EXPURGE IBRANYI!
RICHARD IBRANYI is a breathtakingly brazen liar. But, even more, he is a hypocrite and an egomaniac.
He repeats his fave mantras, "Before you inquire, blame no man; and when you have inquired, reprove justly" (Ecclus 11.7), and �Before judgment, prepares justice and learn before thy speak.� (Eclcus. 18:19), almost mechanically. And yet he has no compunction whatever in violating the very spirit of these his mantras, by making the most wild assumptions and allegations about perfect strangers - people about whom he knows absolutely nothing, with whom he is in no way acquainted, arrogating to himself Godlike omniscience.
He did this when he boldly accused me of distorting Catholic doctrines to favor some Hindu, Buddhist and Protestant relatives, although, in fact, I have none.
Not only has he attacked my family without any provocation or just cause whatsoever, his attack is extremely vituperative and intemperate.
This is an outrage.
Ibranyi is not personally acquainted with either me or my family, yet he boldly comes forward to make wild assumptions about me and my family.
In doing so, he insults my family, especially the memories of my departed family members.
But it is perhaps the Feeneyite idea of sport, their idea of entertainment to assault and insult perfect strangers.
Ibranyi has no business with my family members, leave alone insulting them.
He acts like a man who boldly intrudes into a stranger's home, and pointing out the portraits of his family members, mocks one and ridicules another.
Ibranyi has done exactly that with me, and this is absolutely intolerable.
I can understand a strange dog taking his ease on my lawn, but not a strange man taking the same liberties.
By his manner, Ibranyi demonstrates hypocrisy and egomania, and more, demonstrates a radical corruption or foulness in his soul, the stench of which emanates from his mouth and in his writings.
He is, therefore, not only a shameless liar, hypocrite and egomaniac, but also a rabid malinger, malefactor, calumniator, slanderer and a libeller.
He shamelessly burkes Catholic Doctrine, and accuses the people who adhere to the integral and sempiternal faith, rejecting the Feeneyite heresy, of being heretics!
But not satisfied with this wilful grossness, this bestial and depraved monster advances like a shameless brass faced hussy to harangue and slander an elder and Supreme Governor of the Community of the Faith, the illustrious and venerable Eugene Pacelli, Pope Pius 12 of happy memory, 1 equating him with the Baal Roncalli and his high priests Montini and Wojtyla.
What kind of monster is this Ibranyi?
As Luther had his Melancthon, Calvin his Beza, so, it seems, has Feeney his Ibranyi - the Devil's sidekick, chief adept and lieutenant heresiarch!
Well it would have been if his mother had, instead of giving him suck, bound a millstone around his neck and cast him into the nearest sewer!
O blessed and signal act of piety! that if but had been done, would have rid this burdened earth of this suppurating pest, this ravening heretic wolf!
Catholics have their work cut out in keeping this moral leper and unreformed heretic at barge-pole length!
Feeney and his brood have erred in their conceit and pride and departed from the Catholic Truth, and to justify themselves they shamelessly burke Catholic Doctrine to produce a caricature according to their own image and likeness.
They force the Catholic Faith into the procrustean bed of Feeneyism and cut something here, stretch something there and present the result to the Catholics as being the authentic faith.
The Feeneyites invite, exhort and command the Catholics to prostrate themselves before and make reparations to the sacred heart of Leonard Feeney and to abjure Catholicism that they may be saved.
For rejecting their heresy, they lump us with the Modernists. But in fact, the Feeneyites and Modernists are opposite extremes of error, with the Catholic Truth in the center. The Feeneyites have indeed ganged up with the Modernists against the Catholics, an unholy alliance of robbers and thieves.
Therefore, for good reason did Peter drive this Feeney and his vile brood out of the sheepfold into the wilderness without. But now this Ibranyi, seeks to cast himself upon me, to devor my soul. Therefore, do I, but re-iterating the full authority of the Triumphant Christ and His Invincible Church, repel him and brand him with the monitory triple accursements - Anathema sit! Anathema sit! Anathema sit!
Amen! Expurge Ibranyi!
Prakash John Mascarenhas, Bombay, India. 4th July 2001.
Notes
1. "Under the very liberal and unvigilant Pope Pius XII, who was the legitimate pope who paved the way for the Great Apostacy and was just as evil as the antipopes of the Conciliar Church because he was much more deceptive and careful in not falling into manifest heresy." Ibranyi in his magazine, "Exurge Michael", no. 2, May 2000.
2. Ibranyi sent me an attachment with this note, "Attached is a file with list the popes and their teachings on the dogma �No salvation outside the Catholic Church� and not one of them taught there is an exception for those who are invincibly ignorant to be saved by a so-called implicit faith. That is the true interpretation of the dogma, and there can be no other."
However, upon perusing his this file, I found only a collection of quotations reiterating the maxim, "Extra Ecclesia Nula Salus" - Outside the Church No Salvation. None of these quotes contradicted the Church's doctrine of the baptisms of desire and blood.
It is a mark of Ibranyi's dishonesty that, in this list, he merely ennumerates the Council of Trent, without quoting it, for in fact, if he quoted it, it would have contradicted his heresy.
In fact, Ibranyi goes on to claim that "this heretical doctrine (the baptisms of blood and desire) has not been taught by any recognized Catholic from Peter to Pius IX and it has not been taught even by Pius IX. It has never been taught by tradition in any way. As a matter of fact, the Solemn Magisterium has condemned this heresy time and again." About his list given above, he goes on to ask, "How is that for credible evidence? I will match these popes and councils against any 18th, 19th and 20th century theologians or canonist." He then goes on to give a list of saints, etc, who, according to him, reject the doctrines of the baptisms of blood and desire.
Well, he needs not hold his breath. He has already been exposed as a liar on the internet, where various persons of various religious persuasions have taken up his challenge and given us quotations from the very same authorities and also those from the popes of the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries which show that they believed and taught the doctrines of the baptisms of blood and desire.
I have taken the work of one of these, Matt1918, and customized his offerings to expurgate the unCatholic parts, here.
Here is another document, written by a Michael Malone