| WHICH ONE IS MORE SCIENTIFIC, CREATION OR EVOLUTION THEORY? |
| One day I thought God might not allow us to prove His Existance because it's against His absolute Sovereinity. But It might be allowed for us to think about which way of thinking is more scientific, creation or evolution. 1> We are accustomed to think evolution theory is more scientific than creation. That's just because the evolution theory is an opinion of a scientist called Darwin while the creation theory is what the Bible is talking about. 2> And also it's because evolution theory is relatively newer than that of creation. 3> Are these two points could be a logical support for evolution theory? Is there any other reasonable or logical proof that evolution theory is more scientific? The answer is 'no'. 4> Then we seriously need to think about this matter. 1> Dr. Porsche designed the dream machine. Everybody wants to have one or even wants to sit in the car. 2> Last January the dream machine was evolved from air-cooling engine to water cooling system. We may call this an evolution because it's such a well-designed driving machine though it is much less than human body & mentality. 3> Is this kind of evolution exactly the same with that of Darwin's evolution? The answer is 'no'. 4> Did Dr. Porsche's driving machine happened to become water-cooling engine by chance, as Darwin's evolution talks about? The answer is 'no' again. The designer of the car designed anew. Yes, those two older and newer models of the car look similar and structurally similar. Yes, those two models are all rear-engine sports cars. However, no one on earth who is not insaine would say that it was evolved by chance as Darwin says. 5> Yes, monkeys and we, humans, are similar in appearance and even in structure. Can this be a proof that we are evolved from those poor animals? On contrary, this similarity is strong evidence that there is only One Designer. As the Porsche's water-cooling engine was not evolved from the previous model's air-cooling engine by chance, the lungs were not evolved from the gills by chance. 1> Probability is an unseparable part of Darwin's evolution theory. 2> It says there were enormously various kinds of organic compounds multimillion years ago, and one out of that huge number of probability had a life by chance. 3> That primitive life form adapted the environment and the most compatible life forms survived and breeded. 4> So, Darwin's evolution theory is a theory of probability. 1> The equation posted on the right side of this column means '1/2 > 1/3 > 1/4 > 1/5 > ������ > 1/1000 > 1/10000 > 1/100000 > ����. > 0.00000001 > 0.000000001 ����.. it gets close to 'zero''. And also this equation is used in every scientific calculations including building bridges, and sending space crafts to Mars. This implies that the chance of taking one red ball out of infinitely many white balls is zero or must be considered zero to be scientific. It also means that it is more scientific to consider it equal to zero. But only in evolution theory it is not considered zero. This is why I think creation is more scientific than evolution theory. 2> Darwin said one organic compound out of infinitely large number could have life, and then, again, out of huge probability, one life form survived to evolve to becom human. 3> The fundamental of science, which is mathematics, says it approaches 'zero', while Darwin argues it approaches human from infinately large number of organic compounds via one single lifeless organic compound which could obtain something called life by chance. 4> Did Darwin think scientifically? WHICH ONE IS MORE SCIENTIFIC, CREATION OR EVOLUTION? The Designer didn't prove Himself to exist or didn't allow us to do. Did He have to prove it? Did Dr. Porsche have to prove his existence to the sports cars he designed? Anything non-scientific must be deleted from all the science textbooks on earth. And Something scientific must be taught in all the science classes on earth. And we must distinguish 'evolution on purpose' from 'evolution by chance' so that we can correct a major misunderstanding of life-forms in biology. |
| Y.S. Lee M.D. |
| Name: |
| Email: |
| since Sept. 2000 |
| "Bring me a worm that can comprehend a man, and then I will show you a man that can comprehend the triune God!" --- John Wesley |
 |
   |
| Please, Leave your comments on my GUEST BOOK |
| OTHER THOUGHTS OF Dr.LEE PostNuclear War Church Bell |
