|
"Am I as much as being seen"
-Play |
Each of these pieces, small as they
are, contains a complete world .
Each of these worlds is also in
some way post-apolcayptic. Some
apparently definitive event has occurred, but not proved terminal.
In Play, what once were humans are now inurned.
In Roughs for Theatre I, there once were women, there once
were trees, day & night in regular progression, but these have all
left, leaving a half-lighted landscape scattered with occasional tins of
baked beans. In Footfalls,
the girl once able to walk around freely now walks only along the bare
strip where we watch her pacing, revolving “it all” interminably.
In Roughs for Theatre II two spiritual accountants tally the
life of Mr C, reduced to a catatonic manikin silhouetted on the
window-ledge and waiting to jump. Our
final piece, Catastrophe, introduces the figure of the artist
tampering with the heaps of broken images that inhabit a landscape at once
psychic and political in the post-atomic age.
The challenge Beckett offers to
both actors and director is the challenge to concentrate solely on truth
and completeness of each of these worlds, without interpretation or
theatrical adornment. His pieces are in so many ways so anti-theatrical!
So lacking in plot, or precise story, or specific character and
interaction. Yet Beckett’s
instructions are very strict. It
is our business as performers to bring to life exactly the rhythms that
his inner ear has picked out, within exactly the limitations that he has
set. These limitations often infuriate – like the characters in
Beckett’s head, we experience a special kind of confinement.
And that is where the miracle of working with Beckett happens.
The miracle of a theatre that exists only in the precise moment in
which it is happening, yet within that moment, touches on the eternal.
back to top
|