P. 3 of 18
[page 3] criminal complaint was defective!... And if I recall correctly he told the court that day, "Something is wrong! about this complaint; if something is not wrong with this complaint I'll eat my hat on Wisconsin Avenue!" But Eisenberg did not say what that something was?...
Which I found out later what he was talking about once I learned how to read; and I will speak on, when I get to the issue of the complaint itself.
Mr Eisenberg made no! motion to have the complaint dismissed which is what a competent attorney would have done to preserve his client rights. No, instead Mr Eisenberg asked the court for a 30 day competency examination for me! To see if I was competent to stand trial. But I later found out, what he did was give my family 30 days to come up with his attorney fees! And at the same time give the police 30 days to try and come up with some kind of evidence against me.
And Mr Eisenberg also on this date, allowed the police to draw blood from me and convey it to the State regional crime laboratory; only!! if a Robert Penny, private investigator of Eisenberg was present when the blood was drawn and allegedly accompany it to the crime labs. And all of this was to have taken place this same day once I was returned to the county jail... the blood was taken from me on that day! And as far as the rest of the rest of the court stipulation I do not know because I was no there to see them carry it out, but I do not believe that they turned over all the blood that was taken from me on that day, because this arraiignment hearing took place some time in February 1982!
And we know from the record that Eisenberg withdrew from the case in March of 1982. But I have two documents: a letter from the chief of police Harold A. Breier, dated May 20, 1982; and a crime lab (DJ-LE-102A Form) dated May 20, 1982. And these two documents clearly show the Milwaukee Police Department sending ïtem CK"one glass test tube containing my blood! Read further..