|
| |
| Richard Busacca, Ph. D. |
| Social Science 600 - Seminar in Method and Interdisciplinary Analysis |
| This SFSU class is only for social science seniors. |
|
| Dominates over black people |
|
Heck, the guy improperly dominates every
conversation, but I have noticed that he is very committed to controlling
black people. An example from class where he treated a black
woman rudely was when he blurted out that the statistics she had just mentioned from a journal article were
incorrect. Who is he to claim to be the expert on a study
published in a scholarly paper. She was presenting her findings
from articles on her subject. If he would have done that to me, I
would have said, "Right, like I would believe you; no thanks, I
have my good source right here. If you want to prove it wrong, be
my guest and try." Another time he wouldn't let her volunteer
for a certain day to present her articles, but it was done on the basis
of people raising there hands. He said, "No, you won't be
ready yet, her name." Busacca is obsessed with discussing the
lifestyle or problems of blacks: He has went on about Afro-Cuban music,
hip-hop music, public housing, Castros involvement in Angola, and how
uncomfortable he was hearing his lawyer talk about his black tenant in an
unfavorable light. Right, the man who openly puts down people
(Professor Kennedy or people in our class) is prudish in the mix of
diverse opinions - WRONG, he is a control freak.. I believe
he wants to 'manage' blacks as much as he possibly can; that tells you
what his opinion of blacks is. Yes, it
was proper to say to the lawyer to please don't talk about my tenant
that way; the reality is, he can't defend himself when dealing with a
stronger personality. The reality is, a far left extremist like him is
not used to people telling him their contrary opinions. Another important factor in that episode was
money; Busacca was depending on his cheap lawyer to get his tenant
evicted. What an asshole to even bring up his little stories all
the time. He wants you to think he stands up for blacks, but
really he thinks blacks are on a lower level, that they need constant
guidance by his controlling hand. |
| Obsessed with politics |
|
He tells us about how he is steamed at the Bush
administration in telling CNN not to tell about our war maneuvers,
pro-abortion matters and Sweden's domestic policies that allow mothers
to have their children in childcare, how Bush didn't want the U.S. to go
to the "racism conference" in Africa. He is trying to
get people to think he is on the side of blacks, but I firmly believe
radical lefties try very hard to keep people of color in a new form of
slavery, i.e. count on the Democrat party to get you your government
payments, affirmative action, and civil rights. Being a strong
Republican, I maintain that the GOP is the party of equality. The
Republican North freed the slaves and more Republicans voted for the
Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Dems don't want you to consider
those important facts, of course. He
has dumbed down the curriculum and adopted a forceful, pro-left
indoctrination agenda. Just what it takes to produce low wage,
blind-to-reality, immoral workers who will follow the Democrat
party to victory! How original! |
| Does not meet curriculum standards |
|
He once in a while has actually taught,
albeit his style would be more suited to a class of deviant prisoners or
mentally retarded people. He plays guessing games with the
class. For example, he spent way too much time demonstrating how
to form a theory. In fact that is the main thing he has covered so
far. We have spent lots of time guessing the answers he was
looking for on topics such as why people cluster in hallways, why gay
men may engage in risky sex, when marriages are likely to break up, and
the causes and results of homelessness. He didn't present any
sources for his information, and in fact, I find it disgraceful to let
the liberals in my class believe that a free market economy is a
principle factor for homelessness. That is just another example of
a nutty professor hyping up liberal lies. The dizziest girl in the
class blurted out immediately the answer to the cause of homelessness -
'no price controls'. Right away Busacca writes that on the board and
goes with it. What an asshole. Most of our class time is playing guessing games for his little theories and presenting
articles students find. Each student has to present nine articles
over the semester. This was the class I most looked forward to
this semester, but on the first day, I realized this Busacca was a dysfunctional
teacher. I would like to learn about how to do and
interpret research studies, but am being cheated by this fat-cat,
government worker who dishes out propaganda every day. I am not
prepared to read research studies and interpret the complex charts and
statistics they use. Our text book covers simple, political
studies, but what am I to do when I open a scholarly journal or book
that is much more complex than his course book, which is basically an
introduction book. |
| Is not qualified to be the chair of the
Social Science Dept. |
|
He has a Ph. D. in political science as I
understand. There is a political science program at SFSU in the
College of Political Science, so why is he qualified to chair the social
science program? I have yet to hear that one. He has a dirty
mouth and mind. His favorite curse word for his classroom
performances is 'motherfucker'. On the first or second day of
class he told us about a student's paper that dealt with a pro-child sex
agenda. He didn't just mention it, he described the argument and
then he has brought up that paper on other days in class. The man
is a total radical who insults my sensitive nature. He tells us
stories from his personal life - his trouble with past tenants (he is a
landlord, don't you know), his sit-ins at Berkeley in the '60s, and how
he had to adapt to changing sex roles in the era of his youth.
readers'
feedback on Busacca review
|
Back to Busacca page
Home
Send in a teacher review |
|