Art. Dead. Fish. Three words not normally associated with each other. But James Ward, in a misguided effort to push back the boundaries of taste and artistic judgment still further, has done just that.



BUT IS IT ART?
Well?
Is it?
What do you think? I now put this question to the entire population of the online world.

Is this photo and the concept behind it:

a) A fragile, sublime and beautiful allusion to a fragile, sublime and beautiful Natural World, and the damage that Man has caused to it, ie global warming

b) A clumsy and amateurish rip off of the already substandard work of Damon Hurst. A pitiful attempt at using half baked sensationalism to attract attention, and an excuse to take dead fish onto the premises of the Royal Grammar School.

c) Art? I wouldn�t know about that, I just stack shelves, mate. Eastenders is good though.