On Sept. 10, Michael, known for violent acts, returned to the place where he was barred for throwing a fist at someone, and other acts of violence. Since the place is a publicly-available place, no one could prevent him from entering again. He therefore entered again, and probably will even more, but it was quietly said, if he enters once more, he will enter behind bars for criminal trespass. The author is not in a position to ask for any update on that man`s private situation about this.
Point is, the barring is unlike the below-described banning, in that the banned one below was prevented from entering through an entrance for even a second:
He was kicked and banned, not allowed and not able to return. This is his response.
She complained about getting reply to a notice in the e-mail about the worries of an editor that someone they both knew was "wanted" by the law and possibly headed for arrest. The reply was from the reportedly "wanted" man. Merely because the e-mail reply made it clear that the reader should head over to savesale.2ya.com for more details, she and possibly others classified the e-mail as "spam". She has almost zero understanding of what it is like, how hard it is, to run a company which must leave open and also create new opportunites for dozens or hundreds of personnel. That same lack of understanding is lacking within many supposed technological operators....who are willing to forbid the entrance of a chatter based on the invalid complaints of one other lying person. While they forbid the entry of that lone chatter, they also reduce the opportunities for chat to benefit the lives of the chat users. They have no clue how to benefit the lives to the maximum. When a company is run by one who knows how to benefit the lives of those involved to the maximum, everyone benefits, opportunities to profit for all involved soar:
Operators of chat rooms need to compare their activites with that of company founders and owners. An example must be stated from the chat life of Savesale Online creator Mason L. Mikosky:
There was a room (chatting channel) at Talk City named Courtship1, also described on savesale.2ya.com. During a three-month period in that room in 1999, a webtv user named Mason L. Mikosky ("savesale") was in the midst of a campaign to increase the attendance in the room. He was successfully leading many fellow webtv users into that room, and enabling them to return easily. Also, because of the greeting and friendly nature of that campaigner, others noticed his propensity toward hosting and remarked on it. This is an example of how an op should act!!
Talk City was a business with employees, as well as unpaid robots, all used to perform functions. Many of the employees throughout Talk City history were channel/room hosts, to the obedience of Talk City. Mikosky never denied that Talk City hosts (TCC`s and CCC`s) had the right and obligation to host the rooms. He only felt he had his own input on how it could be done in the same as in better ways. He acted as he felt he must act to be himself.
Mikosky contrasts those paid host-employees to those who have tried to "op" rooms without pay which often were not the porperty of the "ops".