
In the fourteen years during which time I published adult magazines, followed by thirteen years running various sex clubs, I have never once heard or read a rational debate about adult/child sex. During that twenty-seven year period I have read dozens of articles by people vehemently opposed to pedophilia and violently opposed to pedophiles, including threats to cut off their balls or blow out their brainsAnd I've read or heard comments from pedophiles who insist that children enjoy sex with adults and after all, it's only "education." I've often wondered whether society is ready for a rational, non hysterical debate on the subject. After-all, you can't deal with a problem adequately so long as you don't know what you're talking about, what you're up against, or who you're dealing with.
We know that Catholic priests are the worst offenders, followed closely by Anglicans and Jehovah's Witnesses, but do we know just how widespread the problem is?
First, I'd like to get religionists off my back by pointing out that the Bible condones the violent and sexual abuse of children. 'Proverbs' instructs parents to abuse their children physically, and Moses ordered his soldiers to finger little girls to establish which were virgins and which were not. Then after slaughtering the non virgins he told his butchers to keep the little virgin girls for themselves (Numbers 31:1-18.) Yummo, hot little virgin pussy for the use of! And all in God's name!
Lot invited thugs to rape his virgin daughters (Genesis 19:7-8) and ended up fucking them himself. (Genesis 19:33-35.) Naturally he blamed the girls for the incest, as any cowardly pedophile would. Then there's good King David, who on his deathbed, fondled a captive pre-pubescent girl to restore his flagging libido. (1 King 1:1-4) Seeing as the number one love in his life was Jonathon, he'd have been better off with a little boy. Sleazy old bugger.
These crimes against children were committed by God's chosen heroes. Moses was the man God trusted with his Ten Commandments, Lot was the only man saved from the destruction of Sodom, and David was King supremo. Clearly God thought these kiddie fuckers were wonderful fellows. The Ten Commandments, incidentally, contain not one word in favor of kindness to children. God was far to busy ordering men to bow down and pay homage to him to give a damn about children. In fact when some kids called a man "old baldhead," God had forty-two children ripped apart by wild bears (2 Kings 2: 23-24.)
And when he wasn't ripping them apart, Lord God, "Merciful Father" Jehovah was forcing parents to eat their children (2 Kings 6:28-29. Lamentations 4:10-11) "The Lord hath accomplished his wrath." So please, christians and Jews, spare me your plattitudes about morality and decency.
Mohammed was in lust with a six year old child, Aisha, so Muslims can fuck off too.
We're told that children's sexuality is "latent" and that it doesn't emerge till puberty. That's crap. Children are sexual creatures from birth, in fact boys play with their genitals while still in the womb. I've seen a one year old baby humping her teddy bear. My own sex life started when I was three. No, I wasn't molested by an adult, I decided off my own bat that all my little friends, girls and boys, had to remove their swimming togs and take turn sniffing and licking each others bottoms.
The idea was mine, but no one objected, and a good time was had by all. What happens to children is that their sexuality is repressed, it's smacked out of them. Due to our cultural conditioning, parents are so embarrassed by childhood sexuality that they feel compelled to put a stop to it. What would the rellies, friends and neighbors think if Caroline openly played with her vagina in public? They would be shocked and horrified. So we must terminate such natural behaviour at all costs.
We were stopped by our parents, who were stopped their parents, and therefore we must stop our own children. Stands to reason, if kids have been slapped around for a particular 'crime' for long enough, it must be the correct response. And yet, where's the harm? There is none. Only in our brainwashed minds is there harm. So we will keep on smacking our children until they learn not to touch themselves "down there."
Immense psychological harm is done, but no matter. The important thing is that we, as parents, are not embarrassed. It's way past time this subject was aired and a torch shone in dark corners.
I once heard of a Swedish community which openly practiced incest. When the children woke up in the middle of the night, crying for no apparent reason, instead of shaking them, thumping them, picking them up by the feet and smashing their heads against a brick wall, parents would lick and kiss their genitals.
Shock horror, bad enough to give the child brain damage by shaking it almost to death, but licking its genitals... outrageous! According to almost everyone on this planet, the genital area of the body is off limits. God created 98% of the body but the devil created the genitals. We can kiss a child's face, arms, hands, neck, chest, back, legs, feet, buttocks even, but woe betide anyone who kisses the devil's area!
I mean, goodness me, the child might enjoy it!!!!!
Beating a child with a rod is cool because it's called "discipline." Touching a child lovingly on the genitals is an atrocity because it's called "molestation." The name makes all the difference. What happens if we play word games and we change things around? How about we call discipline "abuse," and molestation "fun"? Whoa, watch it Dougie, you'll get your brains blown out!
I've seen photos of naked children posing provocatively and there isn't a man alive who wouldn't be aroused sexually by these photos. Some might be shocked and disturbed by their own response, and they might feel guilty, but aroused they would be. I'm not talking here about child pornography, I'm talking about the sort of photos taken by David Hamilton, but just a shade more revealing.
The main reason men say things like, "Cut off their balls," and "Blow out their brains." is to convince those listening that they have never in their lives had an erotic thought about an under-aged person. I can't speak for women � I know very little about women � but I can say with absolute 100% certainty that there isn't a man alive who hasn't at some time in his adult life, been momentarily aroused by a schoolgirl or a schoolboy, by a semi naked twelve year old on a beach, or on a bike, by a gymnast with those cute little bumps, her legs wide open and half an inch of fabric covering her baby slit, by his own children, by a neighbor's child, by a story he heard about a local under-aged "slut," and so on.
And what do we mean by "under-aged?" During the Victorian era in Britain the age of consent was twelve. This is the period that upstanding pillars of society refer to when they talk about "good old fashioned family values." It's when most fathers were fucking their daughters as well as the chimney sweep's slave boy and getting away with it.
"Arseholes are cheap today, cheaper than yesterday. Victorian ditty, sung to the tune of the Toreador's March from Carmen
Little boys are half-a-crown, standing up or lying down..."We, as a society are obsessed with sex, and it's no wonder when you consider that our natural sexual instincts are repressed while we're young. And it's no wonder that our natural sexual instincts become twisted and perverted. That is the obvious and unavoidable outcome of a sexually repressed childhood.
What I'm saying here is, let's cut the crap. Let's have some honest dialogue. Let's stop pretending we're something we're not, that we're holier than thou. We are normal human beings with normal human emotions and it's time we stopped burying everything for the sake of piety, propriety and bullshit.
When we face up to the truth about ourselves we will be in a better position to deal with what at the moment are insurmountable problems.