|
HOME
REPORT INDEX
| 4. TARIFF BARRIERS I. Current Situation on General Trade -- II. Analysis and Recommendations on Tariff Barriers I. Current Situation on General Trade Korea
is the 6th most important commercial partner in terms of exports from Chile.
Chilean exports to Korea during 1999 totaled US$ 684 million, with a high
concentration of mining products (roughly 80%) and forestry products (16%).[1]
The rest of the products, among which included fishery, agriculture, and fruit,
accounted for only 4.5% of the total. With
respect to the average tariff rate applied to each other, Korea paid in April
2000 an average tariff for exports to Chile of 8.9% (9.0% was the highest),
while Chile paid an average tariff rate of 3.6%.[2]
This seems to be in contraposition to the current situation, where Chile is more
open to trade than Korea. However, it is because Korea has no middle range
tariff rates. There are only two kinds of tariff rates in Korea, one being
extremely low—or even zero—for raw materials, and the other being extremely
high, so high that, depending on the degree of added value, in many cases they
are too cost-prohibitive to be imported. Thus,
basically, an FTA with substantial reduction in tariffs for these goods will be
beneficial for Chilean industries.
The relative size of the Korean and Chilean markets makes the prospect much
brighter. Korean total imports during 1999 were US$ 113.95 billion, which is
almost 10 times the size of Chilean exports. In addition to this positive
factor, exports from Chile to Korea grew between 1991 and 1999 at 12.7%, while
global exports grew at 7.3%.[3]
This is evidence of the attractiveness of the Korean market for Chilean
exporters. In
order to analyze the current situation of the trade between Chile and Korea more
in detail, TABLE
1 provides a comparison between the global exports from Chile and the
exports from Chile to Korea. Also in this table, the tariffs applied to products
exported from Chile to Korea are shown. From
TABLE
1, it is clear to see the potential benefit for Chile. Nineteen out of the
30 top products exported globally have imposed on them a duty higher than or
equal to 10% (14 out of the 19), or are forbidden from trade (5 out of the 19).
The only two products not included in these 19 are “coniferous wood shaped and
doors and their frames and thresholds” and “non-coniferous wood in chips and
particles,” with 8% and 2% tariffs respectively and no participation in the
exports to Korea.[4] Based
on this analysis, it can be concluded that the most important products that
could potentially benefit from agreed tariff reductions or from permissions to
import are:
These
21 products that account for 22.6% of global Chilean exports represent only 1.3%
of export to Korea. This is clearly the most relevant fact that reflects the
importance of negotiating an FTA with Korea and guiding the negotiations around
these products. The reason is
again the tariff system applied by the Korean government that increases tariffs
according to the value added to the product (low or zero tariffs for raw
materials and higher for highly processed items). Korea uses “adjustment
tariffs,” i.e., raises its tariffs up to higher rates, to protect domestic
producers. In 2000, Korea renewed for another year adjustment tariffs on 27 of
the 30 items on which tariff adjustments were used in 1999, but reduced the
tariff rates for 20 of these items. Among the 27 remaining items, 14 are
seafood, six are agricultural, and four are textiles. In 1997, Korea agreed, as
a condition of its IMF stabilization package, to reduce the number of products
subject to tariff adjustments.[5] The
escalated tariff system’s results can be seen in the TABLE
2, where the low share of total exports of the agricultural, fishery, and
industrial sectors to Korea is vividly observed. Concerning
the import from Korea to Chile, the most
important products are transportation vehicles (22.6%), laundry machines (7.1%),
and polyethylene (3.3%).[6]
The rest of the products include electronic products (refrigerators,
televisions, and microwave ovens), cargo vehicles, tires, among others. A
summary of these products can be seen in TABLE 3. An
FTA may increase exports of these goods
from Korea to Chile, which is a challenge for the domestic industry. At present,
it is possible to see signals of the concern in domestic industry. In fact,
Chile has decided to look into allegations that Korean refrigerators and washing
machines are being dumped.[7] [1] ProChile, Report of The Chilean government Agency on bilateral trade between Chile and Korea, March 2000. [2] "Tratado de Libre Comercio Chile y Corea", El Mercurio, July 11, 2000. [3] Minister of Economy of Chile, Foreign Trade Department, Barriers to Trade, 2000. [4] Whether the reason for no export with relatively lower tariff is due to the existence of non-tariff barriers should be analyzed further but is excluded from this analysis, since it is not the main concern of the report. [5]
US Trade Representative, National
Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers (Korea),
2000. [6]
ProChile, Report
of The Chilean government Agency on bilateral trade between Chile and Korea,
March 2000. [7] “Chile Alega Dumping de Heladeras Coreanas”, “La Tercera”, October 20, 2000. |
|
For problems or questions regarding the content of this web-page or any other
issue, you can contact
any member of the Global Team. |