Home
About
Links
Contact
Audi R8C LM-GTP
Page 1: R8R Development
Page 2: R8C Development
Page 3: R8C Development cont.
Page 4: Le Mans 1999
Page 5: Tech Details
Gallery

 

But then, in September 1998, came a surprise.......

During the development phase, Audi Sport boss Wolfgang Ullrich had constantly re- evaluated the everchanging pros and cons of the "roadster vs coupe" argument. As 1999 drew closer and the small print of the latest ACO regulations emerged, it became clear that both concepts would be equally capable of winning. The ACO had scrapped the GT1 class and replaced it with a new category called LM-GTP ("GT Prototype"). This would be for GT1-style cars but homologation would not be required. In an act that was not uncontroversial within the Audi group, Ullrich announced the decision to embrace both concepts and build a separate LM-GTP contender to run alongside the existing R8 LM-P car.

Henceforth, the LM-P car would be designated R8R (for "roadster") and the LM-GTP as R8C (for "Coupe").

But it would not simply be a case of attaching a roof to the R8R. To fully exploit the new LM-GTP regulations, the R8C would have to be an almost entirely different car sharing only the engine and rear suspension. With Le Mans pre-qualifying in May, this left an impossibly short space of time for design and construction. Fortunately for Audi it was able to hit the ground running. It had recently purchased RTN - the Norfolk, England based race car constructor. The RTN design team was not lacking in the required expertise and was led by Tony Southgate, the designer of the TWR/Jaguar Group 'C' cars and the previous year's Nissan GT1.

In terms of aerodynamics, the 1998 Toyota GT-One had set new standards in the GT class and the R8C was designed much along the same lines. To keep aerodynamic drag to a minimum, the frontal profile of the car incorporated a deep cleft between the wheel arches and cockpit casing. This gorge stretched along the length of the car, opening up towards the rear allowing air to flow through these valleys instead of being forced up and over the top as in the case of the R8R. This design meant the R8C was markedly different to its open-topped cousin. Unlike the Toyota, the R8C shape appeared to be a much less angular and more flowing design.

 

LEFT: The shadowy figure of the R8C on a secret test outing
CLICK HERE TO GO TO PAGE 3
www.greatracingcars.co.uk

1
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws