Evaluation
Your speech
at the archaeology convention will be graded based on the following criteria:
|
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|
Application - concepts & principles |
Student does not present “findings”
which show knowledge of the topic.
Student does not discern which knowledge would be appropriate to
present in the context of a convention. |
Student presents some “findings”
which show some knowledge of the topic.
Student does not discern which knowledge would be appropriate to
present in the context of a convention. |
Student picks out “findings” which
show factual knowledge, but lacks interpretation of this knowledge. Student discerns which knowledge would
be appropriate to present in the context of a convention. |
Student picks out “findings” which
show both factual knowledge and interpretation of this knowledge. Student discerns which knowledge would
be appropriate to present in the context of a convention. |
|
|
Application -
Appropriateness |
Few or no “findings” are appropriate
to what one could expect a real archaeologist to find. |
Some “findings” are appropriate to
what one could expect a real archaeologist to find. |
Most “findings” are appropriate to
what one could expect a real archaeologist to find. |
All “findings” are appropriate to
what one could expect a real archaeologist to find. |
|
|
Accuracy |
There are more than 3 inaccuracies in the information
presented about mummies and the work archaeologists do. |
There are 2-3 inaccuracies in the information
presented about mummies and the work archaeologists do. |
There is 1 inaccuracy in the information
presented about mummies and the work archaeologists do. |
Information
presented about mummies and the work archaeologists do is accurate. |
|
|
Compilation - Selection criteria |
Student needs to use selection criteria to decide
which pieces of information are relevant for inclusion in the speech. Either 3 or more pieces of information
should have been excluded and more
appropriate information should have been included. |
Student is developing in use of selection
criteria to decide which pieces of information are relevant for inclusion in
the speech. Either 3 or 4 pieces
of information should have been excluded or
a little more appropriate information should have been included. |
Student uses acceptable selection criteria to
decide which pieces of information are relevant for inclusion in the
speech. 1-2 pieces of information
should have been excluded. |
Student uses strong selection criteria to decide
which pieces of information are relevant for inclusion in the speech. There is neither too much, nor too
little. |
|
|
Compilation - Organization of research |
The speech is neither well organized, nor does it
compile adequate research findings to make strong arguments. |
The speech is well organized, but it does not compile
adequate research findings to make strong arguments. |
The speech is somewhat disorganized, but it
compiles adequate research findings to make strong arguments. |
The speech is well organized and compiles
adequate research findings to make strong arguments. |
|
|
Oral Presentation - Grammar and pronunciation |
Oral Presentation is not in the form of a speech
and student has many errors in grammar or pronunciation. |
Oral Presentation is in the form of a speech and student
has 4 or 5 errors in grammar or pronunciation. or Oral Presentation is not in the form of a
speech. Student has 2 or 3 errors
in grammar or pronunciation. |
Oral Presentation is in the form of a speech.
Student has 2 or 3 errors in grammar or pronunciation. or Oral Presentation is not in the form of a
speech. Student uses correct
grammar or pronunciation. |
Oral Presentation is in the form of a
speech. Student uses correct
grammar and pronunciation. |
|
Top Introduction Task
Process Evaluation
Conclusion Teacher
Pages