adolf Hitler allow his enemies press conferences? I daydream--if only! If in 1948, 1956, 1967 or 1973 Israel had acted just a bit like the Third Reich, then today Israelis would shop, eat pizza, marry and celebrate the holy days unmolested. And of course Jews, not sheiks, would have that Gulf oil. In contrast, if the Arabs had conquered Israel, does anyone think a single Jew would today be alive between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean?

This is what I'm reduced to: thinking like a Nazi when an Arab accuses Jews of acting like Nazis.

 I'm unhappy as well--especially since I teach political communication--at Israel's unsophisticated, unplanned media policy. Since the Lebanon war, the seven squabbling Israeli ministries that claim to control press relations have been notorious for either ignoring or failing to understand the needs of modern journalism. One journalist noted to me: "The Palestinians will go to the news bureaus each day and pitch stories, and go out of their way to help arrange interviews and suggest places to shoot. From the Israeli government, all you get is statements, silence or red tape."

A more ominous reason that the evening news is so laden with images favorable to the Palestinians is that they are chosen and shot by Palestinians. Israeli reporters are banned from working in Palestinian areas; foreign journalists are subtly or violently pressured to either keep out or report with a pro-Palestinian bias. The result is that most television networks and news bureaus use Palestinian stringers for spot news coverage and also for translations. So, Arafat and his allies are allowed to make statements like, "We are the only occupied people in the world" without an accompanying laugh track.

But what to do? I have other dreams as well--apocalyptic ones. I think:

Israel has been building nuclear weapons for 30 years. The Jews understand what passive and powerless acceptance of doom has meant for them in the past, and they have ensured against it. Masada was not an example to follow--it hurt the Romans not a whit, but Sampson in Gaza? With an H-bomb? What would serve the Jew-hating world better in repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a Nuclear Winter. Or invite all those tut-tutting European statesmen and peace activists to join us in the ovens?

For the first time in history, a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away--unlike the Armenians, Tibetans, World War II European Jews or Rwandans--have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?

These are my dark thoughts and quiet desperations. Who will dissolve them? Who will silence the madness? Will I even be allowed to become an old, bitter man? Will any of us have the chance to look back on these days beyond the mushroom clouds of tomorrow?

 


My Email Request to Professor Perlmutter

From:  Janet Granofsky <my imeil asdresd>
Date:  01/19/2003
To:  David D Perlmutter <Prof's imeil asdresd>
cc:  Janet Granofsky <my imeil asdresd>
Subject:  request reproduce "Dark Thoughts.."

Message:
Professor Perlmutter:

I am requesting your permission to reproduce your LA Times article "Israel: Dark Thought and Quiet Desperation" in my Yahoo-Geocities website, with full attribution to yourself, a link to your LSU website, plus comments by myself.

If you do not grant me such permission, I could simply publish a link to http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00544.html, where your article appears without charge to viewers. However I prefer to present your article without leading readers to the ridiculous reactions of those other newsgroup posters. _I_ know you're not really urging Israel to nuke the world! And I can understand your desperation.

Please confirm whether the mail-archive.com link mentioned above presents a complete and accurate quote of your article, OR please send me such a copy.

--Janet Granofsky

 


Response from Professor Perlmutter

From:  "David D Perlmutter" <Prof's imeil asdresd>
To:  <my imeil asdresd>
Subject:  Re: request reproduce "Dark Thoughts.."
Date:  Mon, 20 Jan 2003

Message:
Thanks. I take responsibility for my words, not for the idiots who misinterpreted them, or rather deliberately distorted them for their own purposes. To date I?ve gotten three death threats.

So pardon me if I vent a bit about this. I said clearly that the world was heading toward madness and wondered why no one was trying to stop it. Prophecy is very different than advocacy, yes? The fact is that very soon a whole lot of countries in the Mideast will have nuclear weapons. (Did you know officials in Iran and Syria both said they will use the bomb as soon as they get it).

Also, let's be fair. Hundreds of millions of Christians believe the world will end very soon in an "Armageddon". In fact many look forward to it, write books about it and so on. Will these folks who got mad at me follow up by striding into their local Baptist or Catholic Church and threatening the parishioners with murder for their opinions too?

This piece was written as a "thought" essay expressing my feeling that many people and nations were unfairly attacking Israel for its defensive measures and also holding up the Israelis to standards to which no other military--including America's--are held. I was also pointing out that the stakes are quite high. As several journalists and historians and political scientists have noted Israel has a "Samson" option with its nuclear weapons.

So my point was that we should pay attention to the conflict and try to solve it because for the first time in history "a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away--unlike the Armenians, Tibetans, World War II European Jews or Rwandans--have the power to destroy the world." The context, of course, is that in the previous holocausts the victims were largely abandoned to their fate by an uncaring world. Now the world should know they are at risk as well: with nuclear weapons at play, no war is truly local.

This was a strong statement among many in the piece--but so is reality: Iraq and Iran will also have nukes one day. I think I and most readers understood the difference between a prophecy of dangers (which is what I was expressing) and an advocacy of terrors (which I was not). Indeed, I go on to say in the essay that such an outcome would be "madness" and point out the need to stop it.

I received many supporting emails in response. Others were critical but constructive, but a few were nasty. In those cases, as I said, I think hysteria got in the way of literacy.

The LA Times "owns" the piece but I don?t think they care much if an individual reproduces it for purposes of debate.

DP

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00544.html

 


Professor Perlmutter explains some Arabs' light thoughts about bin Laden's dark thoughts

See article "Why bin Laden's 'confessions' keep flopping"
from the 4/18/02 edition Christian Science Monitor www.csmonitor.com/2002/0418/p11s02-coop.htm
by David D. Perlmutter and Mustafa Saied (President and founder, North American Foundation for Thought and Action)

 


Whose thoughts will Professor Perlmutter explain next?


Janet Granofsky web-published this file on March 16, 2003. Links corrected November 4, 2007.

See also Janet Granofsky's Index,
My Civil Rights Question
My Comments on 9/11, terrorism, war, bush, etc.

 

1