It is the common aspiration of all the dyers to
achieve an uniform dyeing. Unfortunately, no matter how well a given
formula reacts in the laboratory dyeing equipment, But in the actual
production environment, the scenario might alter. The formula may fail
to click after all. Often the reason cited for such a failure is
attributed to irregular dyebath flows. Therefore there is prime
importance of maintaining uniformity in dye bath flow in a production
equipment. If this is not followed in letter and spirit, there is every
chance of an inconsistency in dyed material. It is imperative for any
modern dye house to have sound dye bath controlling technology.
A dye bath control mechanism can be broadly divided
into two steps.
Measurement-
In this step, first a sample from a dye bath is taken. After that,
the theoretical recipe is either fed into the computer, or is procured
from the database. An optimal dilution required for the transmission
analysis is worked out automatically. It is then carried out by the
control mechanism. This is then followed by taking the measurement. This
generally happens at a spectrum of 200-850 nm at 2 nm pitch. As soon as
the measurement is over, the system automatically cleans itself. Finally
the measurement results are checked for evaluation in a computer.
Evaluation
and correction- In the second step after measurement, the control
mechanism indicates whether the dye bath is rejected or accepted. In
addition, the control mechanism also gives a detailed information
regarding the mistakes. Total error, concentration error, shade error
etc. are effectively pointed out. Tolerances may be adjusted based on
the specific requirements. A multi component analysis is put to use for
analyzing an error.
If the dye bath is rejected for any reason, there exists a possibility
to put a proposal in place for rectification. This is calculated taking
into consideration the volume of the dye bath.
There are various causes for a defective Dye Bath
some of the important ones are given here under:
Delivery-
It may happen, that there are fluctuations in the dyestuff lots as
delivered by the supplier. Usually a tolerance of (+/-) 3-5% is quite
acceptable.
Humidity/
Storage- This is one of the biggest and most basic problem.
Depending on the condition inside the storehouse, there is likely
increase or decrease in moisture content of the dyestuffs. It has been
found that these errors are invariably the biggest sources for a
defective dye bath. It has been seen that fluctuations can go up to 30%
or more. The table below shows the effect of the humidity on dyestuff.
| Dyestuff |
Adaptation Time |
Change in
dyestuff |
Color
difference de |
|
Condition
20/40 |
Condition
20/80 |
Humidity in % |
Wool |
PA |
| B-Blue |
72h |
|
-4.0 |
3.74 |
1.43 |
|
|
72h |
12.5 |
3.28 |
5.83 |
| B-yellow |
72h |
|
-4.3 |
1.51 |
1.56 |
|
|
120h |
27.5 |
8.06 |
4.12 |
| B-Red |
72h |
|
-2.3 |
1.65 |
1.78 |
|
|
72h |
7.5 |
1.21 |
1.90 |
| C-Blue |
72h |
|
-2.8 |
1.79 |
0.76 |
|
|
48h |
7.5 |
1.55 |
1.45 |
| C-Yellow |
96h |
|
-2.7 |
2.53 |
2.97 |
|
|
48h |
7.5 |
1.84 |
1.85 |
| C-Red |
96h |
|
-1.8 |
1.93 |
1.56 |
|
|
48h |
10.0 |
3.06 |
2.54 |
Preparation
Errors- There can be preparation errors. This can happen with
incorrect exchange of one dyestuff with the other. Weighing error (as in
manual preparation) is also seen. Error of Dosing in automated color
kitchens (like defective valves or agitators) is also seen. It has been
seen that even for a system with full automation, chances of errors lie
typically in the range of 2-3%.
Miscellaneous
Errors- Other types of errors include contamination, dilution
(preparation volume) or errors in the form of calculation.
It has been found in conventional dyeing that after
dyeing, only the dye and a few of the speciality chemicals gets fully
consumed during the operation. While most of the chemicals remaining in
the dye bath are rejected. Increasingly due to tough environmental
guidelines, the dye houses have been forced to study the feasibility of
dye bath re-use. The dye bath reuse depends on a number of factors like
dye, shade, colour, and if dyeing is carried out in a continuous or
batch process. It has been found that in some cases, with a plan in
place dye baths can be successfully re-used at least between 5 - 25
times.
Some of the processes where dye bath re-use has been very successfully
implemented are shown in the following table.
| Product |
fiber |
Dye |
Machine |
| Knit Fabric |
Polyester |
Disperse |
Jet |
|
Cotton |
Reactive/Direct |
Beck |
|
Poly/cotton |
Disperse/Reactive/Direct |
Beck |
| Yarn Package |
Polyester |
Disperse |
Package |
|
Poly/cotton |
Disperse/Reactive/Direct |
Package |
| Hosiery |
Nylon |
Acid |
Paddle |
| Hosiery |
Nylon |
Disperse/Acid |
Rotary drum |
| Carpet |
Nylon |
Disperse/Acid |
Beck |
|
Polyester |
Disperse |
Beck |
Design of Dye Bath Reuse System
There are many alternative ways to design a system for Dye Bath reuse.
Though limitations like the physical and production limitations of the
dyeing process also affects the design for Dye bath re use. Two methods
of Dye bath re use are discussed here.
Holding
tank-pump system (dyebath transfer)- In this system, one pump and a
tank are enough for two dye machines.
Additionally for three to four dye machines, there is a need for two
storage tanks. As pumpings are generally accomplished within a time span
of approximately five minutes, a single pump with properly operated
valves is sufficient for dyebath transfer. In both the cases a proper
production schedule is a must.
Material
Transfer Methods- The Material transfer method for dye bath re use
can take the form of two possibilities. First, where the the dyed
material is moved to another dye machine for conventional rinsing.
Second, where the the dyed material is moved to another location for
nonconventional rinsing. If this method is implemented, provided it is
physically and technically tenable to the production process. The
material transfer method results in savings from the cost of design and
installation of a pumping system.