Contra-Asheesh Shah, Part IV: Termination
©Lucio Mascarenhas.
Orthopapism II/Michaelinum | Index of Articles
[See also Contra Asheesh Shah: Part I, Part II & Part III]
Dear Errol,
That was a really good rebuttal of Asheesh's nonsense!
Cheers!
Lucio
Asheesh
It�s so very kind of you to admit the crucial point of the non existence of a goan nation. I am at a loss, if nobody recognizes your alleged nation why all the commotion on the web site about invasion, legality, legitimacy etc. You are Portuguese as I accused you of. If not you would have goan passports and not as you admitted Portuguese passports.
There was no "Goan Nation". There is not. Certainly we are Portuguese, we have never denied that — except for a small number.
The "Commotion" about the criminal trespass against and into, the brigandage against and robbery of Goa — an integral part of the Greater Portuguese State — is legitimate, regardless of the question of whether Goa is an integral part of Portugal or an independent state.
That is, in morality, the legal status of a territory encroached upon without just cause [unless it is vacant territory, truly vacant as Antarctica is] is not relevant and cannot justify the encroachment.
So much is common sense. But you Indians religiously resist common sense.
[For the benefit of third parties, it needs to be specified that some Goan patriots, such as myself, recognize that Goa is an integral part of Greater Portugal, and seek to restore it — an attitude that can be described as being Portuguese Irredentism. Others see Goa as being a victim of Portuguese imperialism before the Indians invaded and inflicted their imperialism, and seek a Goa independent of both Portugal and India — a viewpoint that I too once held, but which I have realised is rooted in a deep misunderstanding of facts. In my other writings on the net, I have demonstrated why this is so, but here I devote a new page specifically to this question:
On The Doctrine Of "Nationalism" & The Concomitant Doctrine of "Anti-Colonialism", etc.
Generally speaking, Agnelo Gomes & Errol Rodrigues represent this second attitude.]
As for the rest of your note, firstly you have a publicly available website that is filled with falsehoods. Either remove the falsehoods or its public access. If not, you invite the ridicule that you currently suffer.
Eat out your heart, o noble Arya Srimanji! Our websites will remain!
It is touching — this pathetic, plaintive begging by you Indians that we remove our websites and informations that expose the dark lies of your beloved India. However, we must decline.
It is a great slander that our sites are filled with falsehoods. It is you Indians who are the purveyors of falsehoods:
against Goa, of the superiority of Hinduism and of the "Indian" civilisation, etc., and we merely combat these falsehoods (
the "civilisational" and racial superiority of Hinduism and of India, as propagated by the New Age prophets, "Mahatma" Gandhi, Vivecananda, Arvinda Ghosh, Paramhansa, Chinmaya, Prabhupada, Ram-manohar Lohia and other similar vermin) by propagating the truth. We stand upon nothing but the truth, and we have proven the truth of our cause time and again.
Our websites will remain, with their public access, exposing the
Monument of Lies that is India and the Indian Union, calling it's bluff, exposing it for the dark and seedy mess of purulent lies that it is.
As for attack by adversaries such as Chetak Baliga or yourself: we are not afraid of either your attacks nor of you nor of your "great" India.
It is you Indians and you alone who are complaining about the existence of our websites. We are not complaining of your attacks. Unlike you, we are not whining. We are not afraid, because our shirts are clean and our cause is just. When an elephant passes by, it takes no notice of barking dogs. When an elephant passes by, barking dogs there must be. The passage of the elephant is
proven by the barking dogs. Your complaints, whining and assaults only confirm us in the correctness of our course. It is proof that we are declaring and propagandizing the truth. If it were not the truth, you could afford to ignore it.
It is you Indians who are irked by the existence of our websites, and who cannot bear to have them remain in existence. This is because they expose the foul
Monument of Lies that is your India.
For the rest of your note, well where do I start. First I was a Hindu, and Indian educated. Now I am a bad Catholic of doubtful parentage.
I do not know where I have stated that you are "a bad Catholic of doubtful parentage." Certainly, I have questioned your self-certification as a "practicing Roman Catholic." And I have conclusively proven to the impartial third party observer that that claim is a mere pretension and a false pretension too, so that, indulging in sentimental blackmail will not acquit you. I have challenged your claim to be a "practicing Roman Catholic" which is very far from challenging your being a "Catholic". I have been very careful not to challenge that, for the very good reason that I do not really know you, so that I cannot make any positive statements on that subject. Evidently, you do not understand language.
As for your parentage being "doubtful", I deny that I have made any such allegation. I have only pointed out that, given the known facts about you, it is
probable that you are either of mixed parentage or an insincere convert.
Originally you attempted to explain the meaning of the word colony and now the English Oxford Dictionary is mistaken!
Ah, yes! Sad, is it not, this awful ignorance and blasphemy against the infallible Most Holy Oxford Dictionary? And what are you going to do about it? Organize a Novena of Reparation to the pained Sacred Heart of the Most Holy Oxford Dictionary? Better yet, get hold of the nearest
poojari fast, break out a coconut in reparation to
Sri Oxford Dictionary-eeswaraji and waving your Aarti thali, ornamented with flowers and lit
ghee lamps, and ringing your bell, piously beseech said
Sri Oxford Dictionary-eeswaraji for forgiveness of said blasphemy and sacrilege.
[While you are at, do not forget to photograph and send to me this ceremony of reparation, this
Sri Oxford Dictionary-eeswaraji ki Aarati, as it is my hobby to collect pictures and info on the doings of weirdoes and kooks.]
You even attempt to justify the systematic genocide committed against Roman Catholicises in East Timor.
Pray, what is a "Catholicises"? And pray, when did I justify "systematic genocide" in East Timor against anybody, in our exchanges?
When it is pointed out that neither the World Court nor the UN concur with any of your claims or those on the web site, they are all now Anti Christian. I must tell four of the members of the Security Council, Americans, British, French and Russian governments- all Christian who probably do not know.
I have been teaching, on my website, and to my personal friends, since long, that the UN and the World Court, etc., — the present, Protestant-Jewish-Freemasonic generated West, which has been established as a negation of Christendom, is anti-Catholic — as anyone who is familiar with me will witness to. But what is the factual basis to your
pretension that I have begun
merely now, when confronted by you with this allegation of supposed World Court, UN, etc., unfriendliness towards the Goan cause, to teach that they are anti-Christian?
Russia, as a founding member of the UN, was Communist. It is only recently that Russia has thrown away, in a fashion, Communism, but that does not mean that it has returned to its religious beliefs that it held previous to the Communist Revolution. Again, what was Czarist Russia? A Byzantine, Photianist state — which, according to Catholicism, is both heretical and schismatical. It certainly persecuted Catholicism and Catholics with great vigour.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain was fabricated by the merger of Protestant England and Protestant Scotland after the Protestant usurpers and rebels had overthrown and exterminated their Catholic governments. In Protestant England, Catholics have been browbeaten and largely exterminated in a deliberate policy of Genocide. Catholics are "constitutionally" excluded from executive offices, and if the Protestant "king" or heir marries a Catholic, she/he loses rights to "succession". Ever since the spurious "Glorious Revolution" of the Protestant traitors that usurped the throne from James II Stewart and supplanted him first with the apostate and renegade House of Orange (
the Governors / Stadtholders who betrayed the Netherlands to the Protestants) and latter with the present ruling dynasty, the apostate and renegade House of Hanover (
descendants of the eminently Catholic Queen St. Margaret of Hungary), Catholics who have had the misfortune to be ruled by apostate England have been browbeaten and re-doctrinated into a
"Slave Catholicism" that is taught to unconsciously glorify the protestant heritage of the apostate Anglo-Saxons, and to be "loyal", like Uncle Tom — in England and the "British Commonwealth", as much as in the USA. That remains the ruling dispensation, in England and by and large in the "British Commonwealth" also, ever since.
That holds true of the Indian Union also. The "animus" of India has no direct sequential descent from the prior Indian animuses, but has been fabricated by the English apostates, who are the true fathers of the modern, contemporary India and of the spiritual and ideological Indianism of the Indian National Congress, Gokhale, Tilak, Gandhi, etc., the Indianism of the "Indian Nationalist" — an animal invented by the English by fusing the lingering superstitions of the Indian pagans with the new superstitions of the apostate WASPs. The Hindus, being indoctrinated in the new ideology, which is an extension of the world-wide Jewish Agenda of bringing about the Reign of their to-be Maschiah, have been set "free" to pursue and complete that Agenda in their neighbourhood.
The USA was spawned from the UK. However, it is formally a secular state, and not a Christian state. It allows for freedom of religious belief to all without question, even Satanists like
Alistair Crowley, who could legally incorporate himself as the Satanist Church of the USA.
At its best, the USA is a Freemasonic, Deist state, which pretends to an eclectic ecumenism. At its worst, it is the United States of Soddom, the New Babylon — champion and reliever of heresy, free thought, free sex, homosexuality, paederasty and abortion; the Great Harlot — Satan's Bride — taking over from its mother, Protestant England — the United Kingdom of Gommorrah; patterned, not on Christianized, Catholic, Papal Rome, but on the pre-Christian, pagan Rome.
France has been, since the French Revolution, publicly an anti-Catholic, Freemasonic state, even though there have been occasional moderations of its anti-Catholicism. France! France! Persecutor of Popes! Murderer of saints! Betrayer of martyrs! Who has cast out the Living God — Christ Jesus, and supplanted Him and His Holy Mother with the Whore "Goddess of Reason"!
It is of these states that you allege that they are Christian states!
The last truly Christian states, which incorporated Christianity as a legal, constitutional requirement, were undermined and destroyed by the apostate Antichurch following the Robber Council of Vatican II, specifically the "Pastoral Constitution on Religious Liberty."
You are such a clever man, probably a part time brain surgeon and space shuttle pilot as well with the most complete understanding of the English language, history geograpth etc etc etc .... but sadly with no legitimate passport or country... How come ?
Brain surgeon and astronaut? No. Rather, I have the seemingly thankless job of driving back and keeping you from breaking into the Garden of my Lord and rooting up the souls He has planted therein...
But you have me foxed: I do not know "how I come"! But, "great" as my accomplishments may seem, my dear Asheesh, they are infinitesimal as compared to the fantastic greatness that is truly yours! What can I say in the presence of so great a genius, but: "I am not worthy of thine company"?
[RE: The False Prophet — "Mahatma" Gandhi]
He had both a country and a passport !
Yes, indeed, he did — and one that, for all his much-vaunted greatness — and powers of resitance — he could not prevent from dismemberment! What a disgrace! No wonder the Indian of today near universally holds him to ridicule — and bad-words him!
Yes, too, he held a passport — a British India passport which identified him as a
"subject of His Majesty, the King of England", in his capacity of "Emperor of India"*.
And your point was?
Unlike Gandhi and the Congresswalas, noted both for their bragging and for being effeminates, the Germans resolutely refused to countenance the legitimacy of the partition of Germany, thus paving the way for its eventual reunion.
Abraham Lincoln fought a war to
prevent the Partition of the USA — and
won!
Even your much-vaunted "Sardar" Vallabh Patel did not have the gumption to try anything like that: he, Nehru, Menon, Lohia, etc., could only terrorise such militarily weak powers as Hyderabad, Junagadh, Travancore, the Khasi States, Goa, etc.
Talk of reunification to a Hindu and he will break into a sweat at the prospect of so many
landyas becoming part of his beloved Hindu India! (
I know! I did!)
Reunion! Rather he wants to witch-hunt and expel the
gazillions of Bangladeshi Muslims who have allegedly flooded his beloved Hindu Rashtra!
Lucio Mascarenhas, Bombay, India.
*
Gandhi was assassinated in January 1948; the Indian Union became a Republic on 26th January 1950. Until then, it remained a Dominion of the British Commonwealth, under a Governor-General — Louis von Battenberg followed by Raja-gopala-acharya ("Rajaji"), of the Justice Party, and formerly the Prime Minister of the Madras Presidency — and as a Dominion, the "king" / "queen" of England remained the "Emperor of India" (Kaiser-e-Hind). Rajaji was the only Indian with the conscience — and courage — to denounce Nehru for the Rape of Goa!
Asheesh,
You are trying to justify Invasion without a mandate from the Local people. Gunpoint politics?
The United Nations has always loudly professed the right of self-determination as a basic right.
The Charter proclaims "respect for the principles of equal rights and self-determination."
In 1955 the social commission of UNESCO declared:
"All peoples and all nations shall have the right of self-determination — namely, the right freely to determine their political, economic and cultural status."
But when anti-Communist Katanga applied for some of that self-determination, the UN suddenly ran out — or did it?
At the very time that it was denying this right to Katanga, the United Nations admitted Communist-controlled Outer Mongolia to the ranks of peace-loving nations.
It recognized Syria's independence and admitted it to the UN when it seceded from the United Arab Republic.
It did the same when Senegal broke away from the Mali Federation; Pakistan from India; Sudan from Egypt.
While the United Nations was insisting that the Congo could not function economically without Katanga, it cut up [from the Congo] an area about one tenth the size of Katanga and created two whole new nations; the Kingdom of Ruanda and the Republic of Burundi.
The unprovoked aggression against Goa, by pro-Communist Nehru of India.
All animals may be equal, but some are obviously more equal than others. The list is endless.
The United Nations' actions speak so much louder than its words that one can only wonder in amazement at the number of otherwise observant people who have fallen for all its propagandizing about human rights
Nehru's representative at the UN was frank and defiant in his statement to the General Assembly that India would have her way "Charter or no Charter; Council or no Council!"
In the Security Council, a resolution condemning India for her aggression was promptly vetoed by the Soviets; and in the General Assembly less than one third of the members (thirty-five, to be exact) were willing to go on record as opposing Nehru.
Its integrity beyond reproach ?
Errol
From: "Asheesh Shah"
Subject: RE: The False Prophet - "Mahatma" Gandhi
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:40:02 +0000
He had both a country and a passport !
From: "Asheesh Shah"
Subject: Re: Free Goa
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:38:45 +0000
It�s so very kind of you to admit the crucial point of the non existence of a goan nation. I am at a loss, if nobody recognizes your alleged nation why all the commotion on the web site about invasion, legality, legitimacy etc. You are Portuguese as I accused you of. If not you would have goan passports and not as you admitted Portuguese passports.
As for the rest of your note, firstly you have a publicly available website that is filled with falsehoods. Either remove the falsehoods or its public access. If not, you invite the ridicule that you currently suffer.
For the rest of your note, well where do I start. First I was a Hindu, and Indian educated. Now I am a bad Catholic of doubtful parentage. Originally you attempted to explain the meaning of the word colony and now the English Oxford Dictionary is mistaken! You even attempt to justify the systematic genocide committed against Roman Catholicises in East Timor.
When it is pointed out that neither the World Court nor the UN concur with any of your claims or those on the web site, they are all now Anti Christian. I must tell four of the members of the Security Council, Americans, British, French and Russian governments- all Christian who probably do not know.
You are such a clever man, probably a part time brain surgeon and space shuttle pilot as well with the most complete understanding of the English language, history geograpth etc etc etc .... but sadly with no legitimate passport or country.
How come ?
©Lucio Mascarenhas.
Orthopapism II/Michaelinum | Index of Articles