|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Truth,
Virtue and Me. |
© 2002 Sachin
|
|
|
I hate it when somebody tells me that
I am a good human. It just surges like a wave of hatred through my whole
body like a electric current. My life is being wasted living in these closed
walls of ‘virtue’. Constraints! How many constraints should I adhere to?
Boundaries! How many limits do I not cross? That ‘Best of Men’ – Maryada
Purushottam also believed in a washer man, isn’t it? He too was desirous
of that virtue, isn’t it? Like him, how many people roam with a ‘visage’
of goodness? Living in grey areas and backstabbing for selfish interests?
I am fed up of these visages. Those always assuming and taking for granted
the soothing shade of a tree should also get to bear the scorching heat of
a desert sun.
But for it something needs to ignite
– like a lone tensile flame, from a bundle of ash and should rise like a
Phoenix.
When one accepts to live within boundaries,
there are always problems – even of the path of truth. The Maharbharata
is an evidence as to how the righteous Pandavas, had to
resort of various ‘immoralities’ to win what was heralded as the battle of
Truth and Virtue. ‘Everything is fair in war,’ do you say?
A hundred Kauravas
and five Pandavas. Evil outnumbered good and Good outlived Evil. But
who decides what is good? Who defines evil? Wasn’t Duryodhana
right in desiring for a throne and fighting for it? You might point to his
usage of unfair tactics. Well, but you just said “Everything is fair in war”.
The killing of Bheeshma, the slaying
of Dronacharya, the deceptive use of Ghatotkach and the biggest
of them – the slaying of Karna. You want more? Why did Krishna
have to narrate the Gita to make Arjun fight a battle that
he did not want to? Why did Krishna have to break his vow and take the Sudarshan
Chakra to slay Bheeshma, when Arjun could not? Why did
he have to point out Karna’s follies and ask Arjun to kill
him unarmed, when he himself knew a lot more about Karna?
Behind each victory of Truth are there
not such cheatings rampant? Compromise of moralities, adjustment and principles,
justifications given as ‘tit for tat’? Why should the balance tip in favour
of Evil for Virtue to be worshipped everywhere? Why?
If it was
not so, Kunti would never have let go of her motherhood, would have
left Karna to fend for himself. She would not have robbed him of his
right. What kind of mother is she, who cannot let go of her virtue and accept
her motherhood when she recognised Karna? What angst would a Suryaputra
have gone through living life as a Sutaputra?
‘She did
accept her motherhood, didn’t she?’ you would tell me. But when? When she
knew he would commit a so-called crime in killing all his brothers. But wasn’t
it her selfishness? And Karna in that disgraced state tells her that
she would have five sons after the battle. For a single friend, he fights
the battle of his life and in the end gives the ultimate sacrifice – the last
gift – his own life for his mother, through empty hands!
That Karna,
is the real hero of Mahabharata.
But then,
he too was trying to caress his virtue. Trying to mask his sorrow and disgrace
of his lowly charioteer’s heritage under the adjective of Danshoor.
Why was the need to be admired by the world as a Danshoor? Did he not
care for this virtue for selfishness?
I too seem
to have done the same. But unlike him, I cant stretch the burden till the
End. My kavach-kundalas are not available foe charity! I need an escape.
Don’t suggest
me any escapes. Don’t preach. Don’t advise me. Everybody here wears a dumb
spectacled look and acts as an intellectual. If I agree to that, I will come
out of a pit and fall in a valley – it’s a Chakravyooha. I will search
my own path. Allow me the freedom. I just need that ‘virtue’ from you.
|
|
|
|
© 2002 Sachin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|