WHEN AESTHETICS PREVAILS.
Saturday March 31st. 2001. El PAIS
JUAN A. VELA DEL CAMPO
The four operas cycle with Spanish themes finished with Don
Carlo, which the
Royal Theatre has programmed as homage to the great Italian lyric
composer,
celebrating one century of his death. The idea was brilliant;
the results,
in general, haven’t gone past discretion.
In this Don Carlo has been imposed the visual power from Hugo de
Ana’s
images. In the Verdi year, the Argentinean scenographer’s
aesthetics is to
mark a vision of how to make a Verdi whose audience loves
nowadays. For a
certain kind of audience, of course, in which figures those from
La Scala de
Milan, or Madrid’s Royal. Hugo de Ana’s is a luxurious
aesthetics, of
scenographer. In Don Carlo he used big marble columns as the
following line
and an apotheosis of the figure wisely illuminated.
It’s an aesthetic in between grandiloquence, the composition’s
exquisite
frivolity and the sense of super spectacle. He had, nevertheless,
in Don
Carlo two or three details that enlarges the human and
intellectual
dimension of the global focus: the beginning of the opera, with
a beautiful
drop curtain that subtly leaves the protagonism of space to the
scene, in a
metaphor between the continuity of theatre and life; the Watteau’s
style on
the scene for the veil song, with a dialect between nature and
geometry,
very suggestive in it’s struggle against odds; and, above all,
the complete
scene of the library at the beginning of the second part of the
show, with a
primary attention to the character’s theatrical aspects, in a
sober
decoration and with a grayish light which favored the intimate
Felipe’s II
concession, the conflict between throne and altar in the fore
coming
dialogue with the Great Inquisitor, or the one of the exile or
convent
between the two women after the treason. At that moment the gelid
aesthetic
fades out and in comes the feelings, the drama, the Verdi
passion. And it’s
curious that precisely from the third act, is when the musical
director
Antonello Allemandi brought out the most interior and poetic hues
of the
orchestra, after a first part, concentrated, performing its role
but
anodyne.
The cards were clear from the beginning, in the scene and in the
voices.
Thus, Don Carlos’s first aria and the posterior duet with the
Marquis de
Posa was of such mediocrity that the worst was presaged. Lima
couldn’t find
his place (didn’t found it in the whole night) and Hvorostovsky
was kind of
absent. Later things were getting better, but vocally the opera
couldn’t
quite transmit the outburst that Verdi prints to his characters.
Roberto
Scandiuzzi managed to break the coolness, although from a little
distance,
using a natural and distinguished phrasing in the aria “ She
never loved
me”. Norma Fantini lacked presence and force projecting the
character of
Isabel de Balois, and Carolyn Sebron threw out some sign of
creative
faculty, although the dramatic complexity of the Eboli Princess
lacked in
many instances of a greater definition.
Hugo de Ana was the winner of the night in the final applauses.
The visual
aesthetic imposed itself, for this time to the vocal and musical.
That for
some is a sign of modernity, to others is a tragedy. But that’s
how things
are; let’s not pay too much attention to this.
© Lorena Yussif