Question # 2: Evolution or Creation?
�
Charles Darwin
(a prominent
figure in evolution) said that there is one way to
prove evolution true: the number of transitional
fossils found in the geologic record must be �truly
enormous.�
�
When
Darwin found no transitional fossils, he concluded,
��this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious
objection which can be urged against the theory.�
(Darwin,
Charles R., "The Origin of Species by Means of
Natural Selection," [1872], Everyman's Library, J.M.
Dent & Sons: London, 6th Edition, 1928, reprint,
pp.292-293).
�
To
this day, from ape to man, all the �missing links�
have been scientifically disproved (see
table below).
�
If you
take a laptop computer, a robot, a
747 jumbo jet, and a worm, and ask any
scientist which one of those 4 is more intricately
designed, his/her answer will be: the worm.
�
Scientists understand that the intricate detail of
an eye or a digestive system is remarkable
�
If the
other 3 objects had a creator and a designer, then
not only would the worm have to have a creator and a
designer, but it would have to have a much greater
and more intelligent designer than the other 3
objects.
�
Therefore, it makes absolutely no sense to say that
the worm happened by chance
Previous Question |
Next Question |
