In this chapter, the main focus is on how management accounting is used
in companies as well as new roles accountants play, which are different from what
they used to be in the past. First of all, management accounting is developed
and used for managers within a company. On the other hand, financial accounting
is used for external parties such as shareholders, banks and government
agencies. Therefore, these two accountings are conceptually different in terms
of their purposes respectively. When companies make decisions, they certainly
need information on cost structure of department or each product. Combined with
the fact that today’s business is getting more complicated and global, the
degree of importance on management accounting has been increasing enormously.
Accordingly, the roles accountants play have been changing. Accountants
are more involved in decision making stage, providing cost information to
facilitate better and proper decision making. Instead of simply doing clerical
works, accountants work closely with operating and sales managers. Since Nike
is profoundly involved in international business and has lots of product lines,
all processes of decision making get intensely complicated. This is where
Nike’s accountants can contribute to lead management to make best decisions,
providing crucial cost information. As a market leader in footwear and apparel
industry, Nike has been aggressively creating new markets along with redefining
old markets. All these actions and strategies need very precise cost and
revenue information given by accountants to keep Nike’s competitive advantage.
Here, it is worth mentioning what the Nike’s value chain is, because
not only value chain is extremely important to companies, but also value chain
and its concept is used throughout all chapters. The following is Nike’s value
chain with regard to the decision Nike conducts and the role accountants play.
·
Research and Development ~ R&D is considered one of the key elements for
Nike to maintain its competitive advantage in the market. Nike’s decision of
R&D is to create high quality products using high technology such as air
sole in footwear to differentiate its products from other rival makers.
Accountants can give information on trends in sales for various products to
seize what consumers' trend and preference are.
·
Design ~
Design is also one of the crucial elements to maintain Nike’s competitive
advantage as well as to keep its popularity among different kind of consumers.
Nike’s decision on design is to create products that fit and match current
consumer taste, sometimes using well-known professional athletes' model, such
as Air Jordan. Accountants can give cost information of numerous models, which
is critical when Nike decides the price of products to retailer.
·
Production ~
Since most of the products are manufactured outside the US by manufacturing
contractor, Nike’s decision of production is to produce at the best price at
the best place. Nike manufactures primarily in Asian countries, due to the
relatively cheap labor cost. Accountants can give information cost taking the
exchange rate into account. And also, transportation cost from various
production places to each destination can contribute to better decision making.
·
Marketing ~
Nike’s decision with regard to marketing is to widely use top professional
athletes to endorse its products. Examples of special model are Michael
Jordan’s basketball products, Andre Agassi’s tennis products, and Tiger Woods' golf products. It is difficult for accountants to exactly measure the added
revenue created by endorsement, however, this is where accountants can give
insights to make better decision using their expertise.
·
Distribution
~ Distribution is extremely important for Nike, due to the fact that Nike sells
its products to almost 20,000 retailers in the US, and 110 countries in the
world. Nike currently has distribution centers in Asia, Australia, Canada,
Europe, Latin America, and the US ("NIKE, Inc.") Selecting the best location
for distribution is key to deliver products to customers in a timely manner.
Accountants can give the shipping and storage cost information to decide where
the best location is and how to distribute products throughout the world.
·
Customer Service ~ Nike’s decision with regard to customer service is to define the
warranty policies and return policies for each product. Accountants can give
the cost information on returned products, which in turn will be an incentive
to build better customer relationship.
2. Chapter
2 ~ Introduction To Cost Behavior And Cost Volume Relationship
This chapter is mainly focused on cost behavior and cost-volume-profit
used by mangers to help guide to better decisions. By understanding cost
behavior, managers can know which part of the cost and profit structure they
can improve. Cost-volume-profit analysis gives mangers an insight of
quantitative cost and profit structure to further improve decisions. The
following example is a typical Nike’s sneaker, assuming that sneaker is sold
for $70 at retail store. This example was taken from Ed Blizt’s article, titled
"How can a $9 sneaker cost $70?" (Blits).
|
Sales to retailer |
|
35.00 |
|
Materials |
9.00 |
|
|
Import duties |
3.00 |
|
|
Rent and equipment |
3.00 |
|
|
Production labor |
2.75 |
|
|
Shipping |
0.50 |
|
|
Suppliers' profit |
1.75 |
|
|
Nike’s cost of the sneaker itself |
|
20.00 |
|
Sales, distribution and Administration |
5.00 |
|
|
Promotion and advertising |
4.00 |
|
|
R&D |
0.25 |
|
|
Nike’s total cost |
|
29.25 |
|
Nike’s profit per sneaker |
|
6.25 |
The material cost is for the rubber, the fabric and/or leather in some cases
and plastic. Suppliers' profit is the amount the manufacturing company wants,
over and above what it costs to make the sneaker after paying rent, equipment
and production labor. This is the cost structure of typical $70 sneaker at
retail store. To make $6.25 of profit for Nike, the total cost of sneaker
itself to retail stores comes to the price of $35.50. Up until now is where
Nike’s accountants should consider and analyze the cost-volume-profit analysis
to help managers improve their decisions. To get to the price of $70, the
following cost structure is presented.
|
Retail sales |
|
70.00 |
|
Cost of the sneaker |
35.50 |
|
|
Personnel |
9.50 |
|
|
Rent |
9.00 |
|
|
Other cost |
7.00 |
|
|
Retail stores' total cost |
|
61.00 |
|
Retail stores' profit per sneaker |
|
9.00 |
Personnel include the salesperson’s payment and rent is for the space
in the shopping center. Other cost includes advertising, shopping bag and other
costs needed to operate the retail store.
3. Chapter
3 ~ Management Of Cost Behavior
Since companies usually have more control over their costs than their
revenues, controlling and reducing costs are the ultimate goal for accountants.
This chapter is focused on cost behavior, using various kind of costs, such as
step costs, mixed costs, capacity costs, committed fixed costs, and
discretionary fixed costs. Moreover, three methods, high-low method, visual-fit
method and least-square regression, are presented to forecast the future cost.
The following analysis is based on least-square regression. The reason this
method was chosen to forecast the cost-of-goods-sold is that this method uses
all data available and the analysis is based on statistical analysis, which is
much more reliable and objective than high-low and visual-fit method.
Furthermore, by calculating the R-squared, the goodness of fit of the
predicted-equation can be found.
(Dollars in million)
|
Qtr |
Revenue (X) |
COGS (Y) |
Gross Margin |
Gross Margin % |
|
1998-1st |
2766.1 |
1665.5 |
1100.6 |
39.79% |
|
1998-2nd |
2255.3 |
1409.5 |
845.8 |
37.50% |
|
1998-3rd |
2224.0 |
1428.9 |
795.1 |
35.75% |
|
1998-4th |
2307.7 |
1561.6 |
746.1 |
32.33% |
|
1999-1st |
2504.8 |
1562.6 |
942.2 |
37.62% |
|
1999-2nd |
1913.0 |
1229.6 |
683.4 |
35.72% |
|
1999-3rd |
2176.8 |
1364.9 |
811.9 |
37.30% |
|
1999-4th |
2182.3 |
1336.4 |
845.9 |
38.76% |
|
2000-1st |
2501.1 |
1482.7 |
1018.4 |
40.72% |
(All data are taken from Nike Annual Report 1999)
|
SUMMARY OUTPUT OF QUARTERLY
ANALYSIS |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regression Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple R |
0.9243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Square |
0.8543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted R Square |
0.8335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Error |
54.6468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observations |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANOVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
df |
SS |
MS |
F |
Significance F |
|
|
Regression |
1 |
122539.9113 |
122539.9113 |
41.0344 |
0.0004 |
|
|
Residual |
7 |
20903.8843 |
2986.2692 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
8 |
143443.7956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coefficients |
Standard Error |
t Stat |
P-value |
Lower 95% |
Upper 95.0% |
|
Intercept |
284.8837 |
182.6508 |
1.5597 |
0.1628 |
-147.0165 |
716.7839 |
|
Quarterly revenue |
0.5030 |
0.0785 |
6.4058 |
0.0004 |
0.3173 |
0.6887 |
Yi = b0 + b1Xi + ei --- Y = 284.8837 + 0.5030X
Interpretation
of key numbers for quarterly analysis
·
b0 = 284.8837 ~ No
economic interpretation is appropriate, since Xi = 0 is not within the range of
observed values.
·
b1 = 0.5030 ~ On the average,
within the range of observed values for each 1 million dollars increase in the
quarterly revenue, the cost-of-goods-sold per quarter increases 0.5030 million
dollars, other things held constant.
·
R-squared = 85.43% ~ Within
the range of observed values, variation in quarter revenue explains 85.43% of
the variation in cost-of-goods-sold per quarter.
(Dollars in million)
|
Yr |
Revenue (X) |
COGS (Y) |
Gross Margin |
Gross Margin % |
|
1989 |
1710.8 |
1074.8 |
636 |
37.18% |
|
1990 |
2235.2 |
1384.1 |
851.1 |
38.08% |
|
1991 |
3003.6 |
1850.5 |
1153.1 |
38.39% |
|
1992 |
3405.2 |
2089.1 |
1316.1 |
38.65% |
|
1993 |
3931 |
2377 |
1554 |
39.53% |
|
1994 |
3789.7 |
2301.5 |
1488.2 |
39.27% |
|
1995 |
4760.8 |
2865.2 |
1895.6 |
39.82% |
|
1996 |
6470.6 |
3906.7 |
2563.9 |
39.62% |
|
1997 |
9186.5 |
5503 |
3683.5 |
40.10% |
|
1998 |
9553.1 |
6065.5 |
3487.6 |
36.51% |
|
1999 |
8776.9 |
5493.5 |
3283.4 |
37.41% |
(All data are taken from Nike Annual Report 1999)
|
SUMMARY OUTPUT OF YEARLY ANALYSIS |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regression Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple R |
0.9988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Square |
0.9976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted R Square |
0.9973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Error |
91.9002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observations |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANOVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
df |
SS |
MS |
F |
Significance F |
|
|
Regression |
1 |
31656796.78 |
31656796.78 |
3748.30 |
0.0000 |
|
|
Residual |
9 |
76010.74 |
8445.64 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
10 |
31732807.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coefficients |
Standard Error |
t Stat |
P-value |
Lower 95% |
Upper 95% |
|
Intercept |
-35.1814 |
59.2866 |
-0.5934 |
0.5675 |
-169.2972 |
98.9344 |
|
Annual revenue |
0.6212 |
0.0101 |
61.2234 |
0.0000 |
0.5982 |
0.6441 |
Yi = b0 + b1Xi + ei --- Y = -35.1814 + 0.6212X
Interpretation
of key numbers for yearly analysis
·
b0 = -35.1814 ~ No
economic interpretation is appropriate, since Xi = 0 is not within the range of
observed values.
·
b1 = 0.6212 ~ On the
average, within the range of observed values for each 1 million dollars
increase in the annual revenue, the cost-of-goods-sold per year increases
0.6212 million dollars, other things held constant.
·
R-squared = 99.76% ~
Within the range of observed values, variation in yearly revenue explains
99.76% of the variation in cost-of-goods-sold per year.
Using a revenue of 1964.00 million dollars in 2nd quarter of
fiscal 2000 and a revenue of 9477.10 million dollars, predicted by Esquivel and
Goldman of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, the following is the forecast of
cost-of-goods-sold (Esquivel and Goldman).
|
2nd Quarter of 2000 |
|
Fiscal 2000 |
|
Y =
284.8837+0.5030X |
|
Y =
-35.1814+0.6212X |
|
Y = 284.8837+0.5030(1964.00) |
Y =
-35.1814+0.6212(9470.10) |
|
|
Y =
284.8837+987.892 |
|
Y =
-35.1814+5887.17 |
|
Y =
1272.78 |
|
Y =
5851.99 |
Consequently, gross margin will be 35.19% in 2nd
quarter of fiscal 2000 and 38.25% in fiscal 2000 respectively.
By scrutinizing the cost
behavior, Nike could reduce operating expenses by almost $200 million in fiscal
1999. Two important points deserve mentioning here. First, cutting an
additional 9 percent of workforce contributed to $200 million reduction. Other point
is that Nike could cut inventories by 14 percent and reduce working capital
needs (Nike Annual Report 1999). For Nike’s accountants, providing cost
behavior information to managers will further give opportunities to reduce
cost.
4. Chapter
5 ~ Relevant Information And Decision Making: Marketing Decision
When management makes marketing decisions, the key focus should be on
relevant information. Sharp distinctions between relevant and irrelevant
information are needed to make proper decisions. Accountants must have a sound
understanding of this relevant information to be able to provide technical
expertise on both financial and managerial aspects. This chapter is focused on
how relevant information is important on the decision making phase for
organizations under situations such as special sales order, adding or deleting
products and resources constrain capacity.
Other
important focus, which is also related to relevant information, is on the
concept of pricing. Pricing decision is critical for companies to raise
revenues as well as to penetrate the market further. Nike has penetrated the
market more profoundly than any other competitors, keeping its market share in
terms of sale units approximately 50 percent. Combined with the brand recognition
and brand loyalty, Nike can take strong pricing strategy compared to its
competitors. Therefore, Nike’s accountants must take into account this market
share advantage when they provide information to managers.
Pricing
decisions depend on the characteristics of the market companies are involved.
Nike is involved in imperfect competition, which is a market where the price a
company charges for a unit will influence the quantity of units it sells. In
more detail, Nike is in a tight oligopoly market, due to the extremely high
concentration ratio. The four-firm ratio is 85.77%, calculated by adding the
percentage of sales accounted for by the top firms in a footwear industry. In
such a market condition, demand of footwear is downward slope, while marginal cost
slope declines first but gradually goes up as the volume in units increases as
usual. Consequently, Nike’s accountants must pay attention to the marginal
cost, because it is relevant for pricing decisions.
5. Chapter
7 ~ The Master Budget
Budgets are a manager’s key enabler to understand, plan and smoothly
control operations. After budget is set up, organizations can have much higher
incentives to plan and also control, pursuing the budgeted target. Moreover,
budgets help evaluate employee performance by comparing to the previous budget
or difference between the budget. Accountants' role is to work extensively with
people who work for operations and finance department to get required
information to set up organization budgets. This chapter is particularly
focused on the master budget along with a different kind of budgets, such as
capital budget, continuous budget and cash budget. Since budget information is
classified as confidential not only in Nike, but also in every organization,
the following part is primarily focused on general characteristics of budget in
organization.
In spite of the fact that budgeting is very time-consuming and
difficult to set up precisely, advantages of budgets exceed these
disadvantages. First of all as stated above, budgeting compels managers to
think ahead and plan for the budgeted targets under changing conditions. Even
though Nike is the market leader, Nike has to be well prepared due to the
aggressive competitors and unstable global economic condition. Judging performance
is another advantage that budgeting brings to organizations. Budget brings a
wide framework of judging criteria. Finally, budgeting aids managers in
coordinating their efforts to let all employees know what managers are
expecting for the goal. With managers' deep commitment and wide support from
employees in each department, the objective of the organization as whole
matches the objective of each employee and department.
Budget can be divided into several categories, depending on the nature
of its strategic plan and duration. Capital budget is a detail planned
expenditure of facilities, equipment and new products, and therefore, it tends
to take a long duration into account. On the other hand, master budget consists
of two components: operating budget and financial budget. While operating
budget consists of sales budget, purchase budget, cost-of-goods-sold budget,
operating expense budget and budgeted income statement, financial budget
consists of capital budget, cash budget and budgeted balance sheet. The
operating budget focuses on the income statement and its supporting schedules.
In contrast, the financial budget focuses on the effects that operating budget
and other plans will have on cash. Here, every accountant in organization must
work collaboratively with operating and finance department to set up precise
and valuable master budget.
When setting up the budget, the sales budget becomes the fundamental
part because other budgets are derived from it sequentially. This initial sales
budget strongly contributes to time-consuming and a difficulty of building
master budget, due to the fact that sales budget contains a certain degree of
uncertainty. Forecasting the exact future sales is extremely difficult that
organizations allow a certain level of margin error. This in term affects the
whole master budget. In order to build a better sales budget, organizations
must take into account the historical sales pattern, economics conditions,
marketing plan, competitors' actions, buyers' trend and purchasing power,
product prices and so forth.
6. Chapter
8 ~ Flexible Budgets And Variance Analysis
The master budget, mentioned in chapter 7, assumes fixed level of
activity. Accordingly, when the actual units sold is different from that of
master budget unit, the difference affects the rest of the actual numbers and
they will likely to be completely different from master budget, reflecting an
inflexible comparison. In order to overcome this inflexible comparison,
flexible budget is presented in this chapter along with the variance analysis.
Flexible budget adjusts for changes in sales volume and other
cost-driver activities so that it leads managers help focus on a certain area
of financial performance that deserves attention. Flexible budget also helps
managers explain why the master budget was not achieved. The difference between
master budget and actual results, called master budget variances, can be
divided into two variances. One is flexible-budget variance, which is the
variance between flexible budget and actual result, and another is
sales-activity variance, which is the variance between master budget and
flexible budget. Flexible-budget variances measure organizations' degree of
efficiency in meeting financial plans for which operations managers are
primarily responsible. On the other hand, sales-activity variances measure
organizations' degree of effectiveness for which marketing managers are
primarily responsible. The following hypothetical example is based on the data
used in chapter 2.
|
Nike’s
hypothetical performance for a month |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
Master Budget |
|
Variance |
|
|
Units |
8,000 |
|
10,000 |
|
2,000 |
U |
|
Sales |
284,000 |
|
355,000 |
|
71,000 |
U |
|
Variable
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
76,800 |
|
90,000 |
|
13,200 |
F |
|
Import duties |
24,000 |
|
30,000 |
|
6,000 |
F |
|
Rent and equipment |
25,090 |
|
30,000 |
|
4,910 |
F |
|
Production labor |
30,890 |
|
27,500 |
|
3,390 |
U |
|
Shipping |
3,800 |
|
5,000 |
|
1,200 |
F |
|
Suppliers' profit |
14,600 |
|
17,500 |
|
2,900 |
F |
|
Total variable costs |
175,180 |
|
200,000 |
|
24,820 |
F |
|
Contribution
Margin |
108,820 |
|
155,000 |
|
46,180 |
F |
|
Fixed
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed SG&A |
50,000 |
|
50,000 |
|
- |
- |
|
Fixed promotion/advertisement |
40,300 |
|
40,000 |
|
300 |
U |
|
Fixed R&D |
2,500 |
|
2,500 |
|
- |
- |
|
Total fixed costs |
92,800 |
|
92,500 |
|
300 |
U |
|
Operating
income |
16,020 |
|
62,500 |
|
46,480 |
U |
(U = Unfavorable variance, F = Favorable
variance)
|
Nike's budgeted formula per unit |
|
Flexible budgets for various level |
|||||
|
Units |
|
|
8,000 |
|
10,000 |
|
12,000 |
|
Sales |
35.50 |
|
284,000 |
|
355,000 |
|
426,000 |
|
Variable
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
9.00 |
|
72,000 |
|
90,000 |
|
108,000 |
|
Import duties |
3.00 |
|
24,000 |
|
30,000 |
|
36,000 |
|
Rent and equipment |
3.00 |
|
24,000 |
|
30,000 |
|
36,000 |
|
Production labor |
2.75 |
|
22,000 |
|
27,500 |
|
33,000 |
|
Shipping |
0.50 |
|
4,000 |
|
5,000 |
|
6,000 |
|
Suppliers' profit |
1.75 |
|
14,000 |
|
17,500 |
|
21,000 |
|
Total variable costs |
20.00 |
|
160,000 |
|
200,000 |
|
240,000 |
|
Contribution
Margin |
15.50 |
|
124,000 |
|
155,000 |
|
186,000 |
|
Nike's budgeted formula per month |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed SG&A |
50,000 |
|
50,000 |
|
50,000 |
|
50,000 |
|
Fixed promotion/advertisement |
40,000 |
|
40,000 |
|
40,000 |
|
40,000 |
|
Fixed R&D |
2,500 |
|
2,500 |
|
2,500 |
|
2,500 |
|
Total fixed costs |
92,500 |
|
92,500 |
|
92,500 |
|
92,500 |
|
Operating
income |
|
|
31,500 |
|
62,500 |
|
93,500 |
|
Summary of performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
Flexible Budget Variance |
|
Flexible Budget |
|
Sales-Activity Variance |
|
Master Budget |
|
Units |
8,000 |
|
- |
- |
8,000 |
|
2,000 |
U |
10,000 |
|
Sales |
284,000 |
|
- |
- |
284,000 |
|
71,000 |
U |
355,000 |
|
Variable
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials |
76,800 |
|
4,800 |
U |
72,000 |
|
18,000 |
F |
90,000 |
|
Import duties |
24,000 |
|
- |
- |
24,000 |
|
6,000 |
F |
30,000 |
|
Rent and equipment |
25,090 |
|
1,090 |
U |
24,000 |
|
6,000 |
F |
30,000 |
|
Production labor |
30,890 |
|
8,890 |
U |
22,000 |
|
5,500 |
F |
27,500 |
|
Shipping |
3,800 |
|
200 |
F |
4,000 |
|
1,000 |
F |
5,000 |
|
Suppliers' profit |
14,600 |
|
600 |
U |
14,000 |
|
3,500 |
F |
17,500 |
|
Total variable costs |
175,180 |
|
15,180 |
U |
160,000 |
|
40,000 |
F |
200,000 |
|
Contribution
Margin |
108,820 |
|
15,180 |
U |
124,000 |
|
31,000 |
U |
155,000 |
|
Fixed
costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed SG&A |
50,000 |
|
- |
- |
50,000 |
|
- |
- |
50,000 |
|
Fixed promotion/advertisement |
40,300 |
|
300 |
U |
40,000 |
|
- |
- |
40,000 |
|
Fixed R&D |
2,500 |
|
- |
- |
2,500 |
|
- |
- |
2,500 |
|
Total fixed costs |
92,800 |
|
300 |
U |
92,500 |
|
- |
- |
92,500 |
|
Operating
income |
16,020 |
|
15,480 |
U |
31,500 |
|
31,000 |
U |
62,500 |
In this hypothetical example, flexible-budget variance was calculated to
be $15,480, implying less efficiency of Nike’s performance. And also,
sales-activity variance was calculated to be $31,000, implying a lack of
effectiveness of performance. Totally, master budget variance was calculated to
be $46,480 as unfavorable variance. When organizations have variances, each
significant variance deserves further consideration and analysis. By explaining
why a variance occurs, managers are able to recognize changes, focusing on the
real problem.
7. Chapter
9 ~ Management Control System And Responsibility Accounting
So far, many important tools that managers in organizations can utilize
have presented such as relevant costing, budgeting and variance analysis.
Although, each tool is very useful by itself, it becomes much more useful when
each tool is integrated in part of management control system. Management
control system is a logical integration of techniques to gather and use
information to plan organization-wide goal, to make better decisions, to motivate
and evaluate employee, and to monitor performance as well as the achievement of
the organizational goal. The first step is to identify the organizational goal
or mission.
Nike’s goal or mission is to become a truly global sports and fitness
company ("NikeBiz| Inside Nike| Bio Knight.") As the biggest footwear and
apparel company in the world, Nike has been seeking a new market aggressively.
In fact, fiscal 1999 results showed that 43 percent of total Nike’s annual
sales came from outside the US. Since the US’s market is relatively matured and
saturated, Nike believes its further growth in the international market,
especially in Europe and Asia. In terms of manufacturing aspect, Nike virtually
manufactures all of its footwear products outside the US (98 percent in Asian
countries), while it manufactures some of the apparel products in the US (Nike
Form 10-K 1999). Combined with the extremely harsh competition and the rapid
changes in technology along with the consumer trend, Nike has to particularly
focus on R&D, design and distribution among its value-chain, mentioned in
chapter 1. Those three value-chain elements are Nike’s key success factors to
achieve or drive towards its goal.
For Nike to achieve its goal, responsibility accounting can be applied
in management control system. Responsibility accounting is to identify what
parts of the organization have primary responsibility for each objective based
on value-chain activity to develop performance measures and targets and to
design reports of these measures by subunit or responsibility center. Another
substantial factor that plays an important role to achieve organizational goal
is associated with employee. Organizational goal cannot be achieved with only a
strong management leadership or a management commitment. A certain level of
high employees' commitment and involvement is necessary, especially when
organizations' priority is on quality. Total quality management (TQM) has been
one of the efficient management philosophies to improve quality as well as the
customer satisfaction since 1980s' however, there are lots of cases that
organizations have abandoned or reduced their efforts of TQM program. One of
the main reasons has been less employees' commitment and involvement. Here, not
only Nike’s management but also any other management in organizations should
create a system that motivates employees with a transparent and fair reward
system. Once individuals' self-interest by highly motivated employees aligns
with organizational goal, organizations can seize a higher prosperous
stage.
8. Chapter
10 ~ Management Control In Decentralized Organization
Nike has showed a tremendous growth rate in terms of its annual sales
revenue in the past decade. Although, Nike experienced decline in sales revenue
for the first time in five years, Nike achieved progress in terms of its
financial analysis. The following table shows some of Nike’s progresses.
|
|
1999 |
|
Change % |
|
1998 |
|
Gross
Margin % |
37.4% |
|
0.9% |
|
36.5% |
|
ROE |
13.7% |
|
1.2% |
|
12.5% |
|
ROA |
8.5% |
|
1.1% |
|
7.4% |
|
Current
ratio |
2.3 |
|
0.2 |
|
2.1 |
(Numbers are calculated
by using data taken from Nike Annual Report 1999)
This strong revenue growth was derived from the international
marketing strategy. In fact, Nike considers international market as a critical
strategy to gain further sales revenue since the US’s market is relatively
matured as mentioned in chapter 9.
Some
macroeconomic factors give incentives and opportunities for Nike to penetrate
international market more profoundly. Among one of them is China’s status of
Normal Trade Nation ~NTR (previously "Most Favored Nation ~ MFN"), which was
extended to June 2000 by the Clinton administration in June 1999 (Nike Form
10-K 1999). China is not only a material source of footwear production for
Nike, bit also a great potential of future market, taking into account its
population and its economic growth. The financial crisis, occurred in Asian
countries in 1997, undermined the Asian economy as whole, however, it seems the
worst situation has passed and Asian countries are coming back as the recent
stock markets show. Asian market will be one of the most important markets for
Nike to sustain its growth.
Another
macroeconomic factor is international pact such as WTO signed among GATT
nations and NAFTA singed among the US, Canada and Mexico. Due to these
agreements, Nike can appreciate considerably cuts on global tariffs on many
products. Finally, with respect to Europe market, GDP will grow in all European
countries from 2.1 in 1999 to 2.8 in 2000, indicating Europe will continue to
be a strong revenue-driven market ("Economic Indicators").
Even though Nike has high degree of
international operations, Nike has decentralized organizational structure.
Critical decisions are made at the local level where each country has its own
culture or market nature. Example can be found in German, where Nike signed an
endorsement contract with Formula-1 champion driver Michael Schumacher. He does
not have much impact on the US’s market, however, he has a big influence on
Germany as well as on Europe market. Another example can be found in Japan,
where Nike has endorsement contract with Japanese professional soccer player
and uses him in TV commercial as one of the marketing strategies. If Nike were
not decentralized, these contracts could not have made or could have taken
longer time. The more organizations become diversified, the more they should be
decentralized to make critical decisions at the place where they occurred. Nike
has integrated its nature of decentralized structure into the management
control systems very well, which allows Nike to respond to each market more
quickly at the best time.
9. Chapter
11 ~ Capital Budgeting
This chapter is focused on one of the essential business activities,
capital budgeting. Capital budgeting is the long-term planning for making and
financing investments that affect financial result over more than a year. A
several capital budgeting models can be used, such as net-present-value (NPV)
method, payback period and accounting rate-of-return (ARR) method. NPV method,
the most popular version of discount-cash-flow model, computes the present
value of all expected future cash flows using a minimum desired rate of return.
If the NPV becomes positive value after the calculation, it is basically the
sign to carry out the new project. Payback period measure the time the project
takes to recoup the initial dollars investment, and ARR method expresses a project’s
return as the increase in expected average annual operating income divided by
the initial required investment. Even though ARR has profitability as an
objective, both payback period and ARR method ignore the time value of money.
Consequently, most of organizations use NPV method as capital budgeting model.
The most recent project launched by Nike was "World Shoe" project,
which is aimed at markets in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Priced at $15 a
pair, the World Shoe is a canvas shoe, made with technology Nike pioneered in
the 1970s', and it is specifically designed for developing countries
where Nike has manufacturing plants but does little business (Dworkin). The
World Show will not be sold in the US or other developed countries not to cannibalize
Nike’s own advanced and expensive shoes. This World Shoe strategy coincides
with Nike’s corporate strategy that is to expand its international market.
Since the target markets are developing countries, one thing deserves to note
here. Developing countries have relatively high or sometimes extremely high
inflation rates. Countries in South America, such as Brazil and Argentina have
triple-digit annual inflation rates that have considerable effects on cash flow
predictions. Nike should consider the inflation thoroughly on capital-budgeting
decision stage.
|
Consumer Price Inflation By Decade |
||
|
Argentina |
|
4,908.40 |
|
Brazil |
|
90,997,300 |
|
Hong Kong |
|
89.44 |
|
Japan |
|
12.91 |
|
South Korea |
|
69.71 |
|
Philippines |
|
128.08 |
|
Singapore |
|
18.88 |
|
USA |
|
30.45 |
(Source:
http://www.glbalfindata.com/tbcpi.htm)
10. Chapter 15 ~ Overhead Application: Variable And
Absorption Costing
In this chapter, two major methods of product costing are compared. One
is variable costing and another is absorption costing. The only and decisive
difference between both methods is that fixed manufacturing overhead is
excluded from the cost of products under variable costing but is included in
the cost of products under absorption costing. Absorption costing is more
widely used because variable costing is not allowed for external-reporting or
tax purposes. However, a number of organizations uses variable costing due to
its usefulness on performance measurement by removing the impact of changing
inventory levels from financial results. The following example is Nike’s
standard costs for production of sneakers used in chapter 2.
|
Direct material |
|
$9.00 |
Direct labor
|
|
2.75 |
|
Variable manufacturing overhead |
|
8.25 |
|
Standard variable costs per sneaker |
|
$20.00 |
Fixed manufacturing overhead is budgeted at $42,500.
Expected production in each month is 10,000 sneakers, and the sales price is $35
per sneaker. And also, both budgeted and actual selling and administrative
expenses are $50,000 monthly. Actual product quantities are:
|
January |
|
February |
|
|
Operating inventory |
- |
|
3,000 |
|
Production |
12,000 |
|
9,000 |
|
Sales |
9,000 |
|
11,000 |
|
Ending inventory |
3,000 |
|
1,000 |
There are no variances from the standard variable
manufacturing costs, and the actual fixed manufacturing overhead incurred is exactly
$42,500. Based on the above information, the following is Nike’s income
statement using variable costing and absorption costing.
|
(Variable Costing) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
February |
||
|
Sales, 9,000 and 11,000 sneakers |
|
|
$315,000 |
|
|
|
$385,000 |
|
Variable expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable manufacturing COGS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating inventory, at standard variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cost of $20 |
|
- |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
Add: variable cost of goods manufactured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at standard, 12,000 and 9,000 sneakers |
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
Available for sale, 12,000 sneakers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each month |
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
Deduct: ending inventory, at standard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variable cost of $20 |
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Variable manufacturing COGS |
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
Total variable expenses |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
Contribution margin |
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
165,000 |
|
Fixed expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed manufacturing overhead |
|
42,500 |
|
|
|
42,500 |
|
|
Fixed selling and administrative expenses |
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
Total fixed expenses |
|
|
92,500 |
|
|
|
92,500 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
$42,500 |
|
|
|
$72,500 |
|
(Absorption Costing) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
February |
|
||
|
Sales |
|
|
$315,000 |
|
|
|
$385,000 |
|
|
Cost of goods sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening inventory, at standard absorption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cost of $24.50 |
|
- |
|
|
|
73,500 |
|
|
|
Cost of goods manufactured at standard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of $24.50 |
|
294,000 |
|
|
|
220,500 |
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
294,000 |
|
|
|
294,000 |
|
|
|
Deduct: ending inventory at standard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
absorption cost of $24.50 |
|
73,500 |
|
|
|
24,500 |
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold, at standard |
|
|
220,500 |
|
|
|
269,500 |
|
|
Gross profit at standard |
|
|
94,500 |
|
|
|
115,500 |
|
|
Production-volume variance |
|
|
8,500 |
F |
|
|
4,250 |
U |
|
Gross profit at "actual" |
|
|
103,000 |
|
|
|
111,250 |
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
42,500 |
|
|
|
42,500 |
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
$60,500 |
|
|
|
$68,750 |
|
Standard absorption cost = 42,500/10,000 + 20 = $24.50
Computation of production-variance based on expected
volume of production of 10,000 sneakers:
|
January |
8500 |
F |
|
(12,000-10,000) x 4.25 |
|
February |
4,250 |
U |
|
(9,000-10,000) x 4.25 |
|
Two months together |
4,250 |
F |
|
(21,000-20,000) x 4.25 |
U = Unfavorable, F =
Favorable
|
(Comparison Table) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Costing |
|
|
Absorption Costing |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$385,000 |
|
Revenue |
|
$385,000 |
|
All variable cost |
|
220,000 |
|
all manufacturing costs |
|
273,750 |
|
Contribution margin |
|
165,000 |
|
Gross margin |
|
111,250 |
|
All fixed costs |
|
92,500 |
|
All nonmanufacturing costs |
|
42,500 |
|
Operating income |
|
$72,500 |
|
Operating income |
|
$68,750 |
As the results show, whenever sales exceed production, that is, when
inventory decreases, variable-costing income is greater than absorption-costing
income. And also, production does not affect operating income under variable
costing, which can prevent managers from producing unneeded units just to
increase operating income under absorption costing. One thing is worth to note
here that if organizations implement just-in-time production system, there is
no difference between variable costing and absorption costing due to the
sharply reduced inventory levels.
List of References
Textbook:
Horngren, Charles T, Gary L. Sundem, and William O. Strattoon. Introduction to management accounting. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1999
Blitz, Ed. "How can a $9 sneaker cost $70?" 1998. Union Tribune. Online. Available: http://nikebiz.com/media/n_shoecst.shtml. November 20 1999.
Dworkin, Andy. "Nike aims low-cost canvas footwear at developing markets." The Oregonian, Portland, Ore. (1999) Online. EBSCO / Newspaper Source. November 21 1999.
"Economic Indicators." Economist. 18 September 1999: 114.
Esquivel, Josephine R, and Lora Goldman. "NIKE (NKE): Analyst Meeting in London Upbeat; Reiterate Strong Buy." Morgan Stanley Dean Witter U.S. Investment Research. (1999): 11pp. Online. Research Bank Web. November 25 1999.
"Global Financial Data CPI Data." Global Financial Data. Online Available: http://www.glbalfindata.com/tbcpi.htm. November 28 1999
"NIKE Inc." Hoover’s Company Profiles. 1999. Online. NC LIVE / EBSCO. November 21 1999.
"NikeBiz| Inside Nike| Bio Knight." nikebiz.com. Online Available: http://www.nikebiz.com/story/b_knight.shtml. November 29 1999.
Nike Annual Report 1999
Nike Form 10-K 1999