CREATION - EVOLUTION CONTROVERSY

DOES CREATION MAKE MORE SENSE?



This has been an area of great discussion even before Darwin published his book on the Origin of Species, which sparked the theory that man evolved from ape. On this page, I intend to put forth a number of areas where evolution does not make the grade. There are just too many unanswered questions. Yet, all fit in well with Creation.

Although evolution was the preconceived notion of Darwin and placed forward as a theory, it has been and still is being taught as fact. Many notable scientists are in agreement with Darwin and place evolution in the realm of science. However, there are many scientists who disagree with Darwin. These scientists are NOT all from the sect labelled as creation scientists; some are atheists, some are agnostics and some are believers from various religions.
This theory has literally given people a freedom to express their gamut of emotions and follow what they believe as acceptable even if it goes against what God requires as is written in the Scriptures.
That is, if we evolved from apes, then we are no better than any other animal. This is so untrue.

So many people over the decades have been led astray by way of theories that have, from the beginning, been treated as fact. Evolution is still just a theory. No transitions have been found to show variants in any of the species as they are classified. Where is the reasoning with evolution? Dinosaurs with bird hip bones transpose into lizards and the dinosaurs who have already "evolved" bones for the purposes required to live on the land are transposed into birds! Humans have supposedly "evolved" from apes, but our skeletons are identical to those of pigs and bears. This does not mean we evolved from pigs or bears.
Ask yourselves, why, if there are so many transitional forms between the past and what we view now, have there been NO fossil transitions found? Lucy has not been proven to be, without doubt.



So many stumbling blocks are placed before people in an attempt to dissuade them from the truth. Many stories that are legends have been labelled as myths. The Resurrection of Jesus is truth, not myth, as is shown in the lives of the apostles. The following statement was heard over radio on the program "World Tomorrow": When a hero or heroine is in the midst of the action, the account is a factual event. As the years pass, he or she becomes a legend. When centuries go by and the facts of the story are hard to believe because they are not seen happening in the present, the legend becomes a myth.
Some fallacies/myths have been lodged into the minds of a few who believe that what they have heard must be true. One such is the Stonehenge monument. To hear people state with sincere conviction that aliens from outer space left this monument as a sign of their visit boggles the mind. This is a falsehood, yet people continue with the debate.



Here is another question to ponder. If the age of rocks are used to determine the age of fossils, then why are fossils of different ages found within the same strata of one era?



Sign Guestbook View Guestbook

View my old guestbook

Makarismos Page of Introduction

BACK



This page is hosted byGeoCities" Get Your Own FREE HOME PAGE

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1