Return to Councils and Synods of The Church


THE COUNCIL OF TRENT (1545 - 1563)


As an answer to the Reformation Doctrines the Roman church implimented what is called "The Counter-Reformation". These actions and doctrines were formulated over a period of nearly 100 years (1545-1643).

The Roman Church today calls the Council of Trent the "Nineteenth Ecumenical Council".


CHARLES V, THE LAST OF THE TRUE HOLY ROMAN EMPERORS, ORDERED IT DISSOLVED.


For over 1,000 years, the sole way that a Church Council or Synod could be Lawfully Convened and Ratified was by a Crowned Head. The case of Council of Trent is a very unusual one. The Roman Church had ongoing disagreements with the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V of Spain. He did authorize a Council, (it was attended by very few prelates, 31 in the first and 213 in the last) and Charles V Decreed it be Convened in his own territories. Trent was an Imperial City.

The Roman Catholic Church, in 1545, did meet there, but disagreements between the Holy Roman Emperor and the Roman Church (Paul III) led to the pope moving the council to the papal states where it was not authorized to be Convened, and then it was suspended in 1547 by Charles V. The pope who came after Paul III was Paul IV. He did not reconvene the council as he feared Spanish influences. It was reconvened in 1551, but again suspended in 1552.

The next pope, Pius IV, reconvened it in 1562 and it completed the work in 1563. Although it appears to have met for several years, for most of this time, the council was in recess because it was later completely suspended by the Emperor Charles V who originally authorized it.

They waited until the original Convocator, Charles V, was dead, then Pius IV reconvened it. Many have pointed out that this was basically illegal.


THE POPE PROCLAIMED A KING OF GERMANY "HOLY ROMAN EMPEROR" WHO WAS NO SUCH THING.


Charles V was the last of the real Holy Roman Emperors. None were truly crowned after him, despite what the papists say. The so-called "emperors" who were later "proclaimed Holy Roman Emperors" by Rome were nothing more than figureheads, kings of Germany with very limited power. The Reformation brought an end to that era.

There is no way that anyone could have overriden Charles V's suspension of the Council of Trent, as he was truly Holy Roman Emperor and they were not. As stated, those who came after him were not truly Holy Roman Emperors at all, even if the pope said they were. They were just kings of Germany and never had the powers Charles V had. Many say that it was an outright farce.

There remains therefore good reason for some to strongly object to this "council" which proclaimed a basically fraudulent "Holy Roman Emperor" after Charles V which in actuality they never were, so their "council" could reject Augustine, approve Arminianism and reject other Biblical Reformation doctrines, and add several other things.

The Protestants, on the other hand, followed Church tradition and The Synod of Dort was Lawfully Convened by Prince Maurice of Holland, to which all the Protestant kings sent Delegates.

The same objection can be made with regard to Vatican II. No Lawful Crowned Head ever Convened Vatican II either!


AN HISTORICAL OVERVIEW


1. Because of the introduction of Arminianism and its unsettling effects on the Protestant Church, the Roman Catholic Church approved Arminianism as a teaching. To do so, Augustine was rejected which the Protestants had used to question Romes' teaching and later condemn Arminianism. To make a way for their new approval of Arminianism, Rome was forced to reject Augustine on Total Depravity, G-ds' Sovereignty in Election, Irresistable Grace and Limited Atonement: all Doctrines previously Accepted by the whole early Church and the Council of Orange, saying Predestination and Election are only related to Gods' Foreknowledge of who would later excersize their own "choice" to believe. Making all mans' choice, denying G-ds' Sovereignty in the Election of Grace. Rome denied outright the Protestant Reformations' teaching of The Doctrine of Eternal Security of the Believer saying certain "human works" must be added for salvation and this was "mans' resposibility" to add them on.

Rome also denied outright the Protestant Reformations' teaching that Etermal Salvation was by:

1. Sola Gratia : Grace Alone

2. Sola Fide : By Faith Alone (Justification by Faith alone)

3. Sola Scriptura : Scripture Only. (Not "Church Traditions")

Rome declared all those things heresies. Here are some rulings from the Council of Trent regarding the rejection of Augustines' teaching, and therefore the rejection of Protestants as heretics:


ROME REJECTS AUGUSTINE


"It (the Augustinian teaching) proceeded from the combined influence of the pre-Augustinian synergism and monastic legalism. Its leading idea is, that divine grace and the human will jointly accomplish the work of conversion and sanctification, and that ordinarily man must take the first step. It rejects the Pelagian doctrine of the moral soundness of man, but rejects the Augustinian doctrine of the entire corruption and bondage of the natural man, and substitutes the idea of a diseased or crippled state of the voluntary power. It disowns the Pelagian conception of grace as a mere external auxiliary; but also, quite as decidedly, the Augustinian doctrines of the sovereignty, irresistibleness, and limitations of grace; and affirms the necessity and the internal operation of grace with and through human agency, a general atonement through Christ, and a predestination to salvation conditioned by foreknowledge of faith."

Council of Trent. See Canons IV, IX, XVII. 6th Session on Justification.


PREVIOUS BELIEFS ABOUT PROPHECY REJECTED


2. Because the Protestant Church said the popes and Rome were Antichrists, Rome had to develop a system to exclude themselves from being identified at all as such. They introduced a system that said there were only two interpretations of Prophecy: Preterist (Past) and Futurist (Future): both pointing away from the popes being "AntiChrists" and their church being the "Beast". Prophecy could be either PAST or definitely FUTURE, but NOT PRESENT. There could be no other interpretations. Romes' view was later adopted by Dispensationalism also (Futurist: Only one man at the end of the "Church Age").

3. The Society of Jesus. (Order of the Jesuits). Organized by Ignatius Loyola in 1540 became the "intellectual branch" of the Romanists. They were dedicated to the belief that Romanism was the sole spiritual authority to be obeyed. Many in this group were devoted to scholarship. It was from this group that the Preterist (Alcazar) and the Futurist (Ribera) interpretations were devised.

4. The establishing of The Index. This was the arm that banned any anti-Romanist publication.

5. The establishment of "The Holy Office". Better known as "The Inquisition". his was the prosecutorial arm of Rome. Under its engines, Halley's Bible Handbook says that over 50,000,000 (fifty million) people perished in the span of 300 years. Also see Foxe's Book of Martyrs.

Rome then institutionalized the mandatory teachings of:


1215: IV Lateran Council. Transubstantiation. Transubstantiaion is based on the 3rd Century B.C. Aristotelian concept of Matter. Aristotle said that matter is composed of two things: "Accident" and "Substance". The "outward" appearances are called "Accidents". The "inward": "Substance". Romanists still believe that the "outward" appears the same, but the "Substance" actually becomes changed into the physical flesh and blood of Jesus Christ; thus the "resacrificing" of Jesus at every Mass. The priest, through "Holy Orders" obtains this ability to participate in this "change" at the Mass from wafer to the actual flesh of Jesus, and from wine to actual physical blood of Jesus.

The Ruling of 1274: Purgatory. The belief that when most people pass from this life, they go neither to Heaven directly nor Hell, but to Purgatory where they suffer in payment for their sins until they have suffered enough to go to Heaven. A Romanist may "pray" relatives out of Purgatory, or "buy" them out by contracting (for a fee) Masses to be said for them.

And several other mandatory teachings such as:

The perpetual virginity of Mary.

The Primacy of the Bishop of Rome.

The mediatorial position of the priesthood (Romanist priests only of course).

The efficacy of Baptism.

Worship of relics.

Prayers to the saints.

The efficacy of the Mass.

Auricular Confessions.

The sale of Indulgencies.

No Salvation outside the Roman Catholic Church.


Many of the teachings above had been previously formulted under Gregory VII.

The following Doctrines have been added since The Council of Trent:


1854: The Immaculate Conception (of Mary; that she herself, in addition to Jesus Christ, was also conceived without sin) under Pope Pius IX.

1870: The Doctrine of the "Infallibility of the pope" when speaking Ex Cathedra:

1917: Mary supposedly appears in Fatima promoting her own "Immaculate Heart", and devotion to it. This popular belief has never been opposed by Rome. As a matter of fact, statues and pictures of Marys' "Immaculate Heart" exposed within her chest are still widely venerated among Romanists today.

1950: The Assumption of Mary: (The Doctrine that because Mary "never sinned" [see "1854: Immaculate Conception", above] that Mary never died, but was miraculously transported directly to heaven) under Pope Pius XII. Romanists do admit this is found nowhere in Scripture, nevertheless it is a mandatory belief for them.

1965: Vatican II. Introduction of 14 positions including "Humanae Vitae" and the "Declaration on Non-Christian Religions" (which declared Hinduism, Buddhism Judaism, Native American religions and Islam) as all "equally valid". This was an unprecedented step and is totally foreign to any Doctrine the Assemblies have ever held.



PEOPLE OF G-D MINISTRIES


� Copyright 2001-2004 People of G-d Ministries, Inc. No reproduction or redistribution without the Prior Written Consent and Approval of People of G-d.

Click Here!


FOOTNOTES


[1]


Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1