candy6

To my knowledge, all aboriginal groups maintain sexual taboos. However, these restrictions vary enormously. One group's perversion is accepted practice across the lake.

Typically these taboos address gene-pool procreative strategies, not diversity of sexual practice. Compared to aboriginal groups, sexual control by the modern State over males is draconian, brutal, and counter-productive as concerns child-safety. Tellingly, lack of coercive sexuality, or coercive repressions of sexuality, is marked amongst most aboriginal groups, and children are very safe in such cultures.

The civilizations of the modern West, however, are mass entities, and children indeed are more vulnerable to sexual coercion because the �tribe� is now huge and often anonymous.

Complicating matters, civilization owes its existence and maintenance to manipulation of male libido. Thus the dilemma of the Nymph cannot be approached directly -- else the game is up. Making conscious the Nymph is an eschatological event. In a sense, it terminates both civilization and history. That is why the taboo is inflexible, whether refracted in the Fallen Host of Judeo-Christianity, or in current codifications, scapegoating and psycho-social denial.

It appears that, as a species, we have yet to grow out of adolescence. The same certainly can be said for America, whose approach to sexuality is juvenile and sophomoric.

The re-arising in the West of the Nymph -- and especially consciousness of her sexualized power -- are signposts of mass transformation in collective consciousness, values and institutions. She is Kore, Queen of Hades. When she surfaces, in short-shorts and a halter, all hell breaks loose.

The shift from hetaerism (pre-conscious, pan-sexual humanity) to the early matriarchies conferred vast power on the feminine. Under matriarchy, the matrons and crones decided when sexual transgression occurred, and what punishment males would suffer. As with Ms. Gehring, of course, in the Paleolithic and early-Neolithic matriarchies, the feminine was incapable of transgression.

From this base wider restrictions on male libido and freedom were built. "Patriarchy" and the rise of civilization owe their lives to the sexual subjugation of males.

Vampirism of male libido is the chief tool of both matiarchy and "patriarchy." The Nymph is far too valuable simply to be released. That's why there was war in heaven once, and once again.

The sexuality of children reveals the underpinnings of Western civilization�s dynamo � the male �sacrifice,� the channeling of male body and spirit into the products and processes of material and technological culture. Male energy is incited by the feminine, then siphoned off. The female projects her guilt for the turning of sexuality into power by fixing Scapegoat status onto the masculine.

The fantasy that female children lack sexual urges (while male children do) actually increases libidic charge in males -- which is indeed society�s occult aim, the ongoing goal of the female collective since estrus was jettisoned, at very latest. Unconsciously inflamed males are at once stupendously creative and tractable, double-handcuffed by manipulated desire and false "mores."

Human females, like their primate cousins, once followed the sexual dictates of estrus. To her shock, Jane Goodall observed that individual primates can will estrus on. We may speculate that at some point in evolution human females willed estrus �off.� A female primate in 365-day-a-year sexual receptivity is a POTENT female primate. A twelve-year-old modern female in cutoffs and a bare midriff with �Got Candy?� on her budding breasts is Grrrl Power incarnate, a female primate of Extreme Empowerment.