Mission Statement
The People Behind TAPATT
Feedback
Reference Material
2005: A Year of Maoist Resurgence
by Gary Leupp
www.dissidentvoice.org
January 24, 2006

The year 2005 was a good one for the Maoist movement, the most
vigorous trend within what remains of the communist movement that
transformed the globe in the twentieth century. Four episodes in the
four countries most affected by Maoist organizations should suffice to
establish that Marxism-Leninism, its Maoist form, not only remains a
factor in global affairs, but also is rapidly gaining in strength and
significance.

(1) In Nepal, in a single 11-hour battle on August 7 against the Royal
Nepali Army (RNA), guerrillas of the People's Liberation Army, the
military wing of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), killed 159
soldiers at a road construction site at Kalikot, capturing about 50
prisoners. This stunning feat followed battles with security forces
resulting in 12 security forces killed on Jan. 1, 23 on Jan. 19, 14 on
June 7, and 19 on June 25. Increasingly the PLA deploys hundreds of
troops in confronting the police or even the RNA. Attacks on police
stations, often the only bastions of state authority in the criminally
neglected countryside, on banks and land offices, produce a power
vacuum readily filled by the Maoists and newly recruited local cadre
attracted to the party's concrete measures to end arranged marriages,
wife-beating, class and gender inequities in education, debt slavery
and other "feudal" practices, caste discrimination and unchecked
crime.

The CPM (Maoist) controls about 80% of the country, and makes inroads
into the Katmandu Valley where one-tenth of the Nepali population
lives. The Feb. 1 assumption of absolute power by the unpopular king
alienated the residents of the capital, who have relentlessly defied
the law to demonstrate support for democracy and, increasingly, for
the republic long demanded by the Maoists. Soon after their Kalikot
triumph, the Maoists announced a unilateral cease-fire, which the
regime did not match and indeed dismissed as a ploy. But it was
popular with the mainstream opposition, and in November the "seven
agitating parties" (the legal, parliamentary parties represented in
the last legislature) signed a pact with the Maoists to coordinate
actions against the absolutist monarchy.

CPN (Maoist) leader Prachanda declared over a year ago that the
People's War in Nepal had reached the stage of "strategic offensive"
and implied that from now on, the guerrilla struggle surrounding the
cities will work in tandem with an urban insurrection to bring about
first a "new democracy" and later a socialist state. This is not at
all a fanciful scenario, however horrifying it may seem to the rulers
of India, facing their own Naxalite challenge; the rulers of China,
facing social turmoil and uncomfortable with the revolutionary
egalitarian legacy of the Mao they have long since repudiated; and to
the rulers of the U.S. who fervently wish to believe that "communism
is dead."

(2) It was a good year for the Maoists of India too. Their most
sensational achievement of 2005 was the attack by the Communist Party
of India (Maoist) on the prison in Jehanabad in Bihar, 50 kilometers
from the state capital of Patna, on the evening of November 12. Biking
around the town around 8:30, the Maoists announced "a militant action
of revolutionary character" and warned people to remain indoors.
Immediately cutting power lines, they continued to make announcements
through a public address system for the next two and a half hours, as
they attacked police lines, the offices of the district
administration, and the jail simultaneously. Using conventional rather
than guerrilla military tactics, they overwhelmed the police, who
simply surrendered. While freeing 341 inmates from the prison,
including senior local Maoist leader Ajay Kanu, they took the
opportunity to assassinate at least two leaders of an upper-caste
militia. The CPI (Maoist) lost only two fighters. "It was perhaps the
most audacious operation ever launched by Maoists in India," observed
one horrified journalist.

In September 2004, two large Maoist parties merged to form the CPI
(Maoist) and to coordinate actions throughout West Bengal, Bihar,
Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and
Maharashtra states. Meanwhile, as a member of the Revolutionary
Internationalist Movement (RIM) and the Coordinating Committee of
Maoist Parties and Organizations of South Asia (CCMPOSA) the CPI
(Maoist) has developed ties with other like-minded parties, including
the CPN (Maoist). On September 2, the Nepali party chairman,
Prachanda, and the General Secretary of the Indian party, Ganapathy,
issued a joint statement confirming the long Red Corridor of armed
struggle stretching from the Base Areas in Nepal up to the guerrilla
zones of Andhra Pradesh. This is sometimes called the "Compact
Revolutionary Zone" and its establishment terrifies the Indian status
quo.

As of October 2005, the Indian Home Ministry estimated that the
Maoists had "9,300 hardcore underground cadre and they hold around
6,500 regular weapons besides a large number of unlicensed
country-made arms." It declared that the sphere of influence of the
"Naxalites" (Maoists) had rapidly spread during the previous 18 months
from 76 districts across nine states to 118 districts in 12 states.
"[T]he battle between naxalites and the state apparatus," predicted a
Frontline journalist, "will acquire more intense proportions in the
days to come."

(3) Meanwhile in the Philippines, a Maoist insurgency dating back to
1969 has revived significantly in recent years. On November 20, the
New People's Army, the armed wing of the Communist Party of the
Philippines, killed at least nine soldiers and wounded 20 in an ambush
near Canilog town on Mindoro island. In a separate attack several
hours later, one policeman was killed and three wounded in Quezon
province. This was the heaviest daily battle toll since June 26, 2003,
when the NPA killed 16 soldiers. But between March 27 and May 15, the
NPA responded to an Armed Forces of the Philippines offensive in
Surigao Del Sur, designed to clear the way for logging and mining, by
killing over 60 AFP troops. In 116 tactical offensives from Sept. 13
to Nov. 23, including ambushes, raids, "sparrow operations" (quick
attacks in population centers), and sniping incidents, the NPA killed
128 government troops and acquired 54 high-powered firearms.

According to Pacific Strategies and Assessments, a security
consultancy, NPA attacks averaged fewer than 30 per month through
June, but the figure rose from July, reaching 50 or more in November
and December. The Manila government acknowledged 458 soldiers killed
in clashes with Maoists in 2005. The Maoist guerrillas number around
10,000 at this point, and are active throughout the archipelago. On
March 29 (the NPA's 36th anniversary), the organization reported, "The
NPA has significantly increased the number of its full-time Red
fighters and its automatic rifles and other high-powered weapons. It
has organized and trained the people's militia for police work or
internal security in the localities and the self-defense in the mass
organizations. It is now operating in more than 130 guerrilla fronts
covering significant portions of nearly 70 provinces, in around 800
municipalities and more than 9,000 barrios." With an array of legal
aligned organizations, and even supporters in the Congress, the
Filipino Maoists are well-positioned to take advantage of the
political crisis enveloping the Macapagal-Arroyo administration and
the nationalist backlash occasioned by the deployment of U.S. troops
in the country after 9-11.

(4) Finally, the Maoists of Peru. It was really the Communist Party of
Peru (popularly known as Sendero Luminoso or the Shining Path) led by
Dr. Abimael Guzman (President Gonzalo) that insisted, from the 1970s,
the "Mao Zedong Thought" inspiring many communists and leftwing
radicals throughout the world was not merely a body of ideas
applicable to the Chinese experience but a third stage of Marxist
thought (after Leninism) of universal relevance. They took the term
"Maoism" -- hitherto largely a derogative _expression used by Soviet
critics of China -- and used it to connote the Marxism appropriate to
the era of capitalist restoration. Mao had emphasized that even under
socialism, class struggle continues and can result in great leaps
backwards as well as forwards. With this point in mind, some pro-China
Marxists were able to assess and reject the restoration of capitalism
in China under Deng Xiaoping, face the reality of a new period without
any socialist country to serve as revolutionary headquarters, and
struggle to re-establish socialism based on accumulated positive and
negative historical experience. The Revolutionary Communist Party
(USA) played an important role in upholding Mao's legacy, although it
lagged behind the Peruvian party in concluding that Maoism represents
a third stage in the history of Marxism.

As communism was in most quarters pronounced dead, the Maoist movement
in Peru spread like a prairie fire, acquiring control over maybe
one-third of the country when Guzman and other members of the Central
Committee were captured in September 1992. This event, despite
Guzman's heroic "speech from the cage" when presented to the press
under the most humiliating circumstances, was an enormous setback to
the Peruvian movement. When it was reported that Guzman had agreed to
call for an end to the armed struggle (a claim that still cannot be
verified since Guzman has been unable to talk to the press) a two-line
struggle erupted within the party. Many, demoralized and
disillusioned, renounced the People's war. But a small component,
numbering, according to the mainstream press, in the hundreds,
persisted in the armed struggle and has occasionally shocked the
Peruvian state with its audacity. In February 2001, the Maoists shot
down a military helicopter in the Viscat�n area, Huanta province,
Ayacucho, killing a sergeant and wounding a lieutenant. Since 2002,
occasional attacks on military outposts, ambushes of soldiers,
temporary seizure of villages whose residents are assembled to hear
political speeches, and bomb attacks on government offices have
produced much talk of a "Sendero revival."

In March 2002, Newsweek reported, "After 10 years of steady decline,
the Shining Path is stirring again. An estimated 150 guerrillas lurk
in the verdant hills above the Ene and Apurimac river valleys,
occasionally venturing from their redoubts in search of new recruits
and easy targets like Mario Ayala." In June, the Washington Post
reported that the Maoists had regrouped in the remote eastern Huallaga
and Apurimac valleys, and stepped up recruitment on college campuses."
"The Shining Path," one of its sources averred, "is at the very least
maintaining its size and expanding its presence." On July 10, 2003,
Maoist guerrillas ambushed a 30-man marine patrol in Ayacucho, killing
seven, including a marine captain, and wounding 10. It was the
Peruvian military's worst loss to rebels in at least four years. On
December 22, 2005, the Maoists again attacked a Peruvian security
forces helicopter, wounding two special operations police during a
counter-insurgency operation near the town of Mazamari, 290 kilometers
east of Lima. Guerrillas also ambushed a police patrol in the Hu�nuco
region near town of Aucayacu, killing eight.

According to the Peruvian government, the Communist Party of Peru
committed 151 acts of violence in 2005. The official line is that the
revival of the movement is the product of an alliance with cocaine
traffickers, or at least coca growers: "These sporadic attacks, when
taken as a whole, represent a clear ability to use force to protect
the coca-growing regions of Peru." The Maoists' opponents have always
smeared them as narco-traffickers, so this statement is unsurprising.
The point of interest is that the Peruvian state must acknowledge that
the movement inaugurated by Guzman (who at his trial on November 5,
2004 faced the media's cameras and shouted, "Glory to
Marxism-Leninism-Maoism!" and "Long Live the People's Heroes of the
People's War!") remains alive in the twenty-first century, from the
Andes to the Himalayas to the South China Sea.

Since April 2002, there has been a Bhutan Communist Party
(Marxist-Leninist-Maoist) rooted among the 100,000 ethnic Nepali
refugees from Bhutan who reside in camps in Nepal. It has circulated
leaflets throughout Bhutan demanding a republic. In June 24, 2004
Nepali security forces arrested six refugees from Bhutan on charges of
involvement with the Maoist movement; the following month the Speaker
of the Bhutan Assembly claimed (somewhat implausibly) that 2,000
Nepali-Bhutanese refugees in Nepal had joined the "Maoists' Army." In
Bangladesh, as recently as January 2003, Maoists captured 20 weapons
from government forces in Daulatpur of Khulna. This occasioned the
anti-Maoist "Operation Clean Heart," involving 10,000 soldiers and
helicopters, and set back plans for a People's War in Bangladesh. In
Turkey, Maoists are involved in some fighting both in Kurdistan and in
the Black Sea region, and in 2005 activists of the Communist Party of
Turkey/Marxist-Leninist (TKP/ML) destroyed five offices of the Justice
and Development Party (AKP), the ruling party, in support of striking
workers, in protest of government effort to privatize state-owned
paper factory, and in protest of the suppression of Women's Day
observances. In June, the military arm of the Kurdistan Worker's
Party, whose armed struggle receives some support from Turkish
Maoists, ended the five-year ceasefire it had observed since the
capture of its leader Abdullah Ocalan. Its thousands of militants now
operate mostly out of northern Iraq. In Iraq itself, a RIM-aligned
organization called Marxist-Leninist Revolutionaries of Iraq was
formed last year.

Here is an incomplete list of Maoist actions in India, Nepal, the
Philippines and Peru so far this month as reported by the mainstream
press:

Jan.1, India: about 100 Maoists attack residence of Rabindranath Kar,
longtime leader of West Bengal's ruling (anti-Maoist) Communist Party
(Marxist) in Bandowan in Purulia. Seize security men's weapons, bomb
house killing Kar and wife. Also attack nearby Kuchia police camp.

Jan. 2, India: To punish railroad construction contractor for
non-payment of revolutionary taxes, Maoists raid laborers' camp at
village Patritand, in Hazaribag Upendra Kumar, destroy half a dozen
dumpers and other railway properties worth over two million rupees.

Jan. 2, Nepal: CPN (Maoist) ends unilateral four-month ceasefire,
explodes bombs damaging government building in Bhairahawa city (on
border with Uttar Pradesh), city council office in Butwal, and police
station in Pokhara (both about 150 miles west of Katmandu). No
casualties reported.

Jan. 4, Philippines: NPA ambush kills 3 (Matnog Municipal Police
Station chief, soldier and Citizens Armed Forces Geographical Units
[CAFGU] member), injure police officer and another soldier in Sorsogon
(southern Luzon).

Jan. 5, Nepal: Maoists attack police checkpoint near Nepalgunj Airport
(on Indian border), kill 3 policemen, seriously injure 2.

Jan. 6, Philippines: NPA raid police stations in Albuera town, Leyte,
seize 32 firearms without firing a single shot.

Jan. 6, Philippines: Using a command-detonated landmine, NPA ambush
National Police at Sitio San Jose, Barangay Canumay, Claveria town,
killing 8s. Maoists seize one cal.30 machine gun, two M-14, four M-16
and one 9mm pistol.

Jan. 8, Nepal: About 25 Maoist cadres detonate two powerful pressure
cooker bombs in the office of the Nepalgunj Municipality.

Jan. 9, Nepal: Eight Maoists storm state-run Rastriya Banijya Bank
branch in Surkhet district in western Nepal, take away at least 3.5
million rupees.

Jan. 11, Nepal: Maoist guerrillas attack at least five targets. Large
contingent storms Dhangadi, headquarters of Kailali district in
far-western Nepal, attacking the district, town and municipal police
offices as well as the district prison and Royal Nepalese Army
barracks. Seize some weapons from police office. At least 7 policemen
killed. Maoists also explode two powerful bombs in the district
development committee building at Bardiya.

[Jan. 13, India: Following the 19th meeting of the Coordination
Committee on Naxalite violence in New Delhi, Union Home Secretary V.K.
Duggal discloses "the level of incidents has gone up by four per cent
in 2005. I don't want to go into the reasons but the challenge in 2006
will be to contain it with an integrated approach."]

Jan. 14, Nepal: Maoists again attack a government office of the
Nepalgunj Municipality, the Number 2 Survey Office. Damage estimated
at 1.5 million rupees.

Jan. 14, Nepal: 16 Maoist rebels and one soldier killed in Syangja in
biggest battle since ceasefire ended.

Jan. 14, Nepal: At least 16 policemen killed in Maoist attacks at
Thankot (dozens) and Dadhikot (about 20) in Bhaktapur district.
(Thankot is major road entry point into the Katmandu Valley with two
million people.) Rebels seize guns and ammunition, flee into hills
shouting revolutionary slogans. Also an explosion at the office of
ward no. 9 of Lalitpur municipality, and bombing of family house of
Chief of Army Staff Pyar Jung Thapa.

Jan. 15, Philippines: about 40 NPA guerillas disguised as army and
police officers sprang nine comrades from a jail in Batangas City,
south of Manila. Eight firearms confiscated from prison guards.

Jan. 15, Philippines: About 30 NPA rebels kill 4 801st Brigade
soldiers and wound 8 in San Jose de Buan in Samar province, southeast
of Manila.

Jan. 15, Nepal: Maoists bomb a recently built city council building
overnight at Lekhnath town, about 200 kilometers (125 miles) west of
Katmandu.

Jan. 16, Philippines: NPA burn ten-wheel hauler truck owned by a town
mayor in Davao in Barangay Maratagas after the mayor refused to pay
revolutionary taxes.

Jan. 16, India: 24-hour bandh called for by CPI (Maoist) to protest
police firing resulting in death of 12 "tribals" and against evictions
to allow for construction of foreign-owned industrial township
paralyzes Jhargram sub-division in Midnapore West, Bengal. Bus
service, schools suspended; shops closed; no visits to public offices.
No reported deaths.

Jan. 16, Peru: Peruvian guerrillas kill 5 policemen and wound an
officer and a prosecutor in an ambush in town of San Francisco in
southern jungle. PCP takes responsibility in a communiqu�, says action
intended to "break the siege of annihilation against the popular war."

[Jan. 15, Nepal: 9 PM-4 AM curfew imposed in Katmandu, other cities.
Phone lines cut, internet services cut, and about 200 politicians and
activists arrested in effort to limit turnout in Friday anti-king
demonstration.]

Jan. 16, Peru: Peruvian guerrillas kill 5 policemen and wound an
officer and a prosecutor in an ambush in town of San Francisco in
southern jungle. PCP takes responsibility in a communiqu�, says action
intended to "break the siege of annihilation against the popular war."

Jan. 17, Philippines: NPA squad from a unit of the Agustin Begnalen
Command clashes with a 54-man contingent of the 41st IB in a
pastureland in Apao, Tineg. Firefight lasts for more than two hours,
as the outnumbered NPA guerillas maneuver in the open pastureland. 5
soldiers killed.

Jan. 18, Nepal: 3 Maoists arriving on bicycle bombed and destroy
television repeater tower in Heated, about 80 kilometers south of
Katmandu, preventing the reception of Nepal Television signals in many
parts of south-central Nepal. Lone employee overpowered; no
casualties.

Jan. 20, Nepal: Maoists attack two security checkpoints in Napalgunj
310 miles west of Katmandu, killing at least 6 policemen and obtaining
weapons and ammunition.

This list focuses on the violent aspect: military attacks, ambushes,
targeted assassinations, seizures of weapons and money, destruction of
property. These are ongoing wars. The catalog does not record the
activities of revolutionary courts, the construction of roads and
bridges, land reform, moves against caste ethnic and sexual
discrimination, and the provisioning where possible of free education
and basic medical care. These constructive enterprises provide people
with a stake in the revolution; they generate the popular support
necessary to sustain People's Wars.

"The Red Army fights not merely for the sake of fighting," Mao wrote
in 1929, "but in order to conduct propaganda among the masses,
organize them, arm them, and help them to establish revolutionary
political power. Without these objectives, fighting loses its meaning
and the Red Army loses the reason for its existence." "The people are
like water," he wrote two decades later, following the defeat of Japan
and as the Communists triumphed over the Guomindang, "and the army is
like fish." Today's Maoist revolutionaries take such words seriously
as they strive to replicate the People's War that produced the
revolution of 1949. So too do their enemies. The U.S. ambassador to
Nepal declared last August, "With a violent, ideological Maoist
insurgency desiring to take over the state and then to export its
revolution to peaceful neighbors, there is much to worry about." But
those who have nothing to lose but their chains respond, today as
always, with enthusiasm to calls for radical change. Their hope is the
flipside of the official dread greeting the resurgence of Maoism in
the new millennium.

Gary Leupp is a Professor of History, and Adjunct Professor of
Comparative Religion, at Tufts University and author of numerous works
on Japanese history. He can be reached at: [email protected].
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1