KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

ႸႠႥႪႤႢႭ

+

Modern Georgian Protest Songs

თავფურცელი
Home

Representations Chechen Republic Ichkeria in Finland and Norway

*V*Statistics about Georgia
*V*Georgian and Caucasian Anthropology
*V*BPG Series Georgian Fonts

- Site Map
- Search Site
- Ours Readers
- Feedback

 

Coat of Arms

LINKS:
Deda Ena ÃÄÃÀÄÌÀ
დედა ენა
DEDA ENA

First pure
Georgian Web site

Kaucasica ÉÀÅÉÀÑÈÉÀ
Caucasica

Reverse Links

Unicode encoded Georgian fonts are used
Download

Site Stats

Informational, Cultural and Economic 
Representation of 
Chechen Republic Ichkeria in 
Finland

Official Foreign Affairs Representative of the 
President of Chechen Republic Ichkeria in Finland, 
Appointed by President
Zelimkha Jandarbijev
Bessarion Gugushvili
Tel/Fax: +(358-9)-349-87-91 
E-mail: [email protected]

 

 

 

Poet, President, Peace Seeker ...

In 1997 General Aslan Maskhadov was elected 
President of Chechen Republic Ichkeria     >

INTERNATIONAL GROUP OF PARLIAMENTARIANS
ON THE PROBLEM OF CHECHENIA

Chechenia, Great Britain, Estonia, Hungary, India, Ireland, Japan, Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, New Zealand, Poland, Turkey, the Ukraine Gedimino pr. 53, Vilnius, Lithuania,
Tel./fax.: 370 2 39 64 97
Tel.: 370 2 22 01 07
E-MAIL: [email protected]

Documents:


International Committee on Human Rights of the Chechen Republic Ichkeria (ICHR-ChRI):
Aslanbek Abdurzakov, Chairman of the International Committee on Human Rights of the Chechen Republic Ichkeria

Web Site "Ichkeria-NGOs"
Aslanbek AbdurzakovRuslan Akaev (Vice-Chairman of the Coordinational Council of the Non-governmental Organizations of the Chechen Republic Ichkeria)


147 000 military, government officials and even clergy were awarded this medal:
"For the Conquest of Chechnya and Dagestan in 1857-1858 and 1859"
by Russian Emperor Alexander II


End of 1999,
Evil Empire started new aggression against Free Ichkeria
New atrocities, bloodshed, unscrupulous falsehood, new evidences of 'Russizm'...

ALERT!
Kremlin orders for total devastation of Johar-City (Grozny):
Danger of using chemical weapons !!!

See:

Watch objective information: http://www.kavkaz.org/

Humanitarian dimension: http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/russia/chechnya/
See Also: Amina site

Statement of Representative of the
President of Chechen Republic Ichkeria in Finland on
"New aggression of Kremlin in Ichkeria"

Win cyr document

Protest movement in Finland:

  • 22 Oct. 1999 - Picket - top level meeting between EU leaders and Russian Prime Minister Putin in Helsinki

  • 12 Nov. 1999 - Picket - Meeting of foreign ministers OSCE and Russia in Helsinki

  • From 25 Nov. 1999 - daily collection of signatures with demand to recognize Chechnya as independent state


Paintings of Alla Dudajeva - widow of Jokhar Dudajev


Finnish-Caucasian Association
Chairman Heikki Riihijarvi
Vice-Chairman Aila Niinimaa-Keppo
Fax: +(358-9) 694 02 88
Tel: +(358-9) 694 02 99
E-mail: [email protected]


Ambassador at large of Chechen Republic Ichkeria to the EEC
Prince Charles Tchkotoua
Tel:: +(44-171)-352-3597
Fax: +(44-171)-352-8968


Representative of Chechnya to Denmark
Usman Firzauli
Tel/Fax: +(45) 33 24 91 54


Informational Reports from Finland

Report on Chechenia I: Internetional Law
Report on Chechenia II: Long, Difficult and Turbulent History of Chechenia
Report on Chechenia III: Human Rights and Attempted Genocide in Chechenia


Report on Chechenia I: Internetional Law
By: Klaus Susiluoto 31.10.1999,

The international community bears a large responsibility for the situation in the Chechen Republic, Ichkeria. This report tells why Chechenia fulfills many requirements for recognition (of independence) to become a member in the international community whereas Russia has broken against international law as well as mutual agreements. It also seems that Russia has no respect for human rights.

Chechenia declared independence already in 1991

Despite Russia’s misinformation campaign the fact is that there are many facts which speak in favor of Chechen independence. First, Chechenia declared its independence already in the autumn 1991, just before the Soviet Union officially collapsed and became Russia. According to Soviet constitution, the republics and autonomous republics actually had a right for secession. Officially Chechenia declared its independence 1.st of November, 1991.

Secondly, Chechenia arranged free presidential elections the same autumn when Jokhar Dudayev was elected as a president. About 90 % of the population voted for him, mainly because of his strive towards independence. So, the will of the Chechen nation was clearly in favor of independence.

At the beginning of 1997 Aslan Maskhadov was became President in fair and free elections. He naturally also is pro-independence figure - he was actually the commander-in-chief during the Russian invasion 1994-96.In the elections of 1997 he got 59.3 % of the votes. The election process was done in the presence of OSCE and other foreign observers. So, Russia’s aim at creating puppet government and marionette leader to replace Mr. Maskhadov is a clear violation against the principles of democracy.

Thirdly, Chechenia (Chechnya is a Russified form of the name of this territory of some 17.000 km2 did not participate in the talks between the center and 89 Russian areas in 1991-1992 when Russian Federation was formed, nor has it later agreed to the Federation treaty.

Legal right for self-determination

The fourth reason for the right to be independent is linked to the brutal invasion of Russia in 1994-96. The violations of human rights, which led to genocide of tens of thousands civilians, was a clear signal that Russia does not fulfil the moral or legal requirements set for good and human administration in the Chechen area. Mr. Charles Tchkotoua says in his article ”Past Explains the Future”:

”In the recent years it has become a principle of the international law that a people deprived of its right to self-determination, particularly where this situation is accompanied serious human-rights violations, is legally entitled to self-determination.”

This was partly the case in East-Timor where 800 000 local people were brutally ruled by a nation of 200 million inhabitants.

The fifth reason for the right of independence is linked to the treaty that ended the war in Chechenia in 1996. It is stated in the “Khasavjurt Agreement”, signed between General Alexander Lebed, official representative of Russian Federation, and Aslan Maskhadov, Chechenia’s representative:

“The basis for mutual relations between the Russian Federation and the Chechen Republic, in accordance with universal principles of international law, shall be reached before October 31.st, 2001.” (And there are no references to the Federal Treaty in this agreement).

Chechenia is not an Ultra-Islamist state

What Russia is now doing is very far from the principles of international law. By allowing Russia to continue the brutal politics the West is giving a signal to Russia not to respect international law or the basic human rights.

According to the statutes of the UN and OSCE, every nation has a right for self-determination. Why has this principle been forgotten in the Chechen case? One reason may be Russian misinformation. Chechen Republic of Ichkeria is not an ultra-Islamist state. The rights of non-Muslim religious practices are guaranteed in the Constitution. Nor is there any evidence of that the terrorist acts in Moscow would have been made by Chechens. However, the Chechens have sponsored the Dagestan independence movement, but the fact is that both Chechenia and Dagestan are areas annexed to Russia by force in the 19.th century. If the colonies in Africa and Asia have had their independence from the West, why not the ones in Northern Caucasus?

Although the Chechens at the moment are not terrorists, not even fanatics, there is a danger that they will be seeking more radical Islam because of West’s calm attitude.

If there is a nation that deserves independence, it is the Chechens. The negotiations between Russia and Chechenia should start as soon as possible to avoid even more casualties. In the long run, also Russia would benefit from a small friendly neighbor.

Main source used in this report: Contrasts and solutions in the Caucasus edited by Ole Hoiris and Sefa Martin Yürükel, Aarhus University Press, Denmark 1998. ISBN 87-7288-708-7. Especially articles by:

  • Charles Tchkotoua

  • Daniel Haradstveit

  • Marie Benningsen Broxup

  • Märta-Lisa Magnusson (she also stressed the importance of “informal” talks where Russia de facto gave a certain status to Chechen delegations and independence)

This book is one of the few books dealing with Caucasus. The book contains some objective and good articles such as those mentioned above, but all articles are not as qualified. There simply are not enough experts on the Caucasian issues.


Report on Chechenia II: Long, difficult and turbulent history of Chechenia
By: Antero Leitzinger & Klaus Susiluoto (1999 11 20).

World has been surprised because of the tough resistance of Chechens against Russians. There is, however, historical background to this. The conflict between official Russia and the Chechens has lasted more than 250 years, mainly because of Russia’s brutal policy in this distant corner of Europe and Chechens´ unwillingness to subdue to Russian command.

Cossacks were not a real threat

The history of Chechenia is long, difficult and turbulent. (”Chechnya” is Russified form of the name of this territory. The Chechens actually call their country “Ichkeria” nowadays but we use Chechenia here). The tribes that later formed the Chechen nation have been mentioned in the Armenian and Georgian documents already from the 7th century on. Armenians and Georgians had adapted Christianity at an early stage, it was a state religion in Georgia from 4th century on. There are also Church remnants on Chechen territory, so part of the population may have been Christian. Later Islam became more important, however, but paganism prevailed in many areas until the 18th century – when Islam started to act as ideology of independence and self-determination.

There were many Chechen tribes, but common to them was love for freedom and emphasis on equality (many sources refer to this). The form of government was free men’s democratic society similar to that of the Swiss, also a mountain people. They were skilled warriors who sometimes used their energy in robberies, taking also hostages under certain regulations. There was not land-tied serfdom in the Chechen lands. They did not have nobility, which made it difficult for Russia to give grants and to create a local pro-Russian upper class.

Chechens had cattle, and they cultured soil as well, but most of the land was forest until the 19.th century, when Russians destroyed big part of the woods in connection with their war efforts – this was ecological catastrophe and essentially changed landscape and agriculture of the region. Chechens were not “plain people” or plainsmen as Russians (liking their Steppes); Chechens had their great forests, beautiful hills and desolate mountains. For example Chechen tribe of Ichkers lived as free men in the forest of Ichkeria - which later gave the name to the contemporary state. There were even regulations to protect old trees.

“Chechnya” - how the area became called by Russians – was relatively compact and peaceful. Some tribes adopted Islam earlier than others, while some tribes emphasized their traditional way of life. The common Vainakh - as they call themselves - nation was very democratic, and each tribe and family could decide very much for them selves. This was how the Russian invaders were able to separate the more hierarchically organized people in Daghestan (where Khanates existed) and the peaceful Ingush tribe from the more independent-minded Chechens.

The real clashes with Russians did not start until the 18.th century, although Cossacks had lived in the Northern part of the Terek river since 16th century (Ryazan Cossacks possibly already in the 15.th century). Cossacks adapted some Caucasian habits, but they remained Christians, whereas many mountaineers converted into Islam at the same time. There were not, however, religious wars. (Cossacks were originally rebels who escaped central government of Moscow and serfdom). Later the role of Cossacks in Russian Empire was to gain new lands, they were not tribe or ethnicity but paramilitary unions). Fights between Cossacks and Chechens were mainly for cattle and land but Chechen tribes had campaigns (at least 1604, 1685, 1712) to drive the Cossacks to the North of Terek river. On the other hand, there were interethnic marriages and peaceful coexistence most of the time.

Imperialist policy starts

The first real conflict between the Russians and Chechen tribes began during the reign of Peter the Great who at the same time declared himself as heir and crown-prince of Georgian Kingdom (although Georgia before this was independent, having much older statehood and culture than Russia). Russia’s imperialistic policy in Caucasus had thus started. The (official) Russian troops encountered the Chechens for the first time in the summer 1722 while attempting to conquer the village of Ender. The Chechens won the battle, and Peter the Great persuaded the Kalmuks to a campaign of revenge against them.

During the following decades the Russians were not very successful, but they started using Cossacks in Russian politics in Caucasus . These former rebels became under Russian state special protection (they now raised rebellions against state only when their privileges were attacked) Cossacks were used as a Russian armed hand in campaigns in Caucasus.

In the 1760’s Kizljar became the Russian capital of Caucasus. The Chechen Kist tribe attacked the city in the late 1760’s killing its inhabitants. During 1765-1779 the Kabardos fought against the Russians, having assistance from the Chechen tribes. One feature of Northern Caucasus was – and still is, in spite of Russification – a rich texture of small nations and languages. Contrary to a common belief, they share a lot of everyday habits, and religious wars have not been very usual.

Grozny founded in 1818

During the reign of Catherine the Great Russia’s imperial policy strengthened. Catherine’s favorite Count Potemkin established Vladikavkaz in the beginning of 1780’s. It was abandoned but re-established in 1799 (Vladikavkaz means “ruling Caucasus”, so openly imperialist were the Russians of that time!).

Important factor for Chechenia and all North Caucasus was establishing of rule of Russia in Georgia (started from early 18th and ended in the middle of the century, again since the beginning of 19.th century, partially voluntarily this time). Also Armenia and today’s Azeri areas were taken by Russia, so North Caucasus (Daghestan, Chechenia) was rounded by Russian colonies. Also important was official state politics of Tsarist Russia. Russian colonization of Caucasus meant also ethnical cleansing and as well as demographic colonization, so there were big changes of ethnic structure in these territories. – This was officially -not secretly – declared.

The Georgian Military Road was constructed to Tbilisi, Georgia. Although Catherine II (Catherine the Great) and her follower (after a short interval) Alexander I were relatively enlightened rulers in Russian scale, they did not understand the flexible diplomacy that would have needed in this region.
The Russian General Yermolov was nominated commander of the Caucasus region in 1816. It was Yermolov who founded Grozny in the middle of Chechen lands in summer 1818. He was a skillful soldier but very unskillful diplomat. An English observer, historian John F. Baddeley later remarked:

“Yermolov’s strategy was based on the complete terrorizing of the civilian population, which provoked horror and outcry for its cruelty even in Moscow. He promised results within a year, yet he only managed to provoke previously independent other nationalities of the Caucasus into a united holy war against Russia”

No wonder that a common Chechen-Daghestani resistance to Russian colonial rule lasted more than 40 years after the founding of Grozny! It was the surrender of the legendary leader Shamil in 1859, when Russia had “peace” in Caucasus – for a while. Around mid-19th century, the perseverance of Shamil's "mountaineers" was followed and analyzed with amazement all over Western Europe, where the Caucasian war was compared to the early freedom fights of Algeria and South Africa. The morality of European colonial wars became questioned (by Karl Marx and many others), and romantic literature flourished with descriptions of both Chechen chivalry and banditry, with frequent but inaccurate references to kidnappings (f. ex. by Alexandre Dumas and Lev Tolstoy). Despite Romanticism, Shamil and his precedessor Sheik Mansur and Gazimullah were not only soldiers but also skillful administrators who had keen interest in foreign policy also. In many cases they had to disappoint with Turkey’s policy.

Caucasus has often influenced and sometimes even dominated Russian foreign policy. It has been claimed that the rigidly autocratic rule of Czar Nicholas I was exhausted and the collapse in the Crimean War (1853-56) hastened by the continuous humiliations of Russian military in Chechenia. Tens of thousands of Russians died in wars in Caucasus during 19th century.

An early Russian dissident, Ivan Golovin, wrote from his French exile in 1845:

"The war in the Caucasus is under prevalent circumstances a truly fruitless war and the stubbornness, with which the Russian government insists on its continuation, will have nothing but useless bloodshed and increased hate as its consequence, and make every lasting rapproachement impossible. Russia should, first of all, declare war on its own officials who are its greatest enemies, and who, after calling forth the quarrel themselves, make it in its continuance pernicious, by robbing and stealing without mercy. They sacrifice the interest of the country to their own interests and sell enemies even weapons and gunpowder. They conceal the number of the killed ones..."

Not much has changed in over 150 years!

Republic of  Mountaineers’ People

Despite the official conquest of Chechenia in 1859, war in Caucasus never really ended. Hundreds of thousands of Cherkesses were forced to move to Turkey during 1860’s. Circassians were subdued by 1864, but Chechens rose again in frequent popular revolts in 1862-1865 and 1877-1878. The same policy was used in South Caucasus, where most of Abkhazian-Adigean tribes were totally eliminated (Ubikhs) or forced to migrate to Ottoman Empire (Turkey). Thousands of Chechens were deported, and voluntary mass emigrations took place in 1901. There are tens of thousands of people in Jordan and Turkey who have Chechen roots. Descendents from this diaspora have helped Ichkerian Chechens – Russians naturally refer them as international Arab terrorists!

During the First World War and revolution in Russia in 1917, a “Confederation of North Caucasian Peoples”, or a "Republic of Mountaineers" (as it was popularly called) was established. Independence was declared on 11 May 1918, which was de facto recognized by Turkey, Germany and France. The flag contained green and white stripes, which can still be seen in the modern Ichkerian flag (the Republic of Mountaineers, however, included also other nationalities as well such as Kumyks and Avars).

The Government had to exile to Georgia and further to France (together with Georgian government) by advancing Russian troops - both White and Red (Bolshevik) - by 1921. Armed resistance was nevertheless recorded until 1925 and again in 1929-1936 and 1940-1951.

During the Finnish Winter War (1939-40) Hasan Israilov, journalist by profession, raised a rebellion in Chechenia. The temporary government remained in power for several weeks in 1940.

Many Chechen leaders were executed or deported in 1929 and 1939, and finally in February 1944 almost the whole population (about 400 000 according to 1939 census) was deported to Central Asia, mainly to Kazakhstan. The reason was: pro-Nazi attitudes – although Nazis never arrived on the Chechen soil! (Only part of Ingushetia was occupied by the Germans). Soviets also destroyed Chechen national monuments such as ancient watchtowers and tombstones. Many villages were burnt, thousands of people were shot or left die.

For a while, there was neither Chechenia nor Ingushetia anymore. Although the Soviet Union was officially voluntary federation of numerous more or less nominally autonomous entities, "Socialist Soviet Republics" (SSR's and ASSR's), the existence and status of these pseudo-states was determined by political convenience and the whims of a dictator. Tuva, for example, had been a fully independent state for some decades - just like (Outer) Mongolia, although both were recognized only by the Soviet Union and each other - until 1944, when it was suddenly downgraded into an ASSR within Russia. Chechens could not return to their native land before mid 50´s. Some were not granted a permission before 70’s and 80’s (there was an internal passport in Russia).

Many Russians had moved to houses owned by Chechens, and there was unrest in 1958 between Russians and Chechens, but all in all, the two nationalities lived quite peacefully together. Oil industry became leading branch of industry for Checheno-Ingushetia with Grozny as its center. (Grozny had been important center of oil industry already 1917, second after Baku in Azerbaijan, but it was after WW I and civil war of Russia, when the population growth of Grozny really began).

Checheno-Ingushetia

In 1956-1957, the status of Checheno-Ingushetia was re-established as an ASSR (autonomous republic) within Russia and the Soviet Union. This is the base of contemporary Russia's claim that Chechenia is an integral part of the Russian Federation. While the international community today refuses to recognize the legality of protectorates and annexations of Germany and Japan in the 1930s and 1940s, and most countries never officially accepted the annexation of the Baltic states by the Soviet Union in 1940, Stalin's legacy has been sanctioned by accepting the Bolshevik administrative structures and their arbitrary changes between 1918 and 1957. The people in the Soviet Union were never consulted or given a chance to exercise the same democratic rights of national self-determination as granted to the colonies of other European empires. Even a big part of the Russians living in Chechenia are in favor of independence.

Ichkeria declares independence in 1991

In autumn 1991,Checheno-Ingushetia was divided into Chechenia which declared independence as the "Chechen Republic of Ichkeria" (1.11.1991), and to Ingushetia, which choose to remain within the Russian Federation. Several experts of international law have considered these changes of legal status equally legal. When the Soviet Union disintegrated in December 1991, all SSR's were recognized as independent states but the Russian Federation, as a kind of rump-USSR, did not grant its own autonomous republics the same rights, although this should have logically followed.

There was a referendum about the constitution of the Russian Federation in 1993, but Chechenia and Tatarstan did not participate in it. The Russian Federation then negotiated a separate treaty with Tatarstan in 1994, but invaded Chechenia in December 1994. (There had been clashes before this). The Chechen war of 1994-96 was very bloody. The peace came in August 1996 with Lebed as Russia’s main negotiator.

As we have seen, Russia did not respect peace agreement, but used obscure terrorist accusations as a pretext to launch a new attack (we will deal KGB’s or FSB’s possible role in this in our report V). Although there would have been some dozen Chechen terrorists and although there are criminals doing kidnappings, this does not allow an attempted genocide and full-scale war (see our report III), as was also stated by German Councellor Gerhard Schröder in OSCE’s meeting in Istanbul.

What makes Russian politics so psychotic in Caucasus?

One reason for unskillful politics of Russians in Caucasus is their total lack of self-criticism combined with unwillingness to compromise. This could be called a general reason. Then there is of course the will to revenge the humiliations in the first Chechen war. Another aspect is Russia’s internal politics. Prime Minister Putin is trying to raise his popularity by means of war. One reason for continued conflict is that Russians are not willing to negotiate with democratically elected forces in Chechenia – which means they basically do not even respect democracy. One factor in Russian policy is oil ( a Dutch expert will tell about this in our later reports) – important oil pipelines go through Chechenia.

It has been typical in Russian history to negotiate only with those who are going to agree! - as Prime Minister Vladimir Putin stated boldly in Helsinki in October 1999. Russia admits, that there can be only a peaceful political solution to the problem of Chechenia, but only after all opposition has been wiped out by force!

It should be remembered, that even international observers like the OSCE have evidence of two kind:

  1. that the puppet rulers established by Russia in shamelessly rigged show "elections" in 1995-1996 did not enjoy genuine popular support;

  2. that the chief of staff of the Ichkerian army, Aslan Maskhadov, was elected as president of Ichkeria in fair and free elections in 1997. Nevertheless, Russian officials have again denied the legitimacy of Maskhadov, with whom Yeltsin signed a treaty in May 1997, (and established shadow representations, puppet government by notorious criminals like Beslan Gantemirov). The reason to deny Maskhadov’s legitamacy is simple: he is not going to give up the idea of Chechen independence - what was basement of his election campaign.

How to study history of Caucasus?

In studying the history of the Chechen nation, Moshe Gammer's work "Muslim Resistance to the Tsar - Shamil and the Conquest of Chechnya and Daghestan" (London 1994) is the most valuable source published recently. Details over the resistance from mid-19th to mid-20th century can only be composed from short fragments here and there.

Anatol Lieven’s book “Chechnya: The Tombstone of Russian Power” reveals the inner weakness of Russian army during the campaign of 1994-96. Lieven also has interesting remarks about Chechen national character, which is very egalitarian (in contrast to Russians). Lieven also says, that “even religious Chechens are often a great deal less strictly Islamic than they think they are”. He says that Chechen mosques are different from all other mosques he had seen, resembling English neo-Gothic redbrick castles and churhes! And when one knows that Chechens have good relations with the Baltic countries, the only genuinely democratic countries of ex-Soviet Union, it is not very easy to believe Russian stories about Ultra-Islamist terrorists. (Although there is a danger that this will later happen, if Russia pursues its brutal policy, as Mr. Clinton said in Istanbul).

Equally important is to study the history of other Caucasian nations and their obvious common denominator, Russia. There is, for example, an intriguing similarity in what happened in Karabakh and Abkhazia, and generally in Azerbaijan and Georgia in 1988-1993 (the return of the old Soviet time politicians). Chechenia was about to follow the same scenario, but the separation of Ingushetia and the timely military build-up of Jokhar Dudayev - who was an army officer, in contrast to his colleagues Zviad Gamsakhurdia and Abulfaz Elchibey - saved Chechenia for a different fate (in Georgia, form example, there was a coup provoked with demonstrations, which in Georgia had never more than 2000 persons).

Western TV showed some “anti-Zviadist and anti-Dudayev demonstrations” which were actually PRO-Zviadist and PRO-Dudayev demonstrations! – This can be read on Georgian banners in the hands of demonstrators (Orthodox Georgians and Muslim Chechens have traditionally had quite good relations, although Abhazia has caused headache in relations because of Chechen involvement there).

Georgian coup of 1991-92, when Gamsahurdia was ousted, was assisted by Russian military forces combined with local elite which included some criminal elements as well (later president Shevardnadze has taken some distance towards Russians, approaching the US). In Chechenia Russian Army bases were closed in early 1991 – this was one factor Chechens could do better than Georgia or Azerbaijan until late 1994. Another factor for the collapse of real democracy in Georgia and Azerbaijan was strong antizviadist and antielchibay propaganda from the Western states – who labeled them as dictators, ultranationalists etc.

Caspian Sea oil is important factor in Caucasian politics. Last accord in this deal was signed OSCE’s meeting in Istanbul 18.11.1999 when Baku-Jeikhan Pipeline through Georgia became one of the main goal of Istanbul summit. Although Chechenia was on schedule, it seems that West still does not fully understand the range of Russia’s brutal politics in Caucasus. This is not a good trend, since human rights and democracy in Caucasus is just as important as in the West.

There was, however, some progress in the Chechen issue also in OSCE’s Istanbul meeting (see our other report). Important was for example that Mr. Maskhadov was understood to be democratically elected President of Chechenya (Finland’s President Mr. Ahtisaari, who used EU’s speech, took a strong position in Istanbul in favor of Mr. Maskhadov, urging Russia to negotiate with him).

More details about Chechen history can be found in the book "CAUCASUS and an unholy alliance", published in Vantaa, Finland, in autumn1996, which is based on an originally  Finnish booklet "Tshetsheenit", published in Helsinki, Finland, in January 1995, and contains many articles by renowned writers about Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and the "ethnic conflicts" of Central Asia as well. Both books can be ordered from Leitzinger Books, Kytösuontie 8 D 47, 00300 Helsinki, Finland; please look for further information on http://www.clinet.fi/~zinger/booksAnatol Lieven’s book on Chechenya can be ordered via Amazon.com


Report on Chechenia III: Human Rights and Attempted Genocide in Chechenia.
By Antero Leitzinger (1999-11-17) and Klaus Susiluoto.
The sources are mentioned in the text.
See also: www.chechenya.org and www.amina.com and Yahoo.com/News.

Within several weeks the world is celebrating the millennium. It would be an important symbolic gesture for international community to start the 3.rd millennium from a ”clean table” in Europe. This does not seem to be possible, when Russia is violating the basic human rights in Chechenia in an extremely brutal way. There are clear evidences of war crimes. As a whole, the Chechen catastrophe can be called a serious attempt at genocide.

Utterly lawless war

The wars in Chechenia have been among the bloodiest in European history, especially when taking into account the small area (17.000 km2) and the population of no more than about one million (1989) – the figure now is even less. The first Chechen war of 1994-96 killed almost 100.000 people. Of these, an estimated 60.000-70.000 were civilians, 13.000-15.000 Russian soldiers and 8.000-10.000 Chechen fighters.

Ms. Holly Cartner, executive director of Human Rights Watch’s Europe and Asia division, called the Chechen conflict of 1994-96 ”an utterly lawless war”. Just a few days after the new Russian invasion this autumn, Ms. Cartner warned about a new catastrophe, which has now reached terrible scales. Already 4.000 civilians have been killed so far in brutal shellings, missile attacks and bombings. Compared to the size of population this would mean that more than 200.000 French, 300.000 Germans or more than 500.000 Russians would have been massacred! In this light everybody understands that this is not only a humanitarian catastrophe, but a very serious attempt at a genocide.

Human Right Watch has collected information of the civilian casualties by interviewing eyewitnesses in refugee camps in Ingushetia. (The interviews were done separately and at length). The human rights teams found out that:

  1. On October 21.st at 5 PM three missiles hit Grozny (Jokharchala in Chechen language) central bazaar, killing about 140 people. Of these, only a few were Chechen soldiers. The attack was, in all likelihood, a war crime by Russians. Even if the Chechens had their command center in the vicinity of the bazaar, which would be against international rules, the attack was a serious crime. (Chechens did not have a command center near to the square - this information by Mr. Gugushvili, official representative of Ichkeria).

  2. The village of Novyi Sharoi, which had only civilian people, suffered heavily under Russian bombardments starting on October 23.rd. Proven death casualties at least ten. (for further information, Jean-Paul Marthoz in Brussels, + 3 22 736 78 38, Diederik Lohman in Moscow, + 7 095 250 68 52)

  3. The village of Samashki, without Chechen combatants, suffered dozens of dead and wounded in one day, Oct 27th (further inf. Rachel Denber, + 1 212 216 12 66)

  4. The city of Urus Martan has been bombed every day in November, except November 9-11, when it was extremely cold. Many casualties are reported.

These examples are naturally only a part of Russia’s brutal policy. The attack on Grozny’s central bazaar coincided at the same time when Russia’s Prime Minister Vladimir Putin visited Helsinki to attend the top meeting between Russia and the EU. Mr. Putin stated in Helsinki that the explosions would have been between Chechen gangs, which was a pure lie. - According to Washington Post, Pentagon has tracked more than 60 short-range ballistic missile attacks to Chechenia (two of those in the Central Bazaar). The Russian missile strikes are very inaccurate, destroying whole block, even many blocks of cities, which means that those attacks can be seen as terrorist measures hurting and killing innocent civilians (this opinion drawn from Israeli and US defense official’s reports, which certainly are not in favor of Chechens).

Executions and hunger deaths

The German human rights organization Gesellschaft für bedrohte Völker published a press release on 2.nd of November. According to the report the Russian troops have executed Chechen (war) prisoners as well as civilians. In Naurski and Gorogorski counties 80 men have been shot. (One should also bear in mind that in last Chechen War the Russians gathered Chechen males of age more than 14 years to infiltration camps. The torture in these camps was systematic. American scientist Amy Knight, in her book Spies Without Cloaks, estimated that almost 800 security agency officials began to handle affairs in the occupied areas in 1994-96).

In the war of 1994-96 as well as now in 1999 the Russian soldiers have robbed Chechen property, even blackmailed family things to themselves in order to let people cross the border to Ingushetia. There are also information about first hunger deaths in Chechenia (Felicitas Rohder, phone + 49 551/4990628).

Jelena Bonner, widow of famous scientist and human rights activist Andrei Saharov, said in front of the foreign committee of US Senate on 4th of November:
”This war is needed to raise the standing in the polls of the current prime minister, Vladimir Putin, whom Yeltsin has publicly endorsed as his chosen successor…Chechens have been banished from Russian cities, with Moscow leading the way in violating their legally protected rights…” There have been illegal arrests and deportations of Chechens living Russian cities, so the tragedy does not happen only in Chechenia proper. Who can guarantee Chechens living in Russia will not be deported even in larger scale?

The Russian leadership also violates the civil rights (of Russians) and international war regulations by using young army draftees in the battles in Chechenia (President Yeltsin’s decree, whereas only volunteers should be used).

Concrete measures are needed

It seems that Russia’s tactics is to weaken Chechen population by partial or total mass murder in order to subdue the runaway republic. But as our history report shows, this is not an easy task. One should, however, be really concerned about Russia’s policy. When they have not had the victory by “normal” way of fighting, they are, in a state of war psychosis, more and more willing to use even more destructive weapons. This does not mean one should let Russia blackmail world community. If there will no concrete measures against Russia, also Georgia and Azerbaijan may suffer (see www.jamestown.org). There have also been threats against these countries, and on 17.11. Russian helicopters laid mines on Georgian territory (CNN, Interfax), a measure that Georgia immediately protested.

Jelena Bonner and Bessarion Gugushvili have warned that Russia’s aim is not to destroy terrorists (where are the proofs of Moscow explosions?) but to annihilate the whole Chechen people or crucially weaken them by blind aggression).

An American veteran on foreign policy, Mr. Zbigniew Brzezinski recently warned about the possibility of genocide.

If Russia lives Stalinist times demonizing, destroying and killing people, when the rest of Europe (perhaps except Serbia) has, after all, learned something, is it not a dangerous situation? Russia will not learn anything if it is allowed to continue its brutal policy. The first step to a peaceful solution is that Russia will withdraw its troops from the Republic as Mr. Knut Vollebaek, Norwegian foreign minister, chairman of OSCE, has demanded Russia to do as soon as possible.

There was indeed some progress in OSCE meeting in Istanbul just a few days ago, but history shows that Russia is not willing to keep its promises and respect international agreements, especially not in Caucasus. Our next report (IV) will handle this problem field, and tell why it is important to for the West as well as Russia that there will be sanctions against Russia.

Only concrete measures can save the Chechen nation from genocide.


Chechnya official Home
Chechnya official Home


Letters from readers
CHECHYA / NOKHCHIN
David Russo

Their land was born on a storming night;
The mother wolf gave a howl of fright.
The Chechens were raised in the mountains cold,
This noble folk learned of the days of old.
“Allahu akbar!” was the great cry,
Their love of God none could deny.
Chechen mothers, strong and proud
Raised children to sing out firm and loud.
Their fathers taught them to hunt in the wood;
To live in nature and to all to do good.

“Nokhchin!” they cry, their sacred motherland.
“Nokhchin!” they cry, they are no thieves’ band;
Though some might say that of them --
These are the noble race of Shem!
Hard days have they endured,
Wrath upon them was poured,
The years went by, great with pain,
Not washed away in mountain rain,
But in a foreign land they were,
Not in their home of wood and fur.
The nation was cruel to all the clans:
The once had Soviets stolen their lands.
Yet still they sang “Allahu akbar!”, to the Lord,
Though many days they had fought and warred.

Now again their freedom was threatened,
By the blood of the innocent was the flag wettened.
Chechens are free as the eagles of the mountain,
To prove it they drank bitter draughts from life’s fountain!
Rocks may fall and crack and break,
Yet Chechen honor will no one take!
They overcame hardship and strife,
With dignity, to live a free life.
Though the enemy wounded them cruelly,
And swords pierced people unduly;
Soldiers died by bullets in the wild and cold,
Civilians murdered: more evil than of old!
Finally, the terrible waste was stopped,
The branch of peace on them was dropped.

And although their tears have flowed,
They’ve finished the trial of a heavy load.
The love of friends,
And Their song bends,
To Help them recover from their trouble.
The waters of hope do bubble,
And a bright future they await.
Slow, sweetly, softly: not too late.
They have peace, and they are free!
A great republic they aspire to be.
They’re people of the wolf, of the great homeland,
And Almighty, Eternal God holds their hand!
“We are proud to be Chechen!” they do cry,
And to the heavens they hold their heads high.


"They (Chechnya) consider themselves free, in practice we are dealing with a free state which resolves its problems outside the constitution of the Russian Federation, and yet we try to put a handkerchief over that obvious point." -- Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov, saying the Russian government should recognize the breakaway region as independent.
"Russia Today" 1.16.1996


April 21 - International Day of Chechnya

Supporters of Chechnya in Finland noted International Day of Chechnya and memorial of Djohar Dudayev


On this picture:
Russian Army ammunition boxes full of bones of chechens killed in Karpinski "filtration camp" near Grozny. Bodies were processed thermally and chemically, bones were crushed. From the book "Chechnya - Fight for Independence", by Zelimkha Yandarbiyev.


To His Excellency
President of the Chechen Republic - Ichkeria (Chechnya)
General Aslan Mashadov

Dzhokhar-Ghal (Grozny)

Your Excellency

With great admiration of and respect for the valorous fight for independence of the Ichkerian nation, and with deep sympathy and concern because of the Russian atrocities in and devastation of your country the undersigned Finnish non-governmental organizations have the honour and pleasure to congratulate the Ichkerian people and Your Excellency in person for your great achievements so far.

We and with us the vast majority of our people do ardently hope that your courage, strength and perseverance – the sisu, as we call that mentality with a word which became world-famous durlng our Winter War against the Soviets in 1939-40 – as well as the democratic dignity shown by your people in recent elections and the wisdom of your eadership will bring about the final triumph of a safe freedom and independence to Ichkeria.

Having suffered under Czarist oppression and having succesfully frustrated Soviet Russian imperialist schemes against Finland in three wars (l918, 1939-40, l941-44) we Finns know of our own experience what standing alone against overwhelming odds entails – but we also know that success is possible in such an endeavour.

Sadly, we also know that the words and deeds of faraway Western governments are often worlds apart. The world should not leave you alone. The Russians never can and never will repay the material destruction they have inflicted on Ichkeria. Therefore the world should extend diplomatic recognition and sufficient material assistance to Ichkeria.

The undersigned do appeal to the Government of Finland asking it to fulfill what we consider its moral responsibility towards another small nation, conquered by the late Czars which has bravely and with great sacrifices shown its determination to be free from imperialist domination.

We ask our Government to do its utmost in the framework of the European Union for the recognition of the independence of Ichkeria, as well as in our national confines to direct material assistance to Ichkeria as well as to assure the safe delivery to Ichkeria of aid shipments of private organizations in Finland.

We do bare our heads paying our reverential respect to the fallen freedom fighters of Ichkeria and to the civilian victims of Russian atrocities. We are especially remembering the Father of the proclamation of the independence of Ichkeria, late President, His Excellency Dzhokhar Dudaev, teacherously ambushed by Russians during a teleconversation with a negotiator. May we also in this connection mention the fate of the late President of Georgia, His Excellency Zviad Gamsakhurdia, a great champion of freedom, democracy and human rights, an idealist and a poet, who enjoyed the friendship and the protection of your people during his exile, before he was hunted down in the Caucasian mountains by the restorers of terror rule in Georgia.

May God – and your own wisdom, hardened by experience – protect you personally and your people from further treacherous acts by the opponents of freedom.

Mr President, we ask you to accept the assurances of our deepest respect.

Helsinki, February 5, 1997

Suomen Helsinki-Ryhmä RY
(The Helsinki Group of Finland)
Heimo Rantala, Chairman
Sisko Vienonen, Secretary

Kansalaisjärjestö Itsenäisyyden Puolesta RY
("For the Independence" Association)
Heikki Eskelinen, Hon. Chairman
Raimo Rosendahl, Chairman

Suomalais-Kaukasialainen Yhdistys
(Finnish-Caucasian Association)
Heikki Riihijärvi, Chairman
Aila Niinimaa-Keppo, Vice Chairman

Suomi-Georgia-Seura RY
(Finland-Georgia Society)
Aila Niinimaa-Keppo, Chairman
Reno Siradze, Vice Chairman


  • Open Radio 2x2 [Nov. 27, 1996, 22:30]: "...Aslan Maskhadov declared -- in nearest future representations of Chechen Republic Ichkeria in Turkey, Jordan and Baltic states would be converted to embassies...".

  • REPRESENTATION OF CHECHEN REPUBLIC OPENS IN WARSAW. DECEMBER 14. /RIA Novosti correspondent Viktor Nesterov/. "...The official opening of a representation of the self-proclaimed Chechen Republic of Ichkeria took place in the Polish capital Friday evening. It was time for the conclusion of the work of the Third International Roundtable on Chechnya. As Ikhvan Gerikhanov, Chairman of the Constitutional Court of Chechnya, declared at the ceremony, the opening of the representation must show to the entire world that the Chechen people has the right to open its official missions abroad..."

  • CHECHEN FLAG OVER WARSAW DRAWS MOSCOW'S IRE. Leonid KORNILOV. "...A "roundtable" on restoration of Chechnya, peace in the Caucasus and democracy in Russia was held in Warsaw, Poland, on December 11 to 13. It was organised by the local authorities of Warsaw and Krakow and the Krakow-based Chechen Information Centre, which Moscow has protested against for nearly two years now. The conference was financed by the Warsaw self-government, which signed a "treaty of brotherhood and co-operation with Chechnya" in January 1995. Alla Dudayeva attended the "roundtable" as a guest of honour. First Vice-Premier Khozhahmet Nukhayev and Foreign Minister Ruslan Chimayev represented the government of the Chechen Republic. (Izvestia, December 15.)..."


Statement of Representative of the
President of Chechen Republic Ichkeria in Finland
on "Moscow Cup 17.10.1996"

Informational, Cultural and Economic Representation
of Chechen Republic Ichkeria in Finland --
Statement on Novie Atagi provocation 17.12.1996


Information from Finland

  • Pääministeri pakolaisena. Georgian expääministeri Bessarion Gugushvili Kaukasian konfliktien keskeltä Suomeen. Toimittajana Leena Niinimaa. Ylen Ykkönen Torstai 14.03.96 Päivän ohjelmatiedot 140396 YLE/tied. 18.03 Maailmanpyörä.

  • "Dudajevin leski aikoo pyytää poliittista turvapaikkaa Suomesta", Tarja Laaksonen, 'Iltalehti', 25 Jun 1996, No 144, p.3

  • "Tshetsheenien edustusto Suomen", Jan Erola, 'Iltalehti', 23 Sep. 1996, No 221, p.5

  • "Riihijarvi oli tshetsheeni-tiedotuksen pioneeri", Jan Erola, 'Iltalehti', 23 Sep. 1996, No 221, p.5

  • Tshetsheenit perustaneet Suomeen toimiston. Tshetsheenit ovat perustaneet Suomeen toimiston, jonka tarkoituksena on kehittää Suomen ja Tshetshenian välisiä suhteita. Asiasta kertoneen Yleisradion radiouutisten mukaan toimistoa johtaa georgialainen Vissarion Gugushvili. Hän asuu Suomessa poliittisena pakolaisena. 96.09.23. (MTV3, Päivitetty 08:03)

  • "Tuhottu Tshetshenia tarvitsee apua", Martti Valkonen, 'Helsingin Sanomat', 29 Sep. 1996, D, p.4

  • Press-Conference of Representative of the President of ChRI and Finnish-Caucasian Association in Helsinki, 1 Oct. 1996

  • "Georgian Pääministeri asuu Vantaa",  Markko Laitinen, 'APU', 25.10.1996, p.27

  • "Europaan neuvosto koulii Venäjää", Martti Valkonen, Cristian Westerback, 'Helsingin Sanomat', 17.11.1996.

  • "VENÄJÄ ON SAIRAS", Georgian pääministeri vaatii vapauttav 'Ajan Suunta', 4/1996, Sunnuntai 8.12.1996

  • "Georgian mielipidevangit vapaiksi!", 'Ajan Suunta', 4/1996, Sunnuntai 8.12.1996

  • "Tshetshenian surmatöille on monta motiivia", Aila Niinimaa-Keppo, 'Iltalehti', 23.12.1996, p.6

  • "Punaisen Ristin työntekijät jättivät jäähyväiset tovereilleen Genevessä", 'Helsingin Sanomat', 20.12.1996, p.C2

  • "Tshetsheenit voittivat maansa isännyyden", 'Helsingin Sanomat', 31.12.1996

  • "Dzhohar Dudajev kuoli silmieni edessa (Tshetsheenijohtajan leski Alla Dudajeva tyrmää sitkeät huhut, että hänen miehensä olisi elossa)", Anu Kuistiala, 'Ilta-Sanomat', 23.1.1997, p.14

  • "CAUCASUS and an unholy alliance". 1977, Vantaa (Finland). Pages: 256, ISBN: 952-9752-16-4. Articles by Zviad Gamsakhurdia, Jokhar Dudaev, Abdulfaz Elchibey, etc.

  • Seminar: "Russia and Islam", 17-18 Oct. 1997, Helsinki. Finnish Institute for Russian and East European Studies.


Chechen Republic Ichkeria - Government
Special Selection of International News, Articles, etc. * from the previous war

 

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

 Cover Page | Table of Contents | BPG 1996 | [email protected] | Feedback

See who's visiting this page.

1