California Enemies
See also www.antipeonage.0catch.com
California's new Department of Child Support Services coordinates the Peonage effort in the Golden State. Its Links page connects up with those county support enforcement agencies that have their own web sites. These are the family support sections of the county district attorneys' offices given a new name and reorganized into independent county agencies. The elected district attorneys no longer have responsibility for enforcing support orders. These agencies include:
Alameda County Department of Child Support Services
Butte County Department of Child Support Services
Contra Costa County Department of Child Support Services
Del Norte County Department of Child Support Services
El Dorado County Office of Child Support Services
Fresno County Department of Child Support Services
Glenn County Child Support Services Agency
Humboldt County Department of Child Support Services
Imperial County Department of Child Support Services
Kern County Department of Child Support Services
Kings County Department of Child Support Services. At least they "thank you" for paying child support. Dear Abby once advised that no thanks were necessary for paying child support. It is like a plantation owner thanking a slave for not running away, a hacienda owner for thanking a peon for not running away, and a prison warden thanking a prisoner for not trying to escape.
Lake County Department of Child Support Services
Los Angeles County Child Support Services Department
Merced County Department of Child Support Services. Merced is Spanish for mercy. Do they have any? The reason for constitutional provisions is so we don't have to rely on the mercy of our government officials. When we set aside these constitutional provisions we force the people affected to rely upon such mercy. Our Constitution of the United States was established, by violence, because mercy wasn't good enough. It was amended to prohibit slavery and to require due process and equal protection of the laws, by violence, again, because mercy was not a good enough remedy for those held in involuntary servitude and denied equal protection of the laws.
Monterey County Child Support Services Now this web site has the ultimate declaration of contradiction! It declares that it "is the policy of the State of California to ensure that all individuals are treated equally and no person shall, on the basis of race, color, national origin, political affiliation, religion, marital status, sex, age, or disability, be excluded from participation or denied the benefits of any program or service or otherwise subjected to treatment that is different than that provided to others." Since marital status is included, I must say that this statement prohibits imprisoning noncustodial parents for not supporting their children when custodial parents who do not support their children are given money and parents who remain married and retain custody of their children do not suffer from abusive treatment by this agency. But then if constitutional provisions can be ignored, what's a mere statement of policy?
Orange County Child Support Services
Placer County Child Support Services. The new gold rush. Your money. This agency helps the other definition of "gold digger". Only if you are as barren of gold as the dirt in too many claims, you suffer.
Plumas County Department of Child Support Services
Riverside County Department of Child Support Services
Sacramento County Department of Child Support Services
San Bernardino County Department of Child Support Services. "Helping children today so they can pay child support tomorrow." A minor revision to their motto to more accurately reflect the truth. Includes Corydon John Nelson, WSBA 1015, formerly with the Family Support Division of the King County, Washington Prosecutor. He apparently still maintains a residence at 3816 West Fulton Street, Seattle, Washington 98199.
San Diego Department of Child Support Services
San Francisco Department of Child Support Services. It is one thing to leave your heart in San Francisco. Just don't leave your child there. What? You mean they did not give you a choice? Maybe that is why so many there are gay, it avoids this hassle.
San Joaquin County Department of Child Support Services
San Mateo County Department of Child Support Services
Santa Barbara County Department of Child Support Services
Santa Clara County Department of Child Support Services
Santa Cruz County Department of Child Support Services
Siskyou Modoc Regional Department of Child Support Services. This is the traditional home of the Modoc Tribe. They put up a hell of a fight for their freedom. We can do the same. By nonviolent means, of course.
Solano County Department of Child Support Services
Sonoma County Child Support Services
Stanislaus County Department of Child Support Services
Sutter County Department of Child Support Services
Trinity County Department of Child Support Services. They try to force the Father to pay support for the Son. Which he could if he can live off what will only support the Holy Ghost.
Tulare County Department of Child Support Services, Before this function was taken over by the California State government, Deputy District Attorney Gary H. Evans under District Attorney William A. Richmond worked the support enforcement process for this county.
Ventura County Child Support Services
Yolo County Child Support Services, Before this function was taken over by the California State government, Deputy District Attorney William C. Schemel under District Attorney Richard L. Gilbert worked the support enforcement process for this county.
Yuba County Department of Child Support Services One of the answers to the Frequently Asked Questions on this web page is that the services provided are free. Wrong. You paid for them with your taxes. The question is, can you live with your tax money being used to violate OUR constitutional rights? It is easy to pretend that when a defense attorney valiantly defends the constitutional rights of a defendant charged with a horrible crime, it is not OUR constitutional rights that he is defending. When a noncustodial parent is imprisoned for this debt, it is not OUR constitutional right to not be imprisoned for debt that is being violated. But they are OUR constitutional rights. When given up, even for as ostensibly a good cause as providing for our children, WE lose our protection from the overzealousness of whomever we may elect to our government. In fact, it is because of the claim that this it for the children, is what makes it all the more evil.
Many of these county sites claim that they "deliver child support services in a manner that maintains the respect and dignity of all who come in contact with our agency." Given that under the present laws "delivering child support services" necessarily violates the 13th Amendment and the Antipeonage Act, and the California Constitution's prohibitions of involuntary servitude, Article I Section 6, and imprisonment for debt, Article I Section 10, I would say that it is impossible to maintain the respect and dignity of all whose rights are violated. Article I Section 7(a) contains the state Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, also necessarily violated. Article I Section 17 prohibits excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishments. Article I Section 26 of the California Constitution declares that its provisions are mandatory, unless declared otherwise by express words. So which provision has the express words declaring that the California Constitution is not mandatory in cases of child support?
Speaking of "Children"! Have you heard about the wacky Ventura County Superior Court order requiring parents to pay $3,500 per month to support their 50 YEAR OLD child!!!!!! David Culp is 50 years old, had been an attorney who practiced for 20 years, made a good living at it, but now because he is "bipolar", depressed, and has attention deficit disorder (means he can't pay any attention to anything for any length of time) his aging parents have to come up with the money or go to jail themselves.
Believe it or not, I can understand it. 20 years practicing before judges like these, judges who think the Constitution is a suggestion, who cannot read and comprehend the English language in which our Constitution and our statutes are written with at least the capability that we expect of our 4th graders when they take the Basic Skills Test, who will go along with any fad that comes down the pike, and decide that the Antipeonage Act does not mean what it says; well, it would make anybody a candidate for the funny farm!!
This of course, is why we have to stop tolerating the willful violation of our Constitution. If we allow it for one purpose, we strip ALL people of its protection. They can always come up with a justification or an excuse.
This is the State where the Brent Moss case was litigated. While the California Court of Appeals did the job, the California Supreme Court violated its oath of office to support, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of California, when it affirmed as to annulment of contempt but then reversed the finding that the 13th Amendment, Article I Section 6 of the California Constitution, and the Antipeonage Act covered child support.
Feel free to e-mail me at [email protected] with any information that you have to share.
If the back button does not take you there, click Home to go to the Index page of this Antipeonage Act Website, click Enemies for the main Enemies page, click Letters for the Letters page, and click Allies for the Allies page. Or you can use the Antipeonage Act Site Map.