by Nathan Coppedge page
Part I. Effective-Meaning: Objective-Time
�1.a Notes on the Third Iteration page 2
Because Death-Immortality is ultimately an either-or proposition,� we can state that there are two possibilities for the Soul�s relation to God in the form of Judgment:
1. Soul : God :: Death : Life-Change
2. Soul : God :: Immortality : Life-Change.
Since the state of Death or Immortality represents the Death-Immortality axis, we can say that as soon as we choose one, we must choose a relationship with the opposite end of the axis in order for the Judgment union to balance.
So there are two options:
Soul : God :: Immortality : Change
Soul : God :: Death : Life
Now it becomes important how we define Soul and God. We have defined them respectively as Subjective and Objective perception. Remember that (so far) we are looking for the Effective-Meaning of Subjective-Perception. So we can derive the following:
Insofar as Subjective-Perception is Immortal, Objective-Perception Changes.
Insofar as Subjective-Perception Changes, Objective-Perception is Immortal.
Insofar as Subjective-Perception entails Death, Objective-Perception entails Life.
Insofar as Subjective-Perception entails Life, Objective-Perception entails Death.
Now we can move onto the second part of this particular analogy.
NEXT
� And since we are considering death to be the death of meaning, and hence meaningless apart from its relation to life� (we can say that the more a soul is part of the world, the more potential it has to become God.)
Preface
Chart
Summary
Part 1a.
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Iteration 4
Part 1b.
Iteration 5
Iteration 6
PART II.
(incomplete)
PART III.
(outline)
PART IV.
(outline)
NOTES
Philosophy and Writing Main Menu