The Washington Institute Policy Papers number 38
The Economy of Saudi Arabia : Troubled Present, Grim Future
by Eliyahu Kanovsky
Copyright (C) 1994 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
1828 "L" Street, N.W., Suite 1050
Washington D.C. 20036
III WISHFUL THINKING: SAUDI DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND FISCAL
REALITY, 1980-85
The 1980-85 Development Plan was announced in the spring
of 1980, at a time when both the volume of Saudi exports and the price of
oil were rising rapidly and when conventional forecasts expected a
continuation of both trends. Inside Saudi Arabia, the deficits of the late
1970s were soon forgotten in the wave of new oil revenues and the soothing
assurances of forecasters that the kingdom would begin to accumulate huge
financial surpluses.
Based on these predictions, Saudi Oil Minister Sheik
Ahmed Zaki Yamani stated in 1979 that he expected demand for OPEC oil to
rise from 31 mbd (including Saudi output of 10 mbd) to 35 mbd in 1985 and
42 mbd in 1990, with Saudi output rising first to 15 mbd and then to 20
mbd, respectively. Moreover, in a 1979 article in the Journal of Energy
and Development, he added a special note of caution:
Existing world oil and gas reserves will be depleted at
an alarming rate ... and the [oil] crisis [of the late 1980s] will be of
such magnitude as to make the current situation [the second oil shock]
appear like a mere passing event of trivial importance.... [The West needs
to make] intensified efforts [toward] the development of all forms of
energy, eliminate inefficiencies in energy consumption and conserve [oil].
Undoubtedly, this was advice he would later regret, as
within a few years Saudi Arabia was struggling to increase sales. The
predictions of the near exhaustion of oil reserves also made at that time
by some major oil companies were equally baseless.
The preamble to the development plan for 1980-85
reflects the supreme confidence of the Saudis in the early 1980s:
"The Kingdom is now one of the world's foremost financial powers, in
addition to its role as the major oil exporter of the free world.
The new plan called for total public spending of $390
billion, as compared with planned spending of $142 billion and actual
outlays of $187 billion in the previous five years. A year later, in the
spring of 1981, the deputy minister of planning stated that actual
spending in 1980-85 would probably be about 15 percent higher ($450
billion, averaging around $90 billion per annum). The magnitude of planned
spending can be gauged from the fact that maximum government revenues
before the second oil shock were $38.5 billion in FY1976, while spending
plans in the first half of the 1980s were to average $90 billion annually.
But just as foreign experts erred in ridiculing and
discounting Saudi spending plans in the 1970s, so too did they repeat the
same error following the announcement of the even more ambitious
development plan for 1980-85. In December 1980, the U.S Senate Committee
on Energy and Natural Resources concluded on the basis of
"expert" testimony that "now the [oil] producers are
cutting back on many of their economic development plans and import
requirements. In other words, they projected that although the oil revenue
of Saudi Arabia and others would grow massively, their expenditures would
fall, and their financial surpluses would therefore be huge. Their
predictions were made months after the Saudis announced their most
ambitious development plan and other oil-exporting countries had already
begun boosting their spending.
The broad goals of the new plan were similar to those of
the previous plan, with an even greater emphasis on the diversification of
the economy by developing large-scale industry and modern agriculture.
Investment in infrastructure, health, education, and social services was
to be accelerated and the armed forces were scheduled to receive even
larger allocations. The main constraint foreseen by the planners was
manpower. During the 1970s there was a large influx of foreign labor on
all levels-professional, technical, skilled, and unskilled-that was
creating social and religious problems in the kingdom. The development
plans called for massive investments in education on all levels in order
to minimize and eventually replace many or most of the foreigners.
However, in the short run, the much larger scale of spending planned for
198085 implied an even greater influx of foreigners.
FROM BOOM TO BUST
The oil shock of 1979-80 raised Saudi government oil
revenues to over $96 billion in both FY1980 and FY1981. This was triple
the oil receipts of FY1977. During this period of euphoria in the early
1980s, the budget deficits of the late 1970s were viewed as aberrations.
Government spending rose rapidly from $39 billion in FY1977 to $71 billion
in FY1980-the first year of the 1980-85 development plan-and $84 billion
in the following year. Initially the increase in public expenditures
lagged behind the much higher level of oil revenues, and huge budgetary
surpluses emerged-$34 billion in FY1980 and $25 billion the following
year. This was a repetition, on a much larger scale, of developments that
followed the oil shock of 1973-74.1
Since the government receives and spends the bulk of the
national income, the balance of payments is very strongly effected by
fiscal developments. The deficit of over $2 billion in the balance on
current account in 1978 was soon overwhelmed by unprecedented surpluses of
$42 billion in 1980 and $40 billion in 1981. Imports of goods and services
rose rapidly from $42 billion in 1978 to $84 billion in 1981, but in the
short run they lagged far behind the massive increase in oil export
revenues, which had risen from $37 billion in 1978 to $111 billion in
1981. As a consequence, central bank foreign assets rose sharply from $60
billion in 1978 to $145 billion in mid-1982.2 From there on it was
downhill.
The extremely sharp drop in government oil revenues from
over $96 billion in FY1981 to $54 billion the following year was wholly
unexpected. This is evident from the very wide gap between the finance
ministry's forecast of revenues and actual receipts in FY1982. The
government took some measures to reduce expenditures, but these were far
from sufficient. The fiscal surplus was virtually wiped out in FY1982, and
since FY1983 there have been budget deficits every year. The trends were
similar in the balance of payments. Saudi oil production fell
precipitously from 10 mbd in 1979-81 to 7 mbd in 1982 and the trend
continued until 1985, when production averaged a mere 3.7 mbd.2 At the
same time, oil prices were falling from $33 per barrel in FY1981 to $27
per barrel in 1985.3 The decline in both the volume of exports and prices
reduced oil export revenues in 1985 to less than one-quarter of their 1980
and 1981 levels. The decline in government spending reduced imports but
did not keep pace with the precipitous drop in oil export revenues, and
there has been a deficit in the current account in the balance of payments
every year since 1983. Until the late 1980s, deficits were covered by
drawing down the foreign assets accumulated in the boom years.
AN INITIAL RESPONSE
Saudi public expenditures encompass the following
categories: the projects budget, which focuses largely on the construction
of infrastructure-schools, hospitals, roads, ports, airports, water,
electricity, etc.; foreign aid; military outlays; and various current
civilian expenditures including salaries, subsidies, educational and
health services (which are provided free to all Saudis), various social
services, operations and maintenance of the infrastructure, and others.
When revenues began to decline sharply after 1981, Saudi
authorities began to implement cutbacks mainly in the large projects
budget, where the major contractors and almost all the workers were
foreign, in the expectation that these cutbacks would have little effect
on Saudi nationals. In fact, they did have indirect recessionary effects
that resulted in many bankruptcies of local contractors and other Saudi
businessmen, as well as declines in the prices of real estate and rentals
(because of legal restrictions only Saudis may own real estate). As a
result, some local banks were stuck with worthless promissory notes. The
projects budget was cut back strongly from a peak of $43 billion in FY1981
(including operations and maintenance) to $30 billion in FVI984 and $13
billion in 1989. Proportionately, foreign aid (at least the part that
appears in the budget) was cut back drastically from an annual level of
over $7 billion in the early 1980s to $3 billion in the mid-1980s and less
than $2 billion in the late 1980s.1 Much of Saudi foreign aid is "off
budget," including aid to Iraq during the war with Iran in the 1980s,
some other militia related aid to other Arab countries, and at least part
of Saudi arms imports.
A disinclination to spend within its means is clear in
Saudi Arabia's policy toward military outlays and subsidies. Saudi
military expenditures rose rapidly in the 1970s to an annual level of $9
billion before the 1979-80 oil shock. Subsequently, military spending
doubled to an annual level of $19 billion in the first half of the 1980s.
But the persistent deficits since 1983 persuaded the authorities to
implement some cutbacks. According to the announced budget, annual outlays
were pared to $13-14 billion in the second half of the 1980s. The general
rule was that military spending rose precipitously after each of the oil
shocks but was powerfully resistant to strong cutbacks when oil revenues
plummeted. This was also true of a very wide range of direct and indirect
subsidies and other expenditures. Evidently, the Saudi authorities were
(and appear to remain) wary of the internal discontent that could result
from cutting producer subsidies and aggravating the problems of the
business community, or cutting outlays on wages and salaries in the
burgeoning public sector and causing depressed wages or even unemployment.
Cutting consumer subsidies would lower living standards and add to popular
disaffection.