|
Our WTC- special
|
| The
WTC has been blown up by the CIA and the MOSSAD! An increasing number of people believes that. Within 2 months it might be almost everybody! Read more about the reasons and then judge for yourself! Distribute this text to all the people you know! Especially to those who are still willing to think! |
|
|
|
1. Because it did not collapse or tumble
down immediately A building that withstands the impact of a passenger plane filled up with fuel cannot easily collapse or tumble down |
|
| Photograph
1: Area of the plane impact, the building is heavily damaged, but does
not collapse or tumble down! |
|
2. Because most of the kerosene burns away immediately after the plane
crash A plane crashes into a building. The building is damaged and only fragments of the plane remain. Naturally there is an explosion when kerosene emerges from the ripped up tanks and ignites. This ”fireball” can be clearly seen on several photographs. However, the ”fire storm”, which is caused by the burning kerosene lasts only a couple of seconds. After that the fire is sustained by other burnable substances |
|
| Photograph
2: Fireball after the explosion of fuel in the south tower, fire in the
north tower |
|
3. Because the fire in the building did not generate high temperatures A fire generating high temperatures produces few or no smoke. A fire generating moderate temperatures produces a lot of smoke. The fire in the twin towers of the WTC has produced lots of black smoke, thus the temperature generated was relatively low! Until the collapse of the towers there was burning paper, wood and cable insulation material. Concrete and steel do not burn. Kerosene was not much left over! More over there have been survivors of the catastrophe who managed to go down the stairs past the impact area and the fire! |
|
| Photograph
3: Long black smoke plume means low fire temperatures |
|
4. Because steel girders yield only under the influence of high temperatures
and because incandescent steel girders emit light steel is no resin
. In order to lower its strength several hundred degree Celsius are necessary.
It has been said that the ”hell´s fire” has generated temperatures
of more than 1000 or 1100 degree Celsius. At such high temperatures steel
is incandescent and that means that the emitted light is clearly visible.
Glowing steel girders can be identified as such even at daylight. There
is no photograph of the catastrophe which shows incandescent steel girders,
whether as part of the building structure or as part of the debris! |
|
| Photograph
4: No incandescent but slightly rusty steel girders fall on the street
|
|
5. Because the Twin Towers collapsed in a too perfect way Both towers were damaged on one side with steel girders that were cut through or otherwise damaged. Why did the top of the buildings not turn over or buckle? Every tree will fall into the direction of the notch which has been cut either with a saw or an axe! And if really the heat generated by the fire which was nourished by the kerosene softened the steel girders, then how could somebody manage to distribute the kerosene on all of the floor area in such a perfect way, because this would be the prerequisite for the steel girders to crumble at exactly the same moment of time! |
|
| Photograph
5: The result of the destruction is a building that collapses without tumbling
in a perfect, ”telescopic” way. How is that ever possible? |
|
6. Because the destruction of the Twin Towers starts with an explosion The final destruction of the WTC-towers starts with an explosion and not with yielding steel girders. This is clearly visible on several photographs. After 45 min or 1 hour after the plane crash, from where can the explosion come? No explosion without explosives, and the kerosene has burned off long ago or has penetrated lower floors! |
|
| Photograph
6: Who can do the miracle of distributing a burnable liquid fuel in a perfectly
homogeneous way with the help a crashed airplane in a building structures
with dividing walls and lift shafts? |
|
7. Because the debris falling on the ground is not deformed The steel debris falling off the WTC-towers is not deformed! The steel structures falling on the ground are nicely cut and regularly shaped. The form and the size of the steel debris cannot be the result of chance! Everything hints at a controlled blow-up of the building! |
|
| Photograph
7: An big explosion in the upper area of each WTC-tower is the beginning
of the total destruction |
|
8. Because igniting explosives on the outer structure emit light and hint
at a controlled blow-up of the building From the top down to the bottom of the building several photographs show emissions of light. Sometimes 2 light spots form a line that is tilted 45° versus the horizontal line! Everything hints at a controlled blow-up of the building! |
|
| Photograph
8: Clean cut areas of the outer building structure fall on the street |
|
9. Because the steel debris of the WTC is formed in a too regular way That which remains from the WTC-towers at ”ground zero” is shaped in a too regular way. There are always clean cut units of three steel girders. More over that the remains of the WTC-front form a line which is tilted 45°. Random debris of a collapsed building would look different. Everything hints at a controlled blow-up of the building! |
|
| Photograph
9: The light spot near the edge of the tower indicates the igniting charge
of explosives |
|
| Photograph
10: The light spots on the front of the building indicate the igniting
charge of explosives |
|
| Photograph
11: The regularly shaped steel debris of the WTC-towers hint at a
controlled blow-up of the building |
|
Where you could see the photographs: Photograph 1: Bunte Extra (German magazine) ”Terrorkrieg gegen die USA”, Page 14 Photograph 2: Time ”11. September 2001”, Page 5 Photograph 3: Time ”11. September 2001”, Page 2 Photograph 4: Bunte Extra (German magazine) ”Terrorkrieg gegen die USA”, Page 26 Photograph 5: Newsweek Extra Edition ”America under Attack”, Page 15 Photograph 6: Der Spiegel (German magazine) No. 50 (2001-12-10), Page 110 Photograph 7: Der Spiegel (German magazine) No. 40 (2001-10-01), Page 31 Photograph 8: Der Spiegel (German magazine) No. 51 (2001-12-17), Page 106 Photograph 9: Der Spiegel (German magazine) No. 40 (2001-10-01), Page 31, enlarged section Photograph 10: Newsweek Extra Edition ”America under Attack”, Page 13, enlarged section Photograph 11: Newsweek Commemorative Edition ”A new America?”, Page 26 |
|
See, think for yourself and draw your conclusions! |
