
Arab op-ed: "Learn a lesson"
Ramallah's AL AYAM 5/22/99--op-ed by Dr. 'Ali al-Hirbawi: "...It is noteworthy
that the overall Arab conclusions regarding the Israeli elections were focused on the
results, not on the content of the elections. We have followed up and watched these
elections as if they were our own. What a shame!
If we look at the Israeli elections from another perspective that is much profounder,
we can conclude that they were genuine elections which have introduced a change to the
political life of Israeli society.
They were not sham elections intended to justify the continuation of the leader in
power forever. Binyamin Netanyahu was given the title of "King of Israel."
Nonetheless, he quickly fell and resigned from the leading post of his party.
The lesson we can learn from this is not to gloat over Netanyahu's defeat. The lesson
is much more important than that. The lesson we should learn is that we should appreciate
the significance of real elections that express changing public opinion, not the
motionless public opinion that will remain inactive as long as the leader of the country
is in power and can only be removed by a coup or death.
The lesson to be learned from the Israeli election also is that a dynamic public
opinion can be influential in changing the political situation and this public opinion can
be created. In order to create such a public opinion, we need to have legally-guaranteed
mechanisms that primarily protect the freedom of expression, in deeds, not in words only.
A citizen should be entitled to express his views freely without fear that he might be
pursued by the security services of the ruling regime. The media should be free and
independent to judge events and officials as they really see them without being subject to
censorship or fear of retribution.
This is what, in fact, enables the media to judge government leaders, who are
responsible for charting the policy of the state, when they are still in office and during
their lifetime, not after they are removed from office or after their death.
Under these circumstances of freedom, the election process becomes an interesting
process because it is backed up by the mechanism of political change. It is this mechanism
which creates political motion. Consequently, you can find in a society alliances formed
and parliamentary blocs created as an extension of forces and opinions that exist within
that society. A political coalition becomes a body that has a meaningful content.
Such elections can only be produced by a democratic system which can allow, as a basis
for its government, the peaceful transfer of power through elections. In the Arab World,
however, no real elections are held. Thus political stagnation is the basis of the
political process.
At the center of this process, it is the "leader of the march" who is
important, and what is required is to have his regime sustained and continued. Once he is
out of the political picture, even his followers start to slander him and to talk about
the excesses of the defunct regime. It is this kind of weird situation which leaves no
room for a public opinion to form or become influential.
Thus you find most people trying to stay away from politics, because it is safer for
them to do so. Political indifference has spread among the people although the issues at
stake are crucial for the future of the country.
Don't you think that this is one of the major reasons for the continuation of Arab
setbacks and defeats?"

PA and Syrian distrust
London's AL QUDS AL ARABI 5/24/99: "Palestinian-Syrian rapprochement still face
many hurdles because of the lack of positive response on the part of the Syrian officials
to the mediations in this context, and particularly those undertaken by Egyptian President
Husni Mubarak and by Jordanian King 'Abdallah Bin-Husayn.
The Palestinians believe that the change which has occurred in the Israeli leadership
with the fall of Binyamin Netanyahu and the rise of Labor leader Ehud Baraq calls for
coordination between the Arab states concerned, namely Syria, Jordan, Egypt, and
Palestine; a coordination that is in line with this change which, one way or another, will
lead to the resumption of the peace talks on all tracks.
The Syrians believe that it would be difficult to trust the Palestinians after they
bypassed the Arab coordination which began at the Madrid peace conference and after they
entered the settlement process on their own, and negotiated secretly in Oslo behind the
backs of the all the participating delegations, including the Palestinian delegation which
was led by well-known figure Dr. Haydar 'Abd-al-Shafi.
Palestinian-Syrian relations were never good over the past 20 years, and even before
the signing of the Oslo agreements. The tension dates back to the Lebanon phase when the
Palestinian resistance was mired in the swamp of the civil war and was involved in
alliances that Syria believed were directed against it or at least against its own notion
of Syrian-Lebanese relations.
Syrian President Hafiz al-Asad has not forgotten his Palestinian counterpart's
alliances with Iraq, and has accused him of supporting the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood
movement and some of its bombings in Damascus, while President 'Arafat has found it
difficult to swallow the humiliation of his expulsion from Damascus, and later the war in
the camps which he believes was carried out by the Amal movement with Syrian backing.
While these events belong to the past, what is new is a growing concern in Palestinian
official circles that the new Israeli prime minister might focus on the Syrian and
Lebanese tracks at the expense of the Palestinian track. Furthermore, the Palestinian
negotiators are alone on the threshold of the final phase talks which require more
coordination with Syria, Jordan and Egypt.
Baraq's remarks about his intention to withdraw from Lebanon within a year are
noteworthy. He no doubt realizes -- and so do the Palestinians with him -- that this
withdrawal cannot be achieved without signing a peace agreement with Syria which would
lead to a full withdrawal from the Golan.
It is probably worth pointing out that it was Baraq who led the Israeli negotiating
team in Maryland three years ago, during the negotiations with Syria, when he faced a
Syrian negotiating team led by former Syrian Army Chief of Staff General Hikmat al-Shihabi
who retired a year ago.
There were rumors that the two delegations had reached a semi-final agreement, and this
prompted the Syrian Government to demand its implementation by Netanyahu, by reiterating
the need for Netanyahu to implement the signed and non-signed agreements, in a clear
reference to this agreement.
The Palestinian official concern is what has currently prompted the coordination with
Syria..."

Yasser & Syria & Barak
London's AL SHARQ AL AWSAT 5/24/99: "People close to Palestinian President Yasir
'Arafat have said that he has been in a state of expectancy since Baraq was elected
Israel's prime minister on 17 May, and that he is very worried about the Israeli prime
minister-elect's statements about activating the Syrian track and the possibility that he
might reach an agreement on the Golan heights which would pave the way for an Israeli Army
withdrawal from southern Lebanon, at the expense of the Palestinian track.
Palestinian sources in Gaza which have asked to remain anonymous told Al-Sharq al-Awsat
that "as a result, 'Arafat has frantically been trying to visit Syria for a summit
meeting with Syrian President Hafiz al-Asad, in an attempt to remove these fears and
coordinate the next steps."
Palestinian sources in Damascus told Al-Sharq al-Awsat that "there are Arab,
Jordanian, Egyptian, and Palestinian mediations aimed at holding this meeting between
al-Asad and 'Arafat."
They added that "although there is a Syrian agreement in principle on this visit,
no date has been set. Also, no final agreement about it has been reached as yet. However,
it is not expected to take place before the new Israeli Government is formed."

Jordan's King Abdullah & Arafat
Voice of America 5/26/99: "Jordan's King Abdullah flew to Gaza wednesday for talks
with Palestinian authority president Yasser Arafat on middle east peace prospects,
following last week's Israeli elections...Mr. Arafat gave King Abdullah a red-carpet
reception at the newly-opened Gaza international airport as he arrived for his first-ever
visit to the Palestinian-controlled areas.
The talks came little more than a week after the Israeli election which saw hard-line
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu unseated by labor party leader Ehud Barak. The
implications of the change dominated the two rounds of meetings, at the airport and at Mr.
Arafat's Gaza City headquarters. The two leaders did not speak to reporters afterward. But
a joint statement said the two leaders agreed that the Palestinian track is the heart of
the middle east peace process -- including the right of the palestinians to establish
their own independent state.
The wording of the statement appeared to reflect concern that Mr. Barak -- after he
forms a government and takes office -- might first pursue a peace deal with Syria and
Lebanon in order to redeem his campaign pledge to have israeli troops out of Lebanon
within a year. Asher Susser -- an Israeli expert on Jordanian affairs at Tel Aviv
university -- says a "Syria-first" peacemaking scenario could limit Palestinian
leverage in subsequent bargaining with Israel.
And he told V-O-A that King Abdullah is also concerned over a possible backlash of
Palestinian violence in the West Bank, if there is no progress toward Israeli-Palestinian
peace in the coming months...[Susser;} '...the Jordanians have a nightmare scenario, which
I don't think is necessarily very realistic, but it is a scenario that they fear -- that
instability in the West Bank could spill over onto the East Bank (Jordan).'
The Palestinians and Jordan are supporting an Egyptian proposal for a five-way summit
that would also involve Syria and Lebanon, and would coordinate their approach to Israel
in the aftermath of the voting. Earlier this week in the United States, King Abdullah said
he liked and trusted Mr. Barak -- a former Israeli military chief of staff -- and urged
swift action to advance regional peace-making."

Lebanon awards Hezbollah
Beirut's RADIO LEBANON 5/21/99: "Deputizing for President Emile Lahhud, Republican
Guards Brigade Commander Colonel Mustafa Hamdan visited Hizballah General Secretariat
where he met with Hizballah Secretary General Hasan Nasrallah and the heroes of the Bayt
Yahun operation, in which the enemy post was stormed and an Israeli armored personnel
carrier was seized.
Colonel Hamdan presented to the leader of the operation a token gift, namely, a pistol
from the collection of the Republican Guards Brigade museum.
He conveyed the President's greetings and appreciation for the group's heroism and
sacrifice. Colonel Hamdan said the heroic operation left great moral impact and enthusiasm
to achieve victory. For his part, Nasrallah praised President Lahhud's initiative and his
patriotic positions against the occupation. He stressed that Lebanon, through its
resistance men, Army, and people, is now stronger and more determined to regain its
rights."

PA state in May 2000?
London's AL SHARQ AL AWSAT 5/23/99: "Authoritative Palestinian sources have
confirmed that the [Palestinian] state will be declared in May 2000, pointing out that
this is the wish of the US Administration, which wants to give the new Israeli Prime
Minister Ehud Baraq a chance.
The sources, who asked to remain anonymous, said that the US Administration will give
Baraq a full year to put the Israeli house in order and proceed with the peace process.
The sources pointed out to Al-Sharq al-Awsat that the Palestinian leadership is viewing
this matter with utmost caution; however, it has confidence in the US position, which
pledged to give a strong impetus to the Palestinian-Israeli track.
The sources pointed out that the US Administration is satisfied with the departure of
former Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who gave it a "headache," and
that it views Baraq with a different eye from the one with which it viewed Netanyahu. The
sources said that Baraq, who seems to be expressing hard-line views at the moment, will
display satisfactory flexibility after a while, namely after he forms a government and
reads the political map on the Israeli scene..."

Arab calls to protest over Ra's al Amud
IDF RADIO 5/25/99: "Faysal al-Husayni, the PLO official in charge of the Jerusalem
portfolio, knows that the High Court saved Orient House from being closed, but now he
would like to reopen a new channel of communication with the new Israeli Government.
Al-Husayni hopes for the resumption of the encounter track, dubbed the Jerusalem Forum,
that had been agreed on at the signing of the Oslo accords in Washington.
Al-Husayni then met with former Police Minister Moshe Shahal, and later with the
Likud's Mikha'el Eytan. Last night, al-Husayni asked to meet with One Israel's Yosi
Beilin. At the meeting, he described the Palestinian view of the present situation in
Jerusalem. For al-Husayni, construction at Har Homa and Ra's al-'Amud is out of the
question.
Leaflets distributed in East Jerusalem this week on behalf of all the Palestinian
factions called for escalation in protest over the Ra's al-'Amud construction. Realizing
the danger, al-Husayni decided t warn Knesset Member Beilin.
And while the latter was willing to listen, Beilin's authority is unclear. For his
part, Al-Husayni is looking for a partner to the Jerusalem Forum. In his opinion, the
situation in Jerusalem is still on the verge of an explosion."