|
AN ARTICLE FROM THE AUGUST 1994 ISSUE OF QUOTE UNQUOTE
FREEZING THE MOMENT |
|||||||||||||
|
For the first time in eight years, Peter Siddell has a new exhibition. Not that he's been idle - he's been selling his work and earning praise from critics and public alike. How does he do it? "Painting has to become a habit, just like a job," he tells DENIS EDWARDS. |
|||||||||||||
|
Peter Siddell takes a practical view of art's big questions, the ones artists grapple with and agonise over. Is there any future for art? Does anyone care? Is there anyone left out there who could become a customer or collector? Questions like that. For Siddell, the answer is out on the streets, especially on Auck and's warm summer twilights. It can be seen before people close up for the evening. "You can see into the houses, and there is all that empty wall space. It's very reassuring for the future of art." He chuckles. It's a sense of humour that soaks down into his paintings. Asked by Dame Catherine Tizard to do a work for gifting to the nation, Siddell bent his back to his easel to produce one of his detailed, and eerily still, urban landscapes, a near-perfect depiction of Wellington seen from the hills above the Mount Victoria tunnel, looking down over the city, across the harbour and out to the Hutt Valley. Generations of Wellingtonians can admire the work, and mull over its title, 'Toward The Bombay Hills'. Just in case anyone happened to miss the point, Siddell lives in Auckland, and paints most of his images of that city. His droll sense of humour is hardly a recent acquisition. There is the tale of how Siddell came to be a fulltime artist. He'd been working as a foreman for an electrical company, doing an apprenticeship after being raised in a working-class family in Grey Lynn. "Dad had been a wharfie, and he'd retired shortly before the watersiders got locked out. I remember a lot of things that went on, how the media portrayed the wharfies as holding the country to ransom, which I could see was rubbish. I've been very sceptical about governments ever since. " Driving around in his electrician's van, Siddell saw school teachers leaving work at 3.30 in the afternoon. This was interesting. So was the fact they got 10 weeks' paid holiday a year. And smoko breaks during the day. "I scrubbed up and went along for an interview. I ended up being a teacher for the next 10 years." There was time to develop an interest in painting, becoming a respectable watercolourist. The first two paintings he sent into a show sold, getting warm mentions in the reviews. Gallery owner Noel Moller offered Siddell a solo show. That was the spring of 1972. This drew rave reviews. Two days later Moller was on the phone. Siddell, married to fellow artist Sylvia, with two children (Avril, now a lawyer, and Emily, a working artist), had had a sell-out show. His take would be $2000, serious money in the early 70s. "I woke up next morning and rang the headmaster and told him I didn't feel like coming in. He asked if I was sick. I said no, I didn't feel like coming in." Eventually the headmaster understood what was happening. He was the first person outside the family group to hear the wonderful news. Peter Siddell had just begun his career as a fulltime artist. He resigned, knowing there were plenty of jobs and he could always get back. That was 22 years ago. In that time he hasn't worked at anything except art, racking up a CV to weep for, with solo and group shows at every decent-sized museum or city and regional gallery, and he is a presence in any respectable commercial collection. There was the Benson and Hedges supplementary Art Award in 1978. The year before, he took the Air New Zealand Travel Award. Until he took a breather about eight years ago there was a solo show each year at a dealer gallery. In those eight years he hasn't needed to exhibit. He has been complethlg commissions, or selling his work direct from his studio. or placing work in gallery stocks, for sale from their group shows or storeroom. His work has been included in art histories. Michael Dunn, Elva Bett, Peter Cape, Hamish Keith and Gordon Brown have all given him warm reviews and noted his staking out of his own niche. In 1960 the newly-wed Siddells built themselves a house in Auckland's Blockhouse Bay. It would be home for the next 26 years. The 80s shook them loose. 'The prices I had been getting for my work had gradually been going up. Then, in the 80s, there was a real boom in prices. " That boom became a wave. The Siddells surfed down from high on Blockhouse Bay to a large, warm and oft-extended Mount Eden villa. He is a regular in the local Artists in Eden day. Artists produce a work in the morning for auction that afternoon, the proceeds going to a competition for young artists. It draws big names. It is a useful index of the market, as it bypasses the critics to reflect the preferences of those who actually ante up their readies. This year Siddell drew $3000 for what he describes as a ' minuscule pastel", For Siddell, being an artist, and a successful one, is the product of talent, rigorously serving the work rather than his ego and realising that being an artist is a job much like any other. "That means working every day whether you particularly feel like it or not. Painting has to become a habit, just like a job. Otherwise, if you sit around and think about what art really means and don't paint anything until then, you might as well become a critic." He says this with more humour and warmth than the words appear, cold on the page. "I didn't really say that. To be fair. all the people in the peripheral art world, the gallery owners, critics and academics, all do work hard, some of them very hard indeed. Or if they aren't working hard, they are taking big, big risks on setting up a gallery or something." The venom of the art world seems to have passed him by. He's never been given a bad time by the professional critics. Indeed his keenest supporters in the early days were the likes of Hamish Keith. critic and historian, and Michael Dunn, now dean of Elam. Naturally there has been robust criticism, although it has tended to be from people who don't seem to have a feel for what he is trying to do. If he senses that, he lets it float by. If there is a cloud in all of this it is one the 59-year-old has learned to live with: that no matter how hard he tries, he is never going to produce the image he dreamed of when he took up the brush to do a new work. "I've got used to it now, that the idea or the concept is wonderful, and I am finding the ideas getting better all the time, but the execution never keeps up." Behind that is a secret fear of most artists, the problem of perfection. "How can you ever produce another painting after you have produced the perfect image? You can't. There is no reason to keep painting, because you are finished. The thing about being a painter is the chase for the perfect image. If you win the hunt, you lose. If I got there, I might never paint again." So he continues the hunt, painting on, slouching towards that perfect image. To an untrained eye it is over. He is there. Siddell's work is famed for its technical perfection and cool stillness. It is a sense of quiet which can be unsettling: the paintings show how Auckland might look after a neutron bomb has landed, destroying the people, while leaving structures and buildings intact. Siddell's answer is serious, though laced with humour. He sees the strength of the paintings as being in freezing a moment and capturing an image. That done, they go up on a wall, probably never to move again. Odds are that below it or in the same room, is a television set, with images racing across, hundreds of them a minute. The idea of a painting competing for colour and movement becomes laughable. But isn't it the same with photography, freezing a moment and capturing an image? "Mmm. I'd never really thought about it that much, but I think the difference is that you can manipulate the image." This Siddell does with gusto, briskly mov ing whole suburbs around to get the composition he wants. Nowadays computers can manipulate images too, and for the same reason. Which gets us back to why people buy paintings in the first place÷because they have been touched by the hand of another human being, a talented one with a special vision. Now, for the first time in eight years, the general public is on the starting line to buy one of his paintings. He has a new exhibition this month. Siddell isn't one for the limelight: at the Artists in Eden day he preferred to head back to his studio to produce his work, unlike for instance Don Binney, who enjoys working among the chatter and energy of kibitzers. So why is Siddell going public? For a successful artist and a private man it seems masochistic. One possible answer is in the sliver of the adventurer in Siddell. Before family life put a stop to it. he was an enthusiastic mountaineer, climbing most of the better-known peaks. This is not a sport for the dilettante or the faint-hearted. That robust spark, diverted into his art, is helping push him back on stage. "You also expose yourself and your work to the critical gaze of critical analysis, and everyone is going to come along, and all that. But it's a disciphlle that I think you have to subject yourself to at times. "It is very easy, hiding away in a studio. When you have a show not only can the public have a look at the work, but you can have a look yourself at what you are doing and the way your work is going." His show, opening in Parnell's Artis Gallery, on October 11, will be a night to remember. Siddell is genuinely popular, both for his paintings and for himself. The rentacrowd agency will be idle÷ the punters won't need any coaxing to flock there. His last show, at a Remuera gallery, is still the stuff of legend, if only for the names of art world luminaries who couldn't get any closer than the footpath, much less be seen exchanging a few mots with the man himself. Siddell isn't bothered about the seeing-and-being-seen aspect of openings. Those Grey Lynn working-class influences take time to die. You get the feeling he'd probably sooner be at home, enjoying dinner and Shortland Street than poncing and posing his way around an opening, even his own. It's precisely why so many people will turn up to share the moment. He's popular because he doesn't pose and ponce. At least two of the paintings in the new show have images which are anything but still. They have light peering through tumultuous clouds, speeding across the suburbs around Dominion Road. It's forceful, elemental stuff. It' s a glimpse of what Siddell can do when the inspiration takes him. In short, it's exciting. ~Denis Edwards |
|||||||||||||
|
AN ARTICLE FROM THE JUNE 1995 ISSUE OF PACIFIC WAY FREEZING A MOMENT IN TIME At the age of 10 or 11 on the morning paper round before school, Peter Siddell walked the empty twilight streets of suburban Auck land. Darkened houses slumbered in the last quiet moments of dawn. No people, no movement, no sound. Childhood impressions resonate in his paintings: in the eerie stillness of deserted cityscapes which leave the viewer with a heightened sense of expectation÷as the young Siddell might once have wondered what secrets lay beyond those silent, curtained windows. "Memory is an important component of my painting, particularly of childhood," he says. "But I had been painting for a long time before I thought much about my own experiences. It was only when my children were about the same age that I began to remember and to see those memories reflected." Siddell has been described as one of New Zealand's leading realist painters, but a distinctly subversive element loiters behind the facade of immaculate, inner-city villas and neatly ordered streets. In the catalogue for a solo exhibition of his paintings in Auckland last year, art historian Julie Roberts noted a asurrealist displacement" in Siddell's work, which she likened to a good thriller: "It's that psychological disruption concealed by apparent normality that maintains your interest." By the absence of a human presence, Siddell freezes a moment in time. But, unlike the doc umentary approach of a photographer, he both creates and manipulates the images portrayed. "I'm not particularly interested in painting things on a superficial level," he says. "A camera does that just as well. ~ A group exhibition, The Persuasion Of The Real, featuring the work of both Peter and Sylvia Siddell, runs at the Hawke's Bay Art Museum in Napier until July 9, then tours the North Island. ~Joanna Wane A CATALOGUE ESSAY FOR A 1998 EXHIBITION FROM A DISTANCE AT ARTIS GALLERY PETER SIDDELL: FROM A DISTANCE Everywhere in light and calm the murmuring Peter Siddell has selected four sites for this exhibition- physical sites arising from John Daly-Peoples |
|||||||||||||
|
"Peter Siddell is identified with his depictions of the central areas of Auckland in a hard edged realist style. While his works appear to be records of actual places, Siddell's painting has a subjective component. Memory, association and invention play roles in his compositions. He avoids figures and narrative to keep the stillness and super-real order of his imagery, which resonates at a subconscious level.His paintings seem to be beyond normal time and to have the timelessness of vivd memory." "Nostalgia is also at the heart of Peter Siddell's immaculate representation of a city which looks like it might be Auckland but on closer inspection is revealed to be a scrambled simulacrum." "Relocation in fact has long been central to Siddell's imagery. Here an almost Mount Roskill; But on that tangent, no: there,a clocktower,Ponsonby by shape not place: then was this not Devonport - but landlocked? Rearrangements these as encountered in the impeccable illogic of the dream." "The smallest of his panoramas, simply called Isthmus, is the most magical in its extended format and unusual lighting. It is a view across Auckland at the narrowest point of the country, from coast to coast. In this instance, Siddell has given up his customary detail for a more unified view that has an imaginative, compelling dimension to it." |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|