"This present "civilization" has brought to all strata
of society and to all races the following "gifts": restlessness,
dissatisfaction, resentment, the need to go further and faster, and the
inability to possess one's life in simplicity, independence, and balance.
Modern civilization has pushed man onward; it has generated in him the
need for an increasingly greater number of things; it has made him more
and more insufficient to himself and powerless."
-- Julius Evola in Revolt Against The Modern World
* * *
Lately, the term “globalization” and its derivates have become another mantra in the propagandistic arsenal of the politically challenged Bhutanese Establishment. Their attitude towards globalization, like any other geopolitical issue, gives away two well-known maladies of the Bhutanese ostrich policy, namely customary confusion and total dependence. It comes as no surprise that the Bhutanese “elite”, educated and trained in the Western institutions, are bound up with the “liberal democratic” approach to the issue. Much more surprising is that they try to make semblance of their “special position” and “unique path in development”, which is nothing but pitiful endeavors not to fall between two stools which rapidly slide apart – namely, national interests and foreign agendas of the Western political and financial oligarchic groups. The following is to show how we, Bhutanese National Socialists, understand the problem.
* * *
The process of building the "New World Order", at the center of which stands the political-financial oligarchic groups of the West, is called as globalization. The victims of this process are the sovereign states, the national cultures, religious doctrines, economic traditions, manifestations of social justice, and environment - every spiritual, intellectual and material variety on the planet. The term "globalism" in the customary political lexicon means just "unipolar globalism", i.e. not the fusion of the different cultures, social-political and economic systems into something new, as the imposition of Western stereotypes upon mankind, but a critical predominance of the Judeo-Christian mass culture, predatory capitalism, manipulative “liberal democracy”, materialistic ideology, and anti-environmentalist over-production and consumerism.
The type of world under construction was implicit in the history of imperialism and capitalism since the Second World War. The sudden and apparent collapse of Communism as the dominant and official political ideology in Eastern Europe was quickly heralded as proof of the technical superiority of capitalism and liberal democracy, not only over state socialism, but over all other political philosophies. From this background, the moral superiority of the current Western political order was also assumed, not by a process of rational and informed debate, but by simply stating it as axiomatic, as something which did not need to be discussed since it was 'self-evident'. But it has not been enough to dismiss the great world thinkers and leaders in the East and West of much more two millennia as irrelevant to education in the modern world, except in a purely historical sense. It has also become necessary to create a sustained campaign against any manifestation of what might be regarded as 'anti-liberal' or 'anti-modern' thought, to which subscribe National Socialist movements all over the world.
There has been a steady internationalization of capital leading to the growth of the multinational corporations and the international banks to a stage where their power is organized through international institutions - the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the General Agreement On Tariffs And Trade forums and the European Economic Community bureaucracy. The forces of global capital have created political ‘clubs’ such as the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberger Group. We are witnessing before our eyes the emergence of a transnational class. This group has no allegiance to any ‘Western’ state, to any race or cultural identity. It is beyond the structures of international politics as have developed over centuries. The ownership of capital is not the sole entry ticket to membership of this class. “Politically correct” service in politics, management, the arts, academia or in certain professions, will also win admission. However, the fundamental "values" of the transnational class are only economic.
This New World Order was proclaimed the moment the old Eastern Bloc disintegrated. It is obvious that there are peoples who are not part of this Order. The Chinese superpower is not a member of the club; nor is India, and Russia remains unwelcome. The Islamic world cannot be part of a system that directly involves the Zionist dominance. "Minor players" like Bhutan scarcely count at all. This does not mean that these lands are not penetrated by international capital, nor that they don’t contain sectors who would dearly welcome globalism. It does not mean that cheap labor countries are not exploited to provide cheap products – or immigrants to the factories of the home-bases of the NWO. The fact that whole areas of the globe are outside this system means that its claim to political normality is a basic lie. The NWO must thence rely upon the impact of economic globalization and cultural dissimilation of unique national cultures for its power.
In the struggle against the New World Order it is necessary to appreciate the presence of nations and states outside of it, and possibly opposed to it. Not all these forces are fulsome or even conditional friends, though. Still, in the world of realpolitik, facts are facts and it is necessary to surrender to the facts. But the reality is that we have no other choice but to form alliances for the survival of our nation as sovereign political and cultural entity with friends whose geopolitical interests converge with those of us to a certain extent. It is obligatory that we mobilize our ideological weapons to win allies where we can, and to disintegrate or damage those structures imposed upon any people by the New World Order. We must weaken this system. We must encourage armed neutrality against alien blocs, and support - even actively - any regime bullied by the New World Order.