|
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY REGARDING MEDICAL MISTAKES |
||
|
What
is meant here by medical mistake is a deviation by the medical
practitioner (doctor, surgeon, anesthetist, nurse, medical lab
or certified midwife, or others) of the normal behavior and to
be accountable of this deviation which incurred damage.
Accountability regarding the incurred damage means medical
responsibility. This responsibility, which could originate
from the "medical
contract" or a medical responsibility, is
determined by the texts of the law. Whatever
was the kind of responsibility, the degree of punishment of
the person having caused the damage is decided according to
the extent of the mistake and the extent of the damage. The
criminal responsibility, whose punishment is detailed in the
criminal law, could concur with the civil responsibility,
whose punishment is a compensation of the damage (physical
damage, financial damage, moral damage), together with the
responsibilities provided for in the special texts regarding
administrative or professional actions such as the punishments
consisting of warnings or disciplinary actions (warning, lay
out, etc.). Nothing prevents the cumulating of these
responsibilities in case of a medical mistake, because all of
them have to do with legal responsibility and are decided
according to the texts of the law. In some cases, only the
legal disciplinary responsibility or the civil responsibility
is taken into consideration according to the extent of damage
incurred. Responsibility
regarding medical mistakes is known since the most ancient
legislation. It was known in the ancient Iraqi legislation: it
has been organized by the legislation of Hamurabi. The Roman law knew it. And
it was detailed in the various Islamic legislation and
schools. It is now well known and clarified in the current
laws. The
Prophet Mohammed said: "He who
seeks medicine without knowing medicine is responsible for the
damage incurred". The late Imam Abu
Hanifa even allowed the sequestration of the ignorant
doctor or medical practitioner and prevented him from
practicing medicine in order to protect people's lives and
their bodies against any damage. In
the modern era, a new branch of law appeared "The Medical Law". Some countries have even
adopted the principle of insurance against non-intentional
medical mistakes committed by medical practitioners. We called
more than once for this kind of insurance in the Arab world in
order to protect the contracted people. Insurance companies in
these countries should lay down the foundations of this kind
of insurance in accordance with the Islamic Share's and with the modern
laws. There
is no doubt that the type of medical practices decides the
kind of commitment on behalf of the medical practitioner. Some
of them if they are not thoroughly completed by the medical
practitioner and reaches a complete result is considered as a
failure to stick to his commitment. This means that he
committed a medical mistake and that he is responsible for the
damage incurred unless there is a proof of a case of force
majeure. For example, the medical lab, the circumcision,
needle shooting according the correct standards, tooth removal, etc. Other types of medical practices require a
minimum of attention and medical effort recognized by the
profession; this is called a commitment to give attention or
to use whatever means available. Here, the person having
suffered a damage has to prove the existence of a damage,
because it is him who claims the existence of such a damage;
the responsible for the said damage could then use the
argument of force majeure. Responsibility
in the medical field is based upon a mistake that should be
proved by the claiming party. The contrary could also be
proven, and this is the basis in the field of responsibility
regarding personal mistake. But, if the medical responsibility
originates from a third-party action or medical objects (i.e.,
surgery instruments, mechanical devices or hazardous
equipment), it is then based on a general rule stating
that it is an assumed mistake whose contrary could also been
proven in many civil and modern laws. Forms of Medical mistake
The
deviation of the medical practitioner could result from a
positive act, such as the injection by an anesthetist of a
dose of drug that could not been supported by the patient,
thus leading to a coma and death. It could also result from
non-respect of the medical secrecy. It could also result from
a negative act, such as negligence and refusal to treat the
patient or inattention. Whatever
kind the deviation is, the forms of medical mistakes could be
summarized as follows. 1. Non implementation of the medical
ethics. 2. Delay in the implementation of the medical
ethics, such
as the complications in case of appendicitis because of a
delay in treatment or in diagnosis. 3. The faulty implementation of the medical
ethics, such
as forgetting a piece of tissue or cotton inside the patient's
body. 4. The partial implementation of the medical
ethics, such
as conducting a surgery without the supervision of an
anesthetist during the recovery after the surgery. The
medical practitioner (surgeon, anesthetist, nurse,…) could not
been directly responsible for the mistake. The institution in
which they work could bear this responsibility of the
committed error, and this is called "the responsibility of the
body in charge", i.e., the hospital (public or private) or the medical
lab are responsible for compensating the damage incurred. Types
of medical damage There
are several types of medical damage: 1. The physical damage stemming from a medical
mistake. It
could be a damage affecting the human soul (lethal physical damage), which is the most severe
one, or it could be a non-lethal damage, which affects the
patient's, body by a permanent or temporary physical
disability. 2. The financial
damage. It is a damage affecting the body financially. It is assessed according to the degree of
financial loss incurred and the lack of gain caused by
inability to work because of an injury. 3. The moral
damage: This is a damage affecting one of the
basic rights of the patient or his interests. It includes
pains, sufferings and every thing that could affect him,
except death, or the rights of those who are affected by his
death. Damages are not only what are in stakes in a faulty medical action (surgeon, nurse, hospital). The patient could incur a damage while the responsibility could be determined in another direction. For example, the damage could be the result of incorrect indications given by a pharmacist regarding the use of a drug, or that the damage is incurred by the patient himself through the non-commitment or non implementation of the correct medical indications.
By
: Professor
Munther Al - Fadhal |