|
Monday, August
27,
2001, Philippines
COL. Victor Corpus’ raising the possibility of the Philippines
turning into another Colombia elicited a variety of responses.
In Muslim Mindanao, it came as no surprise. People here have
come to terms with a not-so-distant prospect anymore but a creeping
reality of narco-politics in some of its towns and cities, perhaps
worse than it is in other parts of the country.
Accustomed
to the uncertainty of justice in these parts, they merely wish that
they or their children will not end up victims. Not because proof is
hard to find. But like Corpus’ case they might be inadmissible in
court.
Besides, nobody would relish the prospect of
detention in the Senate or, worse, as Filipino tabloids would put
it, "bathing in one’s own blood" for being talkative.
In
these parts, narco-politics and Islamist extremism are close
cousins.
Those who are in the business of ostentatiously
promoting "Islam" and "jihad" are also connected with politics and
narcotics. Like their counterparts in Afghanistan, Islamist rebel
groups engage in a diabolic mix of religious zeal and callous crime.
In such an environment, narco-political executions might even be
glorified as Islamic chastisement. This explains the cowardly
silence of a populace otherwise noted for courage.
Already
wary of the perils that face whistleblowers, the ordinary and often
unlearned Muslim is further threatened by the eternal damnation
reserved for those who squeal on their brothers. After all, the
self-proclaimed guardians of the faith would preach, these brothers
are only seeking to "sabotage the government of the Infidel and add
to the finances of the holy struggle." And, if they capture
government posts in the process, is it not a partial victory of the
jihad?
On any day in Marawi or Cotabato City, one has only
to mingle with the regular kibitzers in small coffeehouses or stores
to have an idea of the relationship between drugs, extremism, and
government, terrorism and rebellion. When asked who owns the best
and biggest AUVs passing by, the "istambays" would name
either a local government executive, a rebel commander, an
ustadz or a trader who is close to any of the above. (At
times, many or all these labels point to one and the same person.)
When pressed for more details, they would tell you these
expensive vehicles are "katas ng bato." In plain English,
by-products of the illegal drugs trade.
But, sadly, those
who know much don’t talk and those who talk don’t know much.
Perhaps, more than a Corpus is needed.
When Islamist
extremism is mentioned, especially by a Muslim, some fellow
adherents of Islam feel uneasy, if not outraged. These feelings are
further aggravated when the phrase is associated with crimes such as
the subjects of Corpus’ exposé.
Some non-Muslims also think
Islam as a faith is maligned. Which makes them either disturbed or
glad, depending on their degree of ecumenism. But it is neither the
intention nor the necessary effect of a reasoned critique of what is
a real phenomenon which is a product of the modern era.
Is
extremism a natural product of Islam? For lack of space, I will
treat that question in a future column or article in more detail.
But lest casual readers think that the religion preached by Abu
Sabaya and an 'ulama who professes membership in the MILF are
identical with the Islam of the Qur’an, the Prophet, and the early
teachers of the faith, let me quote some lines from Ibn al-`Arabi:
"My heart is open to all the winds: It is a pasture
for gazelles And a home for Christian monks, A temple for
idols, The Black Stone of the Mecca pilgrim, The table of
the Torah, And the book of the Qur’an. Mine is the religion
of love. Wherever God’s Caravans turn, The religion of love
Shall be my religion And my faith."
Muhyi-ud-din
ibn al-`Arabi was a Muslim mystic who lived in Spain between 1165 and
1240. He was praised by later Muslim scholars as the Great Master.
Christian scholars admired him no less. William Chittick,
paraphrasing Whitehead’s famous remark about Plato, wrote in an
article that subsequent to Ibn al-`Arabi, one could say that the history
of Islamic thought is but a footnote to his works. While the Qur’an
gives Divine prescription, Ibn al-`Arabi’s lines exhibit human
expression of Islamic tolerance of the highest order.
* * *
Comments to
[email protected]
©2001
www.inq7.net all rights reserved
|


|