Total Lunar Eclipse of March 03, 2007
Observation
Report and Comments
Helio de Carvalho Vital
Location: Rio
de Janeiro (22o55`20” S;
43o13`
Instruments: 8¨ f/10 Celestron at 77x;
Atmospheric conditions: Good transparency and
stability; clear skies.
Local altitude of the Moon at mid-eclipse: 27o
Limb and
Mid-Crater Timings
IMMERSIONS |
UTC hh:mm:ss |
EMERSIONS |
UTC hh:mm:ss |
Kepler |
21:48:30 |
Kepler |
00:13:32 |
Tycho |
21:48:58 |
Plato |
00:17:02 |
Aristarchus |
21:53:46 |
Pytheas |
00:19:32 |
Copernicus |
21:57:03 |
Timocharis |
00:22:12 |
Pytheas |
22:02:05 |
Copernicus |
00:22:15 |
Timocharis |
22:08:29 |
Campanus |
00:27:00 |
Dionysius |
22:13:05 |
Aristoteles |
00:28:20 |
Manilius |
22:13:17 |
Eudoxus |
00:30:37 |
Menelaus |
22:17:16 |
Tycho |
00:36:15 |
Plinius |
22:20:28 |
Manilius |
00:38:08 |
Goclenius |
22:21:29 |
Menelaus |
00:41:32 |
Plato |
22:23:19 |
Dionysius |
00:45:58
|
Taruntius |
22:27:10 |
Plinius |
00:46:27
|
Mare Crisium |
22:34:37 |
Censorinus |
00:55:15 |
Limb (U2) |
22:44:18 |
Proclus |
00:56:53
|
|
Taruntius |
01:00:23 |
|
EMERSIONS |
UTC hh:mm:ss |
Goclenius |
01:02:05
|
|
Mare Crisium |
01:01:48
|
|
Limb (U3) |
23:58:23 |
Langrenus |
01:07:25 |
Grimaldi |
00:06:33 |
Limb (U4) |
01:11:48 |
Aristarchus |
00:06:43 |
|
Last naked-eye perception
of the penumbral shade occurred at 01:35 UT, when the magnitude of the
penumbral eclipse was 0.76.
While immersions
occurred at intermediate and high umbral angles (thus
the calculated times were sensitive to the value of oblateness
used), emersions occurred near the Equator so that their times depended mostly
on the radius of the umbra. The good agreement between calculated and observed contact
times indicates that the size and shape of the umbra were close to their
average values determined from previous eclipses we observed. My predictions that assumed an umbral
enlargement factor of 1.90% and 1/250 oblateness in the Meeus`
Model for the umbra.
Estimates of the Magnitude of the Moon
My initial intention
was to use our perfected version of the reversed binoculars method
but I had difficulty in seeing the Moon through them because it was too dim.
That cost me half of totality without magnitude estimates. Then I came up with
another way that worked quite well. I suddenly realized that I could
just take off my glasses (I am short-eyed, hold them at a certain distance
from my eyes (found to be about
Time (in minutes) past mid-eclipse (23:21 UT) |
Estimated Magnitude* of the Moon (±0.3) |
Comparison Star |
3 |
-1.1 |
|
7 |
-1.3 |
|
9 |
-1.6 |
Sirius |
11 |
-1.9 |
Sirius |
17 |
-2.1 |
|
19 |
-2.3 |
|
21 |
-2.4 |
|
31 |
-2.9 |
|
36 |
-3.2 |
|
Faintest visual magnitude of the Moon during the
eclipse: -1.1±0.3 Estimate of the Danjon Number: L=1.8 (moderately
bright eclipse) |
*All estimates
have been corrected for differential atmospheric extinction.
Based on a correlation determined from observation data
from several eclipses we had predicted that the Moon would be shining at
-2.0±0.5 at midtotalityy. Sets of estimates obtained
by our experienced REA
colleagues Alexandre Amorim and Willian Souza
both showed good agreement with ours and also indicated a minimum brightness
corresponding to magnitude -1.1 as plotted below. In average, such magnitude
can be correlated to a Danjon Number equal to L=2.1).
Throughout totality the Moon
remained much brighter than Saturn (mag=0.0) as this
mid-eclipse photo taken by the author shows.
The Moon (lower right) was much
brighter than Saturn (upper left) at 23:21 UT
The fact that the Moon was about
one magnitude fainter than predicted is significant and may suggest that there
are volcanic aerosols suspended in the stratosphere. Since volcanic explosions
with VEI (Volcanic Explosivity
Index) equal or higher than 4 can be a possible source of such pollution, provided they
happen a few months before the eclipse,
then Mount Rabaul in
According to Richard Keen`s formulation,
the corresponding increase in the global optical thickness of the atmosphere
would then be: Δmag/40 = (2.0 – 1.1)/40 = 0.023. A couple of years ago we
made a similar analysis suggesting that the eruption of
Helio de Carvalho Vital
Brazilian
Observational Astronomy Network (REA/Brasil)
|