w  o  r  d  s


            Whosoever Blesses Them
            The intifada and its defenders.
            by Larry Miller
            04/22/2002 12:00:00 AM

                              Larry Miller, contributing humorist

                  I WAS WATCHING Greta Van Facelift on Fox the other night, and
                  she and her guests made me talk back to the TV. Shout back,
                  actually. Nothing witty or trenchant, you understand, just
                  something like, "Oh, come on!" Now, to be honest, it was late,
                  and I was downstairs alone, and I was a little, what's the
                  word . . . loaded, yes, that's the word. I was a little shined
                  up. A little spiffed and a little miffed, and I shouted
                  something and angrily turned off the remote. I don't know
                  exactly how angrily a remote can be turned off, but as angrily
                  as you can push a pfennig-sized piece of round plastic, that's
                  how angrily I did it. Then I walked back to the bar, made
                  myself one-for-the-stairs (as opposed to one-for-the-road) and
                  read some P.G. Wodehouse to restore my cheery nature. But back
                  to the freshly-tightened Greta.

                  Her guests were (INSERT INDISTINGUISHABLE ARAB NAME), from
                  Hamas, and their attorney, Stanley Cohen. No, that's not a
                  joke. Would that it were. Stanley Cohen, the attorney for
                  Hamas. Check that handle again: Stanley Cohen. I mean, if you
                  tried to make up a better name than that, you couldn't do it.
                  Let's give it a shot, though, shall we? Irving Lefkowitz. Nah,
                  too obvious. Lew Fishman. No, no, sounds like a carpet
                  salesman. Isaac Bashevis Singer? Now I'm reaching. Nope, you
                  just can't beat good ol' Stan Cohen. Yes, Stanley Cohen,
                  folks, a hard-left, righteously indignant true-believer, an
                  honors graduate from the William Kunstler School of
                  Just-Not-Getting-It-And-Never-Will, who had flown all the way
                  from New York to sit next to his wonderful client over there
                  in not the land of milk and honey. Stanley Cohen. A man who,
                  if he listened very carefully, would no doubt hear voices in
                  the next room planning to blow the eyes out of more of his
                  nieces and nephews. Stanley Cohen, and even typing that name
                  right now and remembering this horrible man damning his own
                  people again and again and again, I crack a nervous smile,
                  because they're my people, too, and, God help me, if I didn't
                  laugh, I think I might cry.

                  Oddly enough, out of the three of them, the homunculus from
                  Hamas didn't bother me at all. I mean, if you think about it,
                  why should he bother any American? We know exactly who he is
                  and, in a way, we should be grateful for that. Because if
                  we're only willing to absorb their own words--nevermind their
                  demonic deeds--he and his brethren have a perfectly
                  uncomplicated point of view and agenda, and their clarity
                  should give us our own clarity, and wouldn't that be
                  refreshing? You want us dead? Well, now, isn't that a funny
                  coincidence. Guess what we want?

                  My point is, if American TV calls up and wants to put these
                  philanthropists on, who could blame them for saying, "Sure!" I
                  can just see them bursting out laughing and slapping each
                  other on the back. ("They're going to put us on Fox TV! I told
                  you terror works! And I'll bet their Green Room beats the snot
                  out of Al Jazeera. I mean, please, how many olives can you
                  eat?") If we're stupid enough to do that, I don't blame them
                  for taking us up on it. All they have to do is take a few
                  minutes away from packing rusty nails around the C4, pick one
                  of their guys who looks, relatively, the least like a vicious
                  scumbag, borrow a suit, and send him forth to smile for the
                  cameras. With Stanley Cohen.

                  But let's leave the newly-stretched Greta for a moment, as
                  well as our friends Stanley and Ishmael (no joke, his real
                  name). A brief overview of the situation is always valuable,
                  so as a service to all Americans who still don't get it, I now
                  offer you the story of the Middle East in just a few
                  paragraphs, which is all you really need. Don't thank me. I'm
                  a giver. Here we go:

                  The Palestinians want their own country. There's just one
                  thing about that: There are no Palestinians. It's a made up
                  word. Israel was called Palestine for two thousand years. Like
                  "Wiccan," "Palestinian" sounds ancient but is really a modern
                  invention. Before the Israelis won the land in war, Gaza was
                  owned by Egypt, and there were no "Palestinians" then, and the
                  West Bank was owned by Jordan, and there were no
                  "Palestinians" then. As soon as the Jews took over and started
                  growing oranges as big as basketballs, what do you know, say
                  hello to the "Palestinians," weeping for their deep bond with
                  their lost "land" and "nation." So for the sake of honesty,
                  let's not use the word "Palestinian" any more to describe
                  these delightful folks, who dance for joy at our deaths until
                  someone points out they're being taped. Instead, let's call
                  them what they are: "Other Arabs From The Same General Area
                  Who Are In Deep Denial About Never Being Able To Accomplish
                  Anything In Life And Would Rather Wrap Themselves In The
                  Seductive Melodrama Of Eternal Struggle And Death." I know
                  that's a bit unwieldy to expect to see on CNN. How about this,
                  then: "Adjacent Jew-Haters."

                  Okay, so the Adjacent Jew-Haters want their own country. Oops,
                  just one more thing. No, they don't. They could've had their
                  own country any time in the last thirty years, especially two
                  years ago at Camp David. But if you have your own country, you
                  have to have traffic lights and garbage trucks and Chambers of
                  Commerce, and, worse, you actually have to figure out some way
                  to make a living. That's no fun. No, they want what all the
                  other Jew-Haters in the region want: Israel. They also want a
                  big pile of dead Jews, of course--that's where the real fun
                  is--but mostly they want Israel. Why? For one thing, trying to
                  destroy Israel--or "The Zionist Entity" as their textbooks
                  call it--for the last fifty years has allowed the rulers of
                  Arab countries to divert the attention of their own people
                  away from the fact that they're the blue-ribbon most
                  illiterate, poorest, and tribally backward on God's Earth, and
                  if you've ever been around God's Earth, you know that's really
                  saying something. It makes me roll my eyes every time one of
                  our pundits waxes poetic about the great history and culture
                  of the Muslim Mideast. Unless I'm missing something, the Arabs
                  haven't given anything to the world since Algebra, and, by the
                  way, thanks a hell of a lot for that one.

                  Chew this around and spit it out: Five hundred million Arabs;
                  five million Jews. Think of all the Arab countries as a
                  football field, and Israel as a pack of matches sitting in the
                  middle of it. And now these same folks swear that if Israel
                  gives them half of that pack of matches, everyone will be
                  pals. Really? Wow, what neat news. Hey, but what about the
                  string of wars to obliterate the tiny country and the constant
                  din of rabid blood oaths to drive every Jew into the sea? Oh,
                  that? We were just kidding.

                  My friend Kevin Rooney made a gorgeous point the other day:
                  Just reverse the numbers. Imagine five hundred million Jews
                  and five million Arabs. I was stunned at the simple brilliance
                  of it. Can anyone picture the Jews strapping belts of razor
                  blades and dynamite to themselves? Of course not. Or
                  marshalling every fiber and force at their disposal for
                  generations to drive a tiny Arab state into the sea? Nonsense.
                  Or dancing for joy at the murder of innocents? Impossible. Or
                  spreading and believing horrible lies about the Arabs baking
                  their bread with the blood of children? Disgusting. No, as you
                  know, left to themselves in a world of peace, the worst Jews
                  would ever do to people is debate them to death.

                  Mr. Bush, God bless him, is walking a tightrope. I understand
                  that with vital operations coming up against Iraq and others,
                  it's in our interest, as Americans, to try to stabilize our
                  Arab allies as much as possible, and, after all, that can't be
                  much harder than stabilizing a roomful of supermodels who've
                  just had their drugs taken away. However, in any big-picture
                  strategy, there's always a danger of losing moral weight.

                  We've already lost some. After September 11 our president told
                  us and the world he was going to root out all terrorists and
                  the countries that supported them. Beautiful. Then the
                  Israelis, after months and months of having the equivalent of
                  an Oklahoma City every week (and then every day) start to do
                  the same thing we did, and we tell them to show restraint. If
                  America were being attacked with an Oklahoma City every day,
                  we would all very shortly be screaming for the administration
                  to just be done with it and kill everything south of the
                  Mediterranean and east of the Jordan. (Hey, wait a minute,
                  that's actually not such a bad id . . . uh, that is, what a
                  horrible thought, yeah, horrible.)

                  There's bad news on the losing moral weight front, and the
                  signs are out there. Last week, the day after Secretary Powell
                  left on his mission (whatever that was), the Los Angeles Times
                  ran its lead editorial in one hundred percent support of the
                  trip and the pressure he and President Bush were putting on
                  Israel. Here's a good rule of thumb: If the Los Angeles Times
                  thinks you're doing a great job, everything you're doing is
                  wrong, stupid and mortally dangerous. If they think everything
                  you're doing is wrong, stupid and mortally dangerous, you're
                  doing a great job, and, in fact, your chances are probably
                  very good for getting on the fast track for sainthood.

                  So, now, back to Greta. You know what made me mad enough to
                  shout? You might not even think it was that big a thing.
                  After the show she said to these guys, "Thank you, gentlemen,
                  for being my guests." "Gentlemen." "Guests." "My guests."
                  That's what it's come to with these non-judgmental hosts and
                  hostesses. Nice, huh? "Thank you, Mr. Stalin, sir, for being
                  so gracious in giving us your valuable time." "My eternal
                  gratitude, Chairman Mao, for taking precious moments away from
                  your splendid Five-Year Plan and visiting with us in this most
                  convivial way."

                  And I winced, and grunted, and shouted. Oh, yeah, and made
                  that drink.

                  I mean, please, folks. In 1941, did reporters feel it was
                  their duty to give equal time to Hitler and Hirohito? Would
                  Stanley Cohen have represented them? Ok, Stanley probably
                  would have, but would any American have stood still while he
                  told us about it?

                  Larry Miller is a contributing humorist to The Daily Standard
                  and a writer, actor, and comedian living in Los Angeles.








Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1