Virtually all child abduction cases in this country are family abductions, often including legal custody and divorce. However, these are not the cases which concern the public and the police so greatly that the Amber Alert was created (an emergency broadcast system exclusively for missing children). Why? Because people involved in these cases feel they are often working against time. It's only a matter of time before the child is raped then killed. Although most cases of child rape are from a family member, relative, or close friend; and most cases of child murder are from the parents, those families pressing the issue don't want to look inward for problems. Still, this "stranger danger", however rare, is a real danger.

Most cases of child abduction and sexual abuse involving boys are leftover from the eighties or earlier. Today, as I've explained before, the internet has provided those attracted to boys an ever growing community of resources and support. Boylinks is now in the top 1% of sites visited on the internet, a number which shows that the increase over the past thirty years of boys being born attracted to boys has led to a greater community of support, yet a smaller percentage of violent behavior. Some self-hating, emotionally irrational critics (who call themselves "child advocates") still wish to destroy such communities, however (see Making a Monster). With the rise of the internet in the early nineties, we have seen a sharp decline in the number of child abductions of boys by strangers. However, girls are not so lucky.

There are several reasons that girls are in grater danger (which can clearly be seen in recent cases). One I just covered. Another is the steady  change in Caucasian biology in this country (see Boys in the Age of Anti-Masculinity and AOC 1: Biology and Gaps). One way to look at this is to look at child sexual contact with priests (I know, not that topic again, but bear with me) around the world. In countries where there are few to no White priests (such as Mexico), that contact involves almost exclusively, if not exclusively, girls, whereas churches dominated by White priests find that contact involves mostly boys. You see, as I've discussed earlier, Whites have a biological predisposition toward being attracted to their own gender. That's not to say that Whites are not attracted to girls, but that they are more inclined to be attracted to boys than other races. As Whites become more effeminate, each generation becomes increasingly about as likely to rape and kill a child as a woman (which is minimal). Also, age naturally causes hormones to decline, so those Baby Boomers who were born before the transition will still be less likely to commit such crimes. However, this biological change has not had a noticeable effect on the other races, such as Hispanics, Italians, and other races whose men hold the genetic potential for attraction to prepubescent girls (as attraction to post pubescent girls is virtually universal among men of all races) but rarely boys.

Also, girls, along with being more physically vulnerable, are more emotionally vulnerable than boys. Typically, males are better able to deal with those things. Naturally, there are many sensitive males, but most of the emotional upset later in life is over having enjoyed the experience but not wanting to be "gay" or the relationship having ended due to the person being caught and the boy blaming himself. Yet, as girls mature, there isn't the surge of testosterone as in boys, so grown women remain emotionally very weak and will often be even more negatively affected by sexual contact in their past than when it actually occurred. Even things which do not directly effect a woman can "traumatize" her.

Because of these circumstances, a community really must be developed for those attracted to girls. Men will undoubtedly have to start this movement, as they understand the issue. Women, who more often hold a stronger (or singular) attraction to boys, often unwittingly shift the "danger" from where it really is. Also, poverty is a big issue, both in "minorities" and "White Hicks" (ie, Caucasians in warmer climates who undo the biological change by spending so much time in the sun and eating red meat). Many men do not have the same easy access to the internet so many wealthier child-lovers do, so issues of attraction must be discussed openly. After all, it is the repression which makes men feel forced into the crime and the murder to cover up the crime. That, and many child lovers believe a child exposed to sex looses "its" innocence and is valueless (a view which our child-lover society perpetuates). Perhaps if men did more to help girls, there wouldn't be so many women who hate them.