This subject is about the use of nude minors in mainstream Hollywood movies.� Since the sixties- the late sixties to be exact there has been a demand for nude children in the media.� The argument was that it shouldn't be a big deal for child actors to do nude scenes in movies as long as there is no frontal nudity (bare-bottoms only). Skinny-dipping for example is an innocent act that shouldn't be considered pornography.
I will give you an example of that type of scene; The scene in question showed about five naked boys skinny-dipping while in the background three girls spied on them and poked fun at one of the boys' genitals.� As the scene progressed the boys became embarrassed as the girls showed up at the pond.� As the scene progressed they decided to steal their underwear and led them on a nude stampede across an open-field.� Everybody in the theater found it hysterical.
So piutywrec what is your point?� Why are you bothered by that scene?� Well if you thought that that scene was funny then you really didn't analyze the problems with it in detail.
Before we analyze that scene in detail let's talk about sexual abuse.� Now most people have completely narrowed down sexual abuse to physical contact.� The fact of the matter is that sexual abuse involves a lot more than just penetration and fondling; it can involve how one talks and acts towards a child.� Let's look at the different ways that a child can be sexually abused;
1)� Penetrating a child oraly, analy or missionary style (obviously)
2)� Feeling the child's erogenous zones� or having the child fondle the offender.
3)� Calling a child lewd and vulgar names especially in such a way that pokes fun at his or sexuality;� calling a child a faggot, whore, motherfucker or dike for example is sexual abuse.� (You see most people don't know this but it's the professionals who have to deal with these individuals who have been abused this way.� They see first hand how this can seriously affect somebody sexually.)
4)� Poking fun at a child's sexual development (genital size etc.)
5)� Photographing children for sexual purposes.� Now take note; photographing your child having his or her first� bath or exploring the house nude is not sexual abuse.� The key word here is "intent".� We are talking about erotica and sexually explicit photographs here.
6)� Showing a child pornography or adult erotica
7)� Stripping a child to hit or spank bare-bottom.� (You see a lot of people don't know this either.� A person's bare-bottom is filled to the brim with sensitive erotic nerve endings; it's an erogenous zone which is why it's considered indecent exposure to bare ones naked bottom in
continued on page 2;
