The UN: A Den of Thieves
© Prakash J. Mascarenhas, 20th October, 2002.
The United Nations was set up by the Powers which prosecuted the second World War against Nazi Germany and its allies, and was intended to perpetrate their scheme of world domination and global order. The UN was and is not a democratic body.
In the beginning, States such as Spain and Portugal were coerced by the Allied Powers to join the UN. These states, under the Catholic Phalangist regimes of Dr. Salazar and Generalissimo Franco, joined because they had no other option.
In its acts, the UN has demonstrated outright, brazen and shameless hyocrisy, which demonstrates beyond the least shadow of doubt that it is a puppet of its masters - England and the USA, together with their satellites - Germany, France, Japan, etc., etc.
Thus, while neither Portugal nor Spain submitted lists of "Non-Self Governing Territories" as demanded by the UN, and England and the USA, among others did, the UN unilaterally added Portuguese and Spanish dependencies to its list.
But this is not all. When the USA, and England, conducted a mockery of the UN requirements for the "Non-Self Governing Territories" dependent on them, such as Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico, etc., the UN accepted uncritically these frauds and delisted these territories.
Yet, again, when the Indian Union acted in flagrant violation of international law to rob and occupy the EIP, the UN not only did not act against it, but has actually delisted the EIP as of 1961, as if, by the criminal acts of the IU, the legal requirements of the UN, as specified by the various resolutions governing the attitude of member-states towards the "Non-Self Governing Territories" were fulfilled in the case!
This is nothing less than shameless double standards!
But this is not all. The UN has demonstrated time and again, its lack of neutrality and its open and shameless bias towards certain states and powers.
It has failed to act against and punish the act of piracy committed by the Canadian navy against a Spanish fishing vessel in international waters.
It has failed to act against the USA for denying citizens of other states consular access when under arrest for alleged crimes in the US.
It has made itself party to the acts of terrorism and lawlessness exhibited towards Yugoslavia, Serbia, Montenegro, Krayina, the two Slavonias, the Serbs and to ex-President Slobodan Milosevic.
It has made itself a party to the charade of Bosnia, the treason of the Muslim Serbs and of Alia Izetbegovic (Ali Izzat-Baig).
It has made itself a party to the acts of naked, unwarranted aggression against sovereign Yugoslavia by the USA and by NATO, by its connivance in the deliberate targetting of civilian objectives, in the use of disproportionate force against Yugoslavia, and in the use of spent nuclear fuel - Depleted Uranium, a hazardous, radioactive, carcinogenic chemical - which use constitutes acts of nuclear and chemical warfare.
It has made itself the Sovereign Administrator of NATO & UN Occupied Bosnia and Kosovo-Mehohia, joining with the 'Bosniac' & KLA Albanian Muslim terrorists acting on the premises of the Millat Doctrine (Jinnahism).
It has made itself the patron for the kidnapping of persons and for their kangaroo trials.
It has acted in violation of all international laws and norms by imposing itself as the Sovereign Administrator of East Timor, usurping the place of Portugal, during the transition from Indonesian occupation to independence.
In all these acts, the UN demonstrates that it is an immoral and lawless body, a band of thugs and robbers, banded together in conspiracy and war, ganged up against humanity, morality and law.
UN Resolutions 1541 & 1542:
These UN Resolutions state that dependent territories have the right to free self-determination, etc., etc. However, in law and in morality, this cannot be contended, absolutely and uncritically; i.e., there cannot be a universal rule for all such territories. Each case must be considered on its own merits.
Profound Assininity!
Take a hypothetical case where an invader conquers two or more neighbouring states and unites them into a single dependent entity. From history, we know that this is not at all hypothetical, for it has been, by and large, the rule. Now, in such a dependent territory, the peoples included are usually, not by history, a single people, but historically separate and distinct communities with real and irreconcilable histories and traditions of animosity, etc., between them. Following the assinine doctrine of territorial integrity, these peoples are forced, willy-nilly to co-exist and co-habitate, with all the problems that this entails. Such a situation cannot be said to be mandated by either logic, law or morality.
In the case of the Belgian Congo, we have one such case. Yet the UN refused to countenance or tolerate the rights of the Katangese to constitute themselves into an independent state, and fought them to subvert their secession.
Colonialism, racialism, imperialism, etc. are not innate traits of or exclusvie to the white man. It is and has been practised by all men, at one time or the other. There is also internal colonialism, imperialism, etc., committed by one people on another, within a territory, whether it be a native state that has succeeded in evading the Europeans, or a European dependency. But, if we understand the UN, colonialism, racialism, imperialism, etc. was and is an innate traits of or exclusvie to the white man!
Thus, the UN has become the patron of Neo-Colonialism: The arbitary and accidental boundaries of the Colonies and Dependencies are Sacrosanct, irrespective of the histories, traditions and wishes of the distinct peoples of these territories! Thus, from the viewpoint of morality, law and logic, these resolutions are profoundly assinine!
The UN has demonstrated its partiality. It has inexplicably failed to put on the Agenda as "Colonial Territories" the Louisiana Territory, the Oregon Territory, US Occupied North Mexico (Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, California), etc. It has also inexplicably failed to list Russia's Siberian colonies, China's colonies of Inner and Outer Tibet, Manchuria, Yunnan, Hainan, Guangdong, Inner Mongolia and Uighuristan, Japan's Hokkaido (Jesso), the Indian Union's Andaman & Nicobar Islands, not to mention Jharkhand, Sudan's Kordofan, Arab North Chad's South Chad, Indonesia's Borneo, Sumatra, West Papua and Celebes, Malaysia's North Borneo, etc., etc.
The 1975 'Treaty': An Aggravated Fraud!
The UN has accepted from the Indian Union for the purpose of registry and inclusion in the corpus of international treaties, what purports to be a treaty (see here) between them and the Portuguese concerning the EIP. The treaty is extra-ordinary, being self-voiding, in that it is presumed that the EIP has been legally and constitutionally incorporated into the Indian Union, when in fact no such legal event or events have ever happened. The Indian Union presumes it's 'Constitutional' inclusion of the EIP into its territory on the premises of possession, brought about by pure and unadulterated banditry on its part.
Moreover, no such events, even if purported to have been conducted under the auspices of the Indian Union, subsequent to its acts of naked brigandery, can be recognized by the UN precisely because the UN has a specific rule governing the fate of states such as the EIP - Self-Determination, as described in Resolutions 1541 & 1542 (XV). Therefore, to take on board this treaty is for the UN to violate its own, self-prescribed rules, thus demonstrating once again its utter hypocrisy!
In signing, registring and permitting to be registered unchallenged, and by taking on record, this purported 'treaty,' Portugal, the Indian Union and the United Nation have committed gross and immoral acts of fraud and robbery upon the EIP and its constituents.
Next: Portugal: Acts of Ommission and Commission.