| newly traced
from Reds: Liverpool FC first est. 25 june 1997 paths still being plotted scribed by journeymaster perrin |
![]() |
the
ongoing saga of liverpool fc
|
[ C u r r e n t aA b o d e ] [ J o u r n e y m e n ] [ J o u r n a l s df r o m dt h ed P a s t ] [ P a t h s sE l s e w h e r e ]
SEASON REVIEW 1997 / 1998|
Final
Premier League Standing For any major
football team, the judge of its success would be what it has won. Whether
fair or not, success would be always, for Liverpool FC, the yardstick
by which the club is measured. Like for Juventus and AC Milan in Italy,
Real Madrid in Spain and Bayern Munich in Germany, the glorious past
weighs heavily upon the shoulders of the present Liverpool team, to
the point that history becomes a burden of expectations which the team
struggles continually to fulfil. Beyond a source of fan adulation and
a claim to being the supreme English football club, Liverpool's 18 League
titles and the collection of European, FA and English League Cups have
played their role in undermining the team's performance and consistency.
Yet that is the way for Liverpool.
For the third
season in a row, all under the management of Liverpool old guard Roy
Evans, the Reds of Merseyside have won nothing. What they have can claim
is a third-place Premiership finish two points ahead of Chelsea but
significantly 12 behind Manchester United and a point further behind
champions Arsenal. That is somewhat better than the fourth placing of
the previous season, but at least in 1996-1997, Liverpool pushed Manchester
United for the Premiership title until their defensive slump in the
final weeks. This time around, Liverpool's title challenge, affected
by a poor league start that saw them crash at home to Leicester City,
materialised only in a brief mid-season surge and faltered soon after.
Third place
means not playing in the lucrative and prestigious European Champions
League, and the closest Liverpool came to a trophy this season was in
the Coca-Cola League Cup, where they reached the semi-finals before
disappointingly crashing out 3-2 on aggregate to First Division Middlesbrough
(d�j� vu: last season, it was Boro which knocked Liverpool out of the
League Cup too). In the UEFA Cup, the Reds were unceremoniously dumped
out in the second round by yet another French side Strasbourg (d�j�
vu: last season, it was Paris St. Germain) on the same aggregate score,
their furious 2-0 fightback at Anfield in the return leg again not quite
enough to overturn the first-leg deficit and some atrocious defending.
And this after edging out Glasgow Celtic in the much-publicised "Battle
of Britain". In the FA Cup, Liverpool's involvement was swiftly terminated
in their first round of competition, a shocking 3-1 defeat at home to
Coventry City.
So now the
League title has dramatically gone the way of Arsenal. Chelsea are the
holders of the League Cup, have finished fourth in the Premiership,
and covert the Cup Winners' Cup as well. The Gunners and Newcastle United
would soon contest the FA Cup final. Liverpool's scant consolation lies
in how bitter rival Manchester United have won nothing this season as
well, including a demoralising failure in the Champions' Cup competition,
and in how the Reds are the only Premiership side to achieve the double
over Arsenal, having won 1-0 at Highbury and emphatically 4-0 at Anfield
in their penultimate game (and perhaps in how they have beaten Newcastle
United thrice this season). What else have they achieved?
In a name:
Michael Owen. The 18-year-old striking revelation has fulfilled the
pre-season predictions of soccer pundits to catapult himself into Merseyside
fame. He has been Liverpool's chief striker throughout the season, where
seasoned campaigners Robbie Fowler and the newly-signed German international
Karlheinz Riedle have been hit by the loss of form, injury and suspension.
Owen has struck 23 goals in his first full season for the Reds, 18 of
them in the Premiership (including a point-saving hat-trick at Hillsborough),
level with Dion Dublin of Coventry City and Chris Sutton of Blackburn
Rovers, ahead of the main England striker Alan Shearer and ahead of
Arsenal's brilliant Dutchman Dennis Bergkamp.
Owen has been
voted into third place in the PFA Footballer of the Year Award by fellow
professionals and football critics (Bergkamp has won it), and won the
PFA Young Player of the Year Award. He has made England footballing
history by becoming the youngest England cap this century when he was
selected by England coach Glenn Hoddle, and made his international debut
in England's 2-0 Wembley defeat by Chile. The teenage sensation is set
to go to France for the World Cup finals in June, and may partner Shearer
in attack if Teddy Sheringham loses his form (chances are Owen would
be used as a substitute). One wonders what might have been if Fowler
had been fit alongside Owen throughout the season. The homegrown Liverpool
talent, whose electrifying pace was evident in his equaliser against
Manchester United at Old Trafford and who contributes significantly
to attack beyond scoring with his pace and workrate, is one of the reasons
for sustaining optimism about Liverpool for the next campaign.
After Owen,
the next excellent Liverpool player is the enigmatic Steve McManaman,
who has surpassed himself with 12 goals this season. The appraisal of
Macca's performance is however complicated somewhat by his unwillingness
to sign a long-termed contract at Anfield; his present one runs out
at the end of next season, after which he could leave Merseyside as
a free agent under the Bosman ruling. Liverpool's anguish at that scenario
has prompted them to accept, before the start of the season, a 12m pound
offer from Barcelona; although the deal fell through, speculation about
Macca's future has continued unabated throughout the season. It may
be that Macca is feeling the strain of not winning anything at Liverpool
since his brilliant brace brought the League Cup to Anfield in Evans'
first full season in charge. He may seek a Continental club more likely
to win trophies and not having to break an era of domination by a rival
club.
In a footballing
sense, however, Macca's contribution has been outstanding after a somewhat
subdued one the previous season. Creating goals for others is what he
has always done, but this season, Macca has scored some great goals
as well, the decisive last-gasp equaliser that knocked out Glasgow Celtic,
his winner at Arsenal and his brilliant double against Newcastle come
quickly to mind. The pacy and powerful England winger, still unconfirmed
in Hoddle's England setup, has missed only two matches this season for
Liverpool (against West Ham and Derby County) and has impressed with
his commitment, defensive responsibility and leadership qualities, as
he showed when he took over from Paul Ince as caretaker captain when
the Guv'nor was suspended. Liverpool fans adore Macca, although certain
football experts believe that Macca's individualistic play hurts Liverpool's
team and possession-oriented football. What I believe is that Macca,
like Zinedine Zidane or Ryan Giggs, possesses that rare, mercurial and
irreplaceable quality that allows the team to conjure a chance out of
nothing or carve through tight defenses. It would hurt Liverpool, and
not just emotionally, if he were to go.
The England
hard-man was brought from Inter Milan in the pre-season to bolster a
supposedly talented but steelless Liverpool midfield. It is controversial
whether the Guv'nor has done that. He has had some great games, such
as in the thrilling draw at Tottenham, and he has provided scoring support
for Liverpool's decimated frontline with eight goals. But in truth,
Ince's presence and captaincy have not stabilised the team, which, more
for defensive shortcomings perhaps, has been shakier in away games than
in the last season. Ince has never been a talented playmaker, but he
has also not been the lynchpin in midfield he was supposed to be.
I think John
Barnes was unfairly made the scapegoat last season for Liverpool's defensiveness:
his poise and experience were invaluable in holding and distributing
the ball for Liverpool. I continue to maintain that it was Roy Evans'
tactic of playing two ball-holders - Barnes and Michael Thomas, in midfield
which contributed to Liverpool's over-reliance on the forwards. I am
not dismissing Ince's potential influence - remember he took a season
to settle in Italy before he became a real favourite of the San Siro
crowds? He seemed to have been more effective this season with Jamie
Redknapp alongside him, one ball-winner and the other a great playmaker
in the making. But Redknapp has been too injury-plagued this season
to forge any kind of sustained midfield partnership with Ince - certainly
Ince alone cannot provide the steel for Liverpool if the problems in
defence remain.
Oyvind Leonhardsen,
signed from Wimbledon, is set to become Liverpool's unsung hero if Evans
sticks with the Norwegian next season in midfield. He missed the first
third of the season through a persistent injury, but has since featured
regularly in the starting line-up. Fit, hardworking and quietly effective,
Leonhardsen has managed six goals, and goalscoring had never been a
problem for him at Wimbledon. He may not have been as effective for
Liverpool playing on the left of midfield where his preferred position
for the Dons and for Norway is in the center. He has been criticised
by fans when Liverpool do not play well, but that is because he is not
a glamorous player who stands out. He is part of Evans' plan to introduce
a greater attacking and goalscoring threat in Liverpool's midfield along
with Ince, and I think he has done well so far.
Karlheinz
Riedle, signed from Borussia Dortmund, has not had the Jurgen Klinsmann
impact he was hoping for. His haul of seven goals is commendable given
his luck with injuries and sequence out of the first-team squad. He
has not been able to hold down a regular place and certainly not provided
the aerial threat or been the powerful centre-forward which Evans thought
would complement his pacy but small-sized strikers, Fowler or Owen.
Danny Murphy,
signed from Crewe Alexandra, has been peripheral to most of Liverpool's
plans this season until his sterling display at Old Trafford as a makeshift
forward helped Liverpool to a draw. Since then, he too has not been
able to hold a regular place with the return from injury of Riedle.
But the shaven-headed youngster, talented and hardworking, could be
the next sensation on Merseyside.
Brad Friedel,
signed from Columbus Crewe, is the man who had wished so much to join
the club and finally has. He was kept out of the starting line-up by
David James for 11 games after arriving at Anfield, but has since kept
his place in goal. His first few games were disasters, where he conceded
17 goals in 8 league games, but since the 4-1 demolition by Chelsea,
he has kept two clean sheets in Liverpool best performances against
West Ham and Arsenal. He is a good, alert goalkeeper, and while David
James is excellent in stopping shots, the American No. 2 is less prone
to the lapses of concentration and howlers with crosses that ended James'
long sequence as Liverpool's first-choice goalkeeper. Friedel looks
to get a reprieve from the Department of Employment on the renewal of
his work permit even though he has not played in the mandatory three-fourths
of Liverpool's games, so he could continue in goal next season, a situation
which could hasten the departure of James from Merseyside.
In the goalkeeping
department, Evans has finally managed to create competition for places
with the signing of Friedel. The Liverpool manager lost patience with
James after his nervous performance against Everton and roped in Friedel.
Given the traditional conservatism at Anfield, it is likely that Friedel
would start as No. 1 next season. His presence in goal has however not
stabilised a leaky defence; although unspectacular (unlike James), he
has so far escaped criticism aimed mostly at Liverpool's defence, and
I do not think any genuine evaluation of Friedel is possible unless
the defence is sorted out in the close season.
Liverpool's
defence has been much-aligned this season, and much of it not unjustified.
The vulnerability at the back has tarnished some of Liverpool's great
performances away, such as in the sterling comebacks at Tottenham and
Hillsborough - a fair sign of the team's combativeness this season.
Evans has bemoaned the lack of a strong commanding presence in defence
all-season, beginning after the catastrophe at Strasbourg. Two possible
candidates have failed the test: Mark Wright, who was outstanding last
season, has been plagued by a career-threatening back problem, and not
featured at all this season, while Neil Ruddock has been out-of-favour
since his poor performances against Everton and Strasbourg during Liverpool's
disastrous early-days. The lack of height in Liverpool's defence has
been exploited this season by powerful centre-forwards like Mark Hughes,
Jurgen Klinsmann and Dion Dublin.
I think with
all the criticism aimed at the defence, credit must be given to Dominic
Matteo, another of Liverpool's young stars. Playing in the unenviable
central defender's role, the stylish Matteo has impressed with his pace
and intelligent reading of the game, and his ability to pass and distribute
the ball. He is unfortunately left-footed, and has not had a commanding
partner in defence whose power and height could complement his more
skilful approach. Phil Babb, Steve Harkness and Tore Bjorn Kvarme have
not fulfilled that role; Babb has given away some penalties and is similarly
left-footed and Harkness is more a utility player than an outstanding
defender. Kvarme was of course blamed for his infamous mistakes that
led to Liverpool's defeats at Everton and at home to Manchester United;
he has not been the reliable rock he was last season this time around.
With a tough centre-half alongside him at the back however, Matteo has
the potential to become Liverpool's homebred Frank Leboeuf.
The problems
in defence have been compounded by Evans' inability to settle his wingbacks.
On the right of defence, Jason McAteer and Rob Jones have traded spells
in the side. Neither have looked convincing. I still maintain that McAteer,
whose tireless running and fighting spirit I am a great admirer of,
should play in midfield and is out-of-position as a rightback, which
leaves a 4-4-2 formation more vulnerable defensively. Jones has been
disappointing defensively where he has featured, despite his past England
credentials and ability to go forward. On the left, the dependable Stig
Inge Bjornebye has not managed to recapture his form of last season
and has only recently regained his place. Evans has tried just about
every fit man in various positions from his large collection of defenders;
no combination has yet provided consistent cover, and he may even be
tempted to place Redknapp there as sweeper (which is what Glenn Hoddle
may have in mind for England in the future).
So the problems
in defence may be attributed to injury or the defensive quality that
Liverpool is missing. It is also true, though less than evident, that
Evans' decision to abandon the oft-criticised 3-5-2 system in favour
of the conventional 4-4-2 early in the season has left the defense more
vulnerable. Player-wise, an ideal 4-4-2 Liverpool midfield would have
Ince, Redknapp, Leonhardsen and Macca playing in front of a flat back
four, instead of the five midfielders (two of whom are actually wingbacks)
in a 3-5-2 system. In a 4-4-2 formation, the four midfielders would
provide more thrust going forward but this could reduce the defensive
cover as a result. In the previous season, defence was less a problem,
but this time, with Wright injured and the formation shift, Evans has
had to deal with an unforeseen consequence of his tactical switch, hence
his search for a new type of defender.
While Liverpool's
defence has clearly been inconsistent because of the tactical switch
(despite the rare concerted effort at Arsenal and Manchester United),
it is unclear whether the reformalised midfield has been more coherent
in practice. The ideal combination would be Ince and Redknapp in the
centre, with Macca roaming free and Leonhardsen on the right. It is
a good plan, hinted at by the promising statistic that this midfield
has scored 31 goals this season, whereas Owen, Fowler and Riedle have
had 43 between them. This goes some way towards fulfilling Evans' plan
to have a greater midfield involvement in and contribution to Liverpool's
attacks.
The problem
is the execution of the plan, with Redknapp so hampered by injury this
season. Taking his place typically is Jamie Carragher, a promising youngster
who nonetheless is more a destructive player like Ince. Here we see
some sort of parallel with last season's midfield problems: Barnes and
Thomas were too defensive-minded in holding the ball and passing it
sideways or backwards instead of forward. Ince and Carragher are similarly
not offensively-inclined, but the difference here is that they are ball-winners,
not ball-holders, which explains why Liverpool's midfield has not been
the pillar of the team this season particularly in away games, and has
often buckled under pressure as a result. Not wonder Evans has bemoaned
that defending is a team effort, not just the responsibility of the
defence.
In place of
Carragher, Evans could have used players more comfortable with the ball.
But he has apparently lost interest in Michael Thomas, while the talented
Murphy or David Thompson have only recently and sporadically featured
in his plans. Patrik Berger has been an liability all season to Liverpool
with his sole bright spark in his hat-trick against Chelsea; he has
never settled at Anfield and I think Liverpool should release him. Evans'
reluctance to place a more attack-oriented player alongside Ince in
the absence of Redknapp goes back to his desire to buffer up a leaky
defence with a hardier defence. He fails, I believe, to see that is
not the solution, because he is missing a capable holder and passer
of the ball in the centre of the park, the key to stability in the squad.
With Redknapp fit, Liverpool's midfield is sound and Evans has got his
buying right the previous pre-season.
Liverpool's
strike force has been worst hit by injury this season given the lack
of cover. In fact, that has been the case since the days of Ian Rush
and John Aldridge. Owen has been the mainstay of the Liverpool attack
and his play and finishing have been astonishingly improving as the
season progressed. But how could an ambitious club depend so much on
a single teenager, no matter how talented? Fowler, the main Liverpool
striker for the past few seasons, has been dismal this term by his high
standards. He has played sporadically, grabbed 13 goals (not a bad strike
rate) and neither started nor finished the season. Despite his goals,
he has missed numerous chances and not been his usual lethal self to
the extent that he was rumoured to have balked and lost his confidence
at the meteoric rise and finishing of the younger Owen. There is so
much potential in a fit and confident Fowler-Owen combination, but keep
in mind that the pair is still very young and perhaps immature on the
field, a fact reflected by red cards collected by both players, at Bolton
and Manchester United respectively. Anyway, Fowler is set to be sidelined
with a serious knee injury until the end of the year, and Evans might
have to search for a third fit striker after Owen and Riedle.
Roy Evans
began this Premiership campaign avowing Liverpool's desire to wrest
the league title from Manchester United. While the Cup defeats against
Strasbourg and Coventry were shocking and disappointing was the semi-final
League Cup defeat by Boro, Evans knows adding to Liverpool's 18 league
titles was the fans' and management's greatest expectation. While the
Cups could be said to always throw up their share of upsets and shocks,
Premiership performance gives a better indication of Liverpool's consistency
and comparative ability throughout the season.
One major
criticism of last season's campaign was Liverpool's inability to win
their home matches, that the points dropped at the Kop not only destroyed
their title challenge but also caused them to finish a disappointing
fourth. This season, Liverpool have not been awe-inspiring at their
former fortress either: their home programme began with a disastrous
defeat by Leicester City, which revived the old doubts and signaled
Liverpool's early-season slump. In a way, the pressure of having to
perform well in front of an oft-generous, supportive but also heavily
demanding home crowd reflected Liverpool's struggle to meet the high
standards of the past. Liverpool's home form did improve after that
with some emphatic wins against Aston Villa, Chelsea and Derby County;
but if the scorelines were impressive in those matches, less so were
the actual team performances. From a larger perspective, Liverpool's
good home form at this early stage was punctuated in away matches by
defeats - by Everton and West Ham, and unconvincing performances generally.
The Reds only
hauled themselves out of this slump from late November throughout December
in the most enigmatic period of Liverpool's season. Beaten twice in
consecutive home matches by Barnsley and then 3-1 by Manchester United,
the Merseysiders managed to score an away win at Arsenal in-between
and then embark until the middle of January on a run of six victories
and one draw in seven Premiership matches, moving up to third in the
table and five points behind leaders Manchester United. A point at home
in the goalless stalemate against Blackburn Rovers (which Liverpool
ought to have won) brought them within four points. At this juncture,
a genuine assault on the League title was possible, alongside the contemplation
of a Wembley final after Liverpool took a 2-1 first-leg lead against
Boro in the League Cup semi-final.
But then everything
fell apart from there. The Reds crashed at home against Southampton,
impotent against a sturdy Saints' defence and victim to some incisive
counterattacks. Then came Liverpool's collapse in the second leg against
Boro and a sequence starting from the Southampton game of six matches
without a win until they edged out Bolton Wanderers early in March.
In January, a lacklustre Manchester United was there to be overtaken,
but the challenge of Liverpool, together with those of Blackburn and
Chelsea, fell by the wayside. United were left unscathed - at least
for a time, until Highbury rose its deadly head.
Significantly,
Liverpool have failed to mount a sustained challenge for the Premiership
title. They started off badly, recovered in time poised to make their
bid for the title, which however collapsed rapidly amid rising expectations.
After January, Liverpool were always going to be merely fighting to
finish as high as possible in the league, hopefully to qualify for the
Champions League next season. The point is that unlike last season,
home form and tactics could not be blamed for the title demise. Regardless
of the home defeat by Southampton and inability to defeat Blackburn
and Everton at Anfield, deeper causes were at work.
Last season
part of the blame was laid upon the lack of midfield support for Macca
and the strikers, and upon Liverpool's inability to break down massed
defences particularly at Anfield. This season, however, the midfield
has been more productive in front of goal, with Macca more capable of
shaking off his marker, and once Evans favoured the 4-4-2 formation,
scoring goals and creating chances even at home no longer listed as
Liverpool's chief problems. But even while Liverpool were on a run at
the end of 1997, their improvement was more apparent than real. Their
fundamental weaknesses in defence, in midfield with Redknapp out injured
and in attack with Fowler out as well, and their failure to cope with
the burden of the glorious past, were never dealt with once the temporal
Redroller had run out of steam.
One may ask
how then did Arsenal win the Premiership, stricken as they were by injuries
to and suspension of their chief strikers, Bergkamp and Ian Wright.
The answer, significantly for Liverpool, is a fantastic, proven defence
backed up by a rock solid midfield - which consisted of a ball-winner,
Patrick Vieira, a playmaker, Emmanuel Petit, and two outstanding wingers,
Marc Overmars and Ray Parlour. A fit Liverpool midfield would have the
same qualities as this Arsenal midfield, if not better, but Jamie Redknapp
was, crucially perhaps, Liverpool's missing link. And certainly the
Reds do not have the Gunners' defensive stalwarts. Liverpool are close
to getting their team right, but not quite; and anyway, any analysis
here is provisional, made on the basis of this season, which may not
be applicable for the next.
The questions
of team selection and player buying and other issues bring up the managership
of Roy Evans. No other man has been more criticised this season at Anfield
than the Gaffer, whether for his soft approach to his players, his lack
of tactical foresight or his conservative adherence to Liverpool's traditional
possession-oriented game in an age of football which relies on solid
defence, and pace and power in counterattacks. Liverpool's attacking
ability, for the past few seasons, has never been in question, or the
flair and ball-playing ability of the squad members. But in a footballing
sense, they are getting out of touch with their possession football,
since football now occurs more in decisive and explosive moments and
less over 90 minutes - a point illustrated by Liverpool's inability
to cope with the fast-attacking French clubs over two seasons in Europe.
I am not saying that having more goalscoring chances over 90 minutes
is not important to winning a match, but that possession football only
provides territorial domination, not necessarily chances to score. In
a way, Liverpool are moving gradually towards faster counterattacking
football, as Owen and Macca have shown this season with their pace,
although the rest of the squad is unfortunately slower. But Liverpool
are still lacking in the other half of the equation: defence.
As for Evans
himself, given what Ruud Gullit, Gianluca Vialli and Arsene Wenger have
achieved in England in their short spells at their clubs, it is no wonder
that many Liverpool fans are demanding a new manager and a fresh approach
to the game. I remain neutral concerning the choice of manager. Liverpool
are traditionally conservative and it appears Evans would stay one more
season and attempt a last assault on the Premiership title. But while
the old ways remain at Anfield - for good reason too, look at the abysmal
failure of Graeme Souness' short reign, the old, jealous past would
continue to loom burdensome over the shoulders of the club, and all
this while, the major clubs both in England and in Europe are steadily
strengthening and extending themselves.
|