(A4e1a) international terrorist organizations

The number of international terrorist organizations appears to be growing. Those which promote and commit the killing of pre-born children have caused the most destruction. Now those of us who survived the womb are increasingly being targeted. The links take you to information about some of the international terrorist organizations. ******* As of this date, 06-05-19, this folder contains 2 items. ******* item 1 THE LOOMING THREAT OF ISLAM ******* item 2 CLASH OF WHAT'S? ********************************************************************************************************* ******* item 1 THE LOOMING THREAT OF ISLAM ******* From: D. Pipes via Robert Jason [email protected] ******* Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 ******* Dear Friends: While we are commendably pre-occupied with the secular-left-liberal assault against the God-ordained institution of Marriage, let us not forget the looming threat of Islam to our Judeo-Christian civilization. ******* Here is a recent reminder, provided by the renowned authority on Islam, Daniel Pipes. ******* <><> ******* Denying Terrorism, by Daniel Pipes, New York Sun, February 8, 2005, http://www.danielpipes.org/article/2396, http://www.nysun.com/article/8881 ******* Anyone following the investigation into the mid-January slaughter of the Armanious family (husband, wife, two young daughters), Copts living in Jersey City, N.J., knows who the presumptive suspects are: Islamists furious at a Christian Egyptian immigrant who dares engage in Internet polemics against Islam and who attempts to convert Muslims to Christianity. ******* The authorities, however, have blinded themselves to the extensive circumstantial evidence, insisting that "no facts at this point" substantiate a religious motive for the murders. ******* Somehow, the prosecutor missed that all four members of this quiet family were savagely executed in the ritualistic Islamist way (multiple knife attacks and near-beheading); that Jersey City has a record of Islamist activism and jihadi violence, and that an Islamist Web site, carried multiple threats against Hossam Armanious with postings such as: "We are going to track you down like a chicken and kill you." ******* Law enforcement seems more concerned to avoid an anti-Muslim backlash than to find the culprits. ******* This attitude of denial fits an all-too-common pattern. I previously documented a reluctance in nearby New York City to see as terrorism the 1994 Brooklyn Bridge ("road rage" was the FBI's preferred description) and the 1997 Empire State Building shootings ("many, many enemies in his mind," said Rudolph Giuliani). And the July 2002 LAX murders were initially dismissed as "a work dispute" and the October 2002 rampage of the Beltway snipers went unexplained, leaving the press to ascribe it to such factors as a "stormy [family] relationship." ******* These instances are part of a yet-larger pattern. ******* * The 1990 murder of Rabbi Meir Kahane by the Islamist El Sayyid Nosair was initially ascribed by the police to "a prescription drug for or consistent with depression." ******* * The 1999 crash of EgyptAir 990, killing 217 - by a co-pilot not supposed to be near the aircraft's controls at that time who repeated 11 times "I rely on God" as he wrenched the plane down - went unexplained by the National Transportation Safety Board. ******* * The 2002 purposeful crash of a small plane into a Tampa high-rise by bin Laden-sympathizer Charles Bishara Bishop went unexplained; the family chimed in by blaming the acne drug Accutane. ******* * The 2003 murder and near-decapitation in Houston of an Israeli by a former Saudi friend who had newly become an Islamist found the police unable to discern "any evidence" that the crime had anything to do with religion. ******** Nor is this a problem unique to American authorities. ******** * The 1993 attack on foreign guests dining at the Semiramis Hotel in Cairo, killing five, accompanied by the Islamist cry "Allahu Akbar," inspired the Egyptian government to dismiss the killer as insane. ******* * The 2000 attack on a bus of visibly Jewish schoolchildren near Paris by a hammer-wielding North African yelling "You're not in Tel-Aviv!" prompted police to describe the assault as the result of a traffic incident. ******* * The 2003 fire that gutted the Merkaz HaTorah Jewish secondary school in a Paris suburb, requiring 100 firefighters to douse the flames, was described by the French minister of the interior as being merely of "criminal origin." ******* * The 2004 murder of a Hasidic Jew with no criminal record as he walked an Antwerp street near a predominantly Muslim area left the Belgian authorities stumped: "There are no signs that racism was involved." ******* I have cited 13 cases here and provide information on further incidents on my weblog. Why this repeated unease acknowledging Islamist terrorism by the authorities, why the shameful denial? ******* And for that matter, why a similar unwillingness to face facts about right-wing extremists, as in the 2002 murder by a cursing skinhead of a Hasidic Jew outside a kosher pizzeria in Toronto, which the police did not find to rate as a hate crime? Because terrorism has much greater implications than prescription drugs going awry, road rage, lunatics acting berserk, or freak industrial accidents. Those can be shrugged off. Islamist terrorism, in contrast, requires an analysis of jihadi motives and a focus on Muslims, steps highly unwelcome to authorities. ******* And so, police, prosecutors, and politicians shy away from stark realities in favor of soothing and inaccurate bromides. This ostrich-like behavior carries heavy costs; those who refuse to recognize the enemy cannot defeat him. To pretend terrorism is not occurring nearly guarantees that it will recur. ******* To comment on this article, please go to http://www.danielpipes.org/article/2396#comment ******* To see the Daniel Pipes archive, go to http://www.DanielPipes.org ******* To subscribe to or unsubscribe from this list, go to http://www.DanielPipes.org/subscribe.php ******* (Daniel Pipes sends out a mailing of his writings 2-3 times a week.) ******* Sign up for related (but non-duplicating) e-mail services: ******* Middle East Forum (media alerts, event reports, MEQ articles): http://www.meforum.org/subscribe.php ******* Campus Watch (research, news items, press releases): http://www.campus-watch.org/subscribe.php ******* You may freely forward this information, but on condition that you send the text as an integral whole along with complete information about its author, date, and source. ******************************************************************************** ******* item 2 CLASH OF WHAT'S? (By DAVID WARREN) ******* From: Robert A. Jason ******* Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 ******* Sometimes I am brought up short by the clarity and courage with which someone else -- with more to lose than I have -- states a truth. I am a Catholic Christian, who often dismisses “secular humanists�?. But I’m in awe of people like Canada’s Irshad Manji, the “Muslim refusenik�?, who had the courage in her book The Trouble with Islam to directly confront the horrors done in Allah’s name -- in, as she put it, “Pick a country, any Muslim country.�? ******* Another is Wafa Sultan, an Arab woman practising psychology, now living in the States. A self-professed “disbeliever in the supernatural�?, she has posted essays on the Internet in Arabic, including research into the fate of women under various Islamic regimes. She has willingly and ably confronted Muslim fanatics on Arab TV, most recently on Feb. 21st, when she debated Dr Ibrahim Al-Khouli on Al-Jazeera. A transcript and video clips with English subtitles were made available this week by the Middle East Media Research Institute (“Memri�?) -- an indispensable institution, based in Israel, that distributes hard information and accurate translations of documents from the Arab world. (It is useless to condemn it as “Zionist�? -- everything Memri publishes is sourced and checkable.) ******* With great bravery, Dr Sultan confronts the “tu quoque�? (“you too�?) arguments of the apologists for Islamic terror -- refusing to let them change the subject from what they have done, said, and approved, to misty rhetoric against Zionists, Yankees, Imperialists, Crusaders. Boldly on Al-Jazeera, last week, she said what our Western politicians, media flaks, and academic celebrities won’t say, from cowardice in its many forms. Excerpt: ******* “The clash we are witnessing around the world is not a clash of religions, or a clash of civilizations. ... It is a clash between civilization and backwardness, between the civilized and the primitive, between barbarity and rationality. It is a clash between freedom and oppression, between democracy and dictatorship. It is a clash between human rights, on the one hand, and the violation of these rights, on the other. It is a clash between those who treat women like beasts, and those who treat them like human beings. What we see today is not a clash of civilizations. Civilizations do not clash, but compete.�? ******* The sparkling TV host interrupts to ask if Dr Sultan insinuates the clash is, “between the culture of the West, and the backwardness and ignorance of the Muslims�?. Dr Sultan replies, “Yes, that is what I mean.�? ******* The host reminds her that this phrase, “clash of civilizations�?, came from Samuel Huntington, not Osama bin Laden. Dr Sultan reminds him that Islamic books and curricula, going back to the Koran, are full of calls for “fighting the infidels�?. ******* When her opponent, Dr Khouli, claims he never offends people, Dr Sultan reminds that among other things he calls Westerners “al-Dhimma�? (i.e. the Muslims’ natural slaves), that he routinely compares them to apes and pigs, that he calls Christians “those who incur Allah's wrath�?, and so forth. ******* He asks if she is a heretic. Dr Sultan says, he can call her what he likes. He continues, “If you are a heretic, there is no point in rebuking you, since you have blasphemed against Islam, the Prophet, and the Koran!�? She replies, “These are personal matters that do not concern you. ... Brother, you can believe in stones, as long as you don't throw them at me.�? ******* And after the usual banter about Zionism, she notes that since the Holocaust, the Jews have made the world respect them by their work and knowledge, not their crying and yelling. “We have not seen a single Jew blow himself up in a German restaurant. We have not seen a single Jew destroy a church.�? Likewise, though professing Muslims turned ancient Buddha statues into rubble, “We have not seen a single Buddhist burn down a mosque, kill a Muslim, or torch an embassy.�? ******* Since the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington, many thousand other barbaric acts have been reported, around the world, each one performed explicitly in the name of Allah. This is fact, not prejudice, and our refusal to make Islam an issue plays directly into the fanatics’ hands. ******* It is not our business to “define Islam�?, as so many Muslims aver. It is the Muslims’ duty to define it, in such a way that we will not mistake it for a sword held to our own throats. For when it is presented as a sword, it becomes our business. ******* David Warren, © Ottawa Citizen, www.davidwarrenonline.com ********************************************************************************

Links to other sites on the Web

(A4e1a1) Al-Qaeda
(A4e1a2) Center for Reproductive Rights
(A4e1a3) International Plannned Parenthood Federation
(A4e1a4) European Union
(A4e1a5) United Nations
(A4e1a6) (A) home page

The following warning is a prophetic message given to me, Frank Wagner, in November of 1974. ******* LISTEN TO THE CRY OF THE ABORTED CHILDREN. THEIR CRY IS NO. THEIR CRY IS A CRY OF TERROR. HEED THEIR CRY. ******* This prophecy is now being fulfilled. ******* For details about the source, meaning and fulfillment of this prophetic message go to ******* http://ca.geocities.com/fwagner4/index.html ******* email me at *** [email protected] ***