english

The Pentagon And The Passenger Aircraft

On September 11th, 2001 there was no passenger air plane that crashed into the Pentagon. The relatively small damage of the Pentagon was caused by an intentionally arranged explosion and an intentionally arranged fire. The population of the whole world is cheated since then and the US-manipulated press in all countries is the willing executioner.
An increasing number of people believes that. Within 2 months it might be almost everybody!
Read more about the reasons and then judge for yourself!
Distribute this text to all the people you know! Especially to those who are still willing to think!

The 5 reasons why no passenger aircraft crashed into the Pentagon on 2001-09-11

	1. Because the damaged area is too small On the 11th of September 2001 a Boeing 757 allegedly crashed into the Pentagon. The Pentagon has a height of 21.6 meters and it can thus be understood that the width of the damaged location can in no case be more than 30 meters. On the other hand the Boeing 757 equipped with 2 jet engines has a wing span of more than 40 meters. This does not fit together! Photograph 1: Location of the alleged plane crash. With a height of the Pentagon of 21,6 meters, the width of the damaged spot cannot be more than 30 meters!
	2. Because the damaged area is too clean cut on the left side The damaged wing of the Pentagon looks as if somebody had cut away the ceilings with a huge circular saw. How could a crashing plane ever cause such kind of a damage? Photograph 2: Alleged impact area, the left side looks a little bit too clean cut!
	3. Because the next row of buildings is not damaged mechanically The Pentagon is a pentagonal building with 5 concentric rows of building wings. If a passenger airplane with more than 100 tons weight crashes into the outer row at high speed and devastates it, then how do you explain that the succeeding row is not damaged mechanically, although the distance between the rows is only a couple of meters? Photograph 3: Alleged impact area, the succeeding row is not damaged mechanically
	4. Because there are no fragments of the plane An airplane crashes on the ground. The metallic fragments can be put together in order to trace back the reasons for the plane crash. Plastics, rubber and textiles may burn away (almost) without leaving traces. The metallic fragments should be visible in any case. Where are the fragments of the passenger airplane with 2 jet engines? Where are the wings, the fuselage, the 2 jet engines? Photograph 4: Alleged impact area, where are the fragments of the passenger aircraft?
	5. Because there are no photographs showing the actual crash When passenger airplanes crashed into the towers of the World Trade Center that event was recorded with photo- and video cameras in many variations and from many different angles and view points. Now, why did we not see A SINGLE photograph or video tape showing the plane that is on his way to the Pentagon? The Pentagon is a famous building close to a big city. At least a couple of pedestrians, tourists or reporters should have been present who would have found an aircraft flying extremely low somewhat peculiar! So, everything that we could see in the press were “schematic views” of the crash, is not this a little strange? Photograph 5: Only a schematic view of the plane crash, why no real pictures?

Where you could find these pictures:

Photograph 1: Newsweek Commemorative Edition ”A new America?“, Page 34 - 35
Photograph 2: Geo Epoche Nr. 7: “Der 11. September 2001“ (German magazine), Page 69
Photograph 3: Bild Buch “Das Jahr 2001“ , Ullstein edition, Page 155
Photograph 4: Newsweek Extra Edition „America under Attack“, Page 26 - 27
Photograph 5: Geo Epoche Nr. 7: “Der 11. September 2001“ (German magazine), Page 70

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws