Contemporary events, they attach it to operations against mass murderers, using so conveniently full imagination on Israel's military machines, since there is no footage available of 'Palestinian' genocide bombers in the street/bus/cafe/market/wedding-hall etc. before the atrocity act, they have it easy to portray Israel with the 'Tanks on TV', as the aggressor, never mind that Israel does NOT use them against unarmed civilians, but the damage of the illustration of 'Goliath' is already there, from there, the way is open to their now ready & ONLY now use of term "terror".

 

Let's reiterate the known: only Arab Muslim "Palestinians" aim at the unarmed civilians, you can't argue with the facts.

 

Name calling won't change a darn thing, same as calling Bush a 'Hitler' does not shock anyone, being quite used to the type of "Palestinian" name calling & silly never matching comparisons-words games.

 

Does the harsh fact -- of Arab Muslim radicals championship in terror -- drive them to attach 'dramatic' labels on unmatched items?

 

Then you have their favorite word: "massacres", they even made up a "list" of supposedly called "massacres", that other than instilling hate in the young growing up average gullible Muslim mind, it does not accomplish anything, lately they got tired a bit after the exposure of the lies on Jenin.

 

When does a fight between two armed parties become a "massacre"?

 

Only the Arab continuing massacres on the unarmed is exactly that.