November 22, 2000 - Hollywood
Reporter
Trona Pinnacles to host Burton's 'Apes'
Three hours north of Los Angeles, down a dirt road heading
toward Death Valley, sit more than 500 rock formations poking out of a
dried-up desert lake bed -- just what director Tim Burton wanted for his
latest movie.
Known as the Trona Pinnacles, the site will play host
to 20th Century Fox's production of "Planet of the Apes" during the winter.
The studio has carved out a July 4 release date for the film starring Mark
Wahlberg, Tim Roth, Helena Bonham Carter and Michael Clarke Duncan.
Between shooting at the Pinnacles and Lake Powell at the
Glen Canyon National Recreation Center on the Utah-Arizona border, "Apes"
will employ two of the Southwest's most desolate and increasingly popular
filming locations used to resemble other worlds. Hawaii might serve as
a third location for the shoot.
"We were looking for sites with water that didn't have
any vegetation, which is kind of a tall order -- they usually come hand
in hand," said Robin Citrin, the movie's locations manager. "We also wanted
natural geological forms and architecture. Just finding sand dunes with
a horizon line and nothing in it was not as interesting to (Burton) as
the Pinnacles."
The Trona formations, well-known among tourists traveling
to Death Valley, are tufa rock spires as high as 140 feet that were formed
underwater 10,000-100,000 years ago when the area contained lakes. The
site was classified as a National Natural Landmark more than 30 years ago,
said Peter Graves, resources management specialist at the Bureau of Land
Management's Ridgecrest field office.
"The pinnacles look eerie on a lake bed and protrude upwards,"
Graves said. "They're very rare. They definitely have a look that's out
of this world."
The rocks' featured role in "Apes" is not a first. They
were used in Paramount Pictures' "Star Trek V: The Final Frontier" in 1989,
Buena Vista's "Dinosaur" this year and a recent episode of MTV's "Road
Rules." Remember the "ER" episode that had George Clooney wandering through
the desert? That would be the Trona, Graves said.
The Bureau of Land Management has laid down a few strict
rules for production companies using the Pinnacles, ranging from not disturbing
the vegetation to protecting the habitat of the endangered desert tortoise.
Note to "Apes" film crews and cast: Anyone caught harassing a desert tortoise
could face a $50,000 fine and/or a year in jail.
Crews wrapped night action scenes for "Apes" at Lake Powell
last week. The lake's Utah side was home to the original 1968 "Apes" movie,
but the Arizona side was used this time.
If not for the hordes of summer tourists, Lake Powell
could be another desolate planet, with its sheer canyon walls, narrow passages
and combination of sandstone and water.
Notable movies to film near the lake and in the nearby
town of Page, Ariz., have included 1994's "Maverick" from Warner Bros.
and 1996's "Broken Arrow" from Fox, said Steve Ward, a spokesman for Lake
Powell Marinas and Resorts.
About one-third of the DreamWorks feature "Evolution"
is scheduled to shoot in Page from Thanksgiving through Christmas, said
Don Wygal, the movie's assistant production office coordinator. Scouts
needed a barren, New Mexico-like setting, and Page made the cut. "We needed
a place to film where we could look in any direction and see nothing,"
Wygal said.
--- Chad Graham
Tuesday, November 28, 2000
- LA
Times
Scrappy Miramax Disappears on 'Yards' Marketing
By PATRICK GOLDSTEIN
Director James Gray knew his movie "The Yards" was in
trouble when he arrived at the Miramax film's premiere party at the Writers
Guild last month and discovered that the usually sumptuous catering spread
consisted of bad finger sandwiches and Martinelli sparkling cider. But
Gray had already suspected something was wrong when he and Mark Wahlberg,
the film's star, went to a word-of-mouth screening Miramax held in New
York several days before.
"It was just me, Mark and the seven beautiful girls
he brought," says the 31-year-old director. "They had a seat roped off
with Harvey Weinstein's name on it, but he never showed up. But the so-called
premiere in L.A. was really humiliating. The place was half-empty, and
no one from Miramax showed up. I saw someone the next day who said, 'Geez,
that was maybe the worst studio premiere ever.' "
While sister company Dimension Films has enjoyed teen
smashes with "Scary Movie" and "Scream 3," Miramax has had a rocky year
at the box office, with "The Cider House Rules" being the studio's only
bona fide hit over the past 12 months. Five years ago, Miramax's once fabled
marketing machine would've jumped all over "The Yards," a gritty drama
with a cast featuring three hot young actors--Wahlberg, Joaquin
Phoenix and Charlize Theron--as well as such respected Oscar-worthy elders
as Ellen Burstyn, James Caan and Faye Dunaway.
But instead of giving the film--a grim story of corruption
and family loyalties--a splashy send-off, Miramax released it last month
in 150 theaters without any TV ads or even a street-poster campaign. Greeted
by mixed reviews, the film quickly died, grossing less than $1 million
in six weeks of release. Gray contends that Miramax gave up on the film.
Miramax counters that it strongly backed the film, but that without widespread
critical support the studio had no choice but to cut its losses and move
on.
Believe whom you want, but one thing stands out here:
Movie dramas, once the launching pad for acting careers and the mainstays
of Academy Award season, have become an endangered species. It's one reason
everyone says there's such a weak Oscar field this year. Having lost a
bundle on expensive star vehicles that didn't play for young moviegoers,
studios have radically cut back on drama production, especially ones like
"The Yards" that don't have crowd-pleasing endings (like "Erin Brockovich"
or "Billy Elliot").
Miramax knows the pitfalls all too well, having failed
to find an audience for such dramas as "Music of the Heart," "Guinevere"
and "A Walk on the Moon." Miramax's treatment of "The Yards" also reflects
a change of priorities at the company, which is moving away from quirky
independent films to movies like "Bounce," a drama marketed as a date-night
movie that could've been made at any Hollywood studio.
For Director James Gray, Movie Is a Personal Story
Gray's script, co-written by Matt Reeves, was originally
at Fox Searchlight, but the studio put it in turnaround after a series
of executive shifts. Miramax quickly stepped in and picked it up. The movie
was especially personal to Gray; much of the story was inspired by an incident
involving his father, who was indicted in a bribery scandal in New York
City involving a company that supplied electronic parts for subways.
The honeymoon with Miramax was short-lived. The studio
gave the director a generous $17.7-million budget, but Gray and the strong-willed
Weinstein (who didn't respond on the record to Gray's charges) were at
odds over almost everything else. Gray says Weinstein made "every major
decision from beginning to end. It's all top down, starting with him."
To get Weinstein to approve the casting of singer Steve Lawrence in a minor
role, Gray had to guarantee the studio his salary against the days it would
cost to re-shoot the Lawrence scenes if they didn't work out.
Gray finished the film in September 1998, but it took
months to hold two test screenings: Miramax says Gray delivered his director's
cut late; Gray says Weinstein was unavailable to attend the screenings.
Finally in May 1999, Weinstein went over the re-shoot pages with Gray,
who recalls with a laugh that "Harvey, spitting crab meat at me, kept yelling,
'I'm the master of the invisible cut!' " Weinstein gave Gray money to do
re-shoots in return for Gray, who already owed Miramax another film, agreeing
to do an additional movie.
After the re-shoots, Gray says Miramax only gave him four
days to integrate the new footage into the picture before the studio held
another test screening. It went reasonably well, but audiences still found
the film--then at 2 hours plus--dark and slow-paced. Weinstein reacted
by having Gray cut the film down to 1 hour, 23 minutes so it could be sold
as a thriller. The new version tested even worse, so Gray was allowed to
restore it to its eventual 1-hour-and-45-minute running time.
Along the way, Miramax says, Gray went nearly $7 million
over budget, largely due to re-shoot and post-production costs. Gray, for
example, hired and fired two composers before agreeing to use Howard Shore.
By January of this year, when Weinstein came down with what Gray calls
"his mysterious Kremlin leader illness," the film was still in limbo.
Then Gray caught a break. One of his producers showed
the film to Cannes Film Festival President Gilles Jacob, who fell in love
with it and insisted on debuting it at the festival. A pair of GQ editors
who saw the film also liked it. Buoyed by the positive reactions, Miramax
quickly got the film to Cannes. However, the screenings were a disaster;
the trade reviews were terrible, and the movie was shut out at awards time.
It sat on the shelf until this fall, when Miramax initially planned to
only release the film in three cities.
Shortly before the film's Oct. 20 release, a new burst
of preview-screening enthusiasm earned the film a 140-screen release. But
the studio never supported the expanded release with any TV ads.
The filmmakers argue that most studios would've spent
the marketing dollars to support the film, either to cement its relationships
with the film's stars or because the added visibility would eventually
result in additional home video and DVD sales. But Miramax is notorious
for ruthlessly cutting its losses on films that don't catch a wave; having
taken in more than $15 million in foreign pre-sales on the movie, the studio
was unwilling to risk throwing good money after bad.
Miramax insists that it didn't abandon the film.
"We all loved the movie," says Mark Gill, president of
Miramax Los Angeles, who oversaw the film's marketing campaign. "Unfortunately,
we got shellacked by the critics and we didn't get the kind of word-of-mouth
we needed to make it work. We would've run TV spots, but we could never
get a spot that tested well."
But "Yards" producer Nick Wechsler, who also produced
two current dramas--"Quills" for Fox Searchlight and "Requiem for a Dream"
for Artisan--argues that Miramax didn't give the film a fighting chance.
"Both of those films have difficult and disturbing themes, yet both Fox
Searchlight and Artisan have spent the money to support them," he says.
"I think Miramax has evolved into a more mainstream studio. And Harvey
has moved past the point where he has the energy or need to be the kind
of P.T. Barnum figure who can create a market for a movie even where there
isn't one."
Miramax executives acknowledge that Weinstein was often
unavailable, first because of his illness, then because of his involvement
in Democratic political campaigns. But they say the studio never interfered
with Gray's vision. "From Day 1, James always got what he wanted," says
Miramax executive vice president Jon Gordon. "We're all disappointed in
how the film did, but we believe in James and wouldn't hesitate to make
another movie with him."
But would Gray, who now owes the studio two more movies,
make another film at Miramax?
"I will because I have to," says Gray. "But believe it
or not, I'm not bitter. I got to make the movie I wanted to make. And Harvey
was initially supportive. It just would've made a big difference to me
and to the actors if Harvey had acted as if he was proud of the movie and
judged the film on its merits, not just on its salability."
Sunday, November
26, 2000 - LA
Times
SOSOCAL / YOU ARE HERE By MARK EHRMAN
THE OCCASION: The 14th Carousel
of Hope Ball, Barbara and Marvin Davis' every-other-year bash at Merv Griffin's
Beverly Hilton to benefit The Children's Diabetes Foundation.
* * *
THE CONTRIBUTORS: "Honorary
Chairman" Bill Clinton fails to appear as promised, limiting West Wing
representation to Rob Lowe and Gerald Ford, but big names and deep pockets
are everywhere. "We came to support the Davises because our families were
friends," says Tori Spelling, showing rich-scion solidarity. In addition
to the $1,000-and-more per-plate donation, the gala holds a silent auction
the size of Macy's. "No one's leaving without a major dent in their
pocket," says Mark Wahlberg, top bidder on trips to Maui and the Caribbean,
for a total of $14,100. The crush of celebrities is so thick that,
after showing off the engagement rock given her by television writer-producer
Chris Henchy, Brooke Shields excuses herself, saying, "I gotta go wipe
my face down." She needn't worry. Once everyone is seated at their tables,
the lighting is dim enough that the only visible complexion belongs to
Michael Jackson.
* * *
THE MAIN EVENT: With lame duck
off the menu, once the introductory speeches are dispensed with, the stage
is given over to undiluted entertainment. Host Jay Leno infuses Clinton's
video message with unintentional deadpan hilarity by introducing it with
a Monicagate innuendo. Performances by Charlotte Church, Toni Braxton and,
especially, Ricky Martin, get the assembled millionaires up and shaking,
while the raffle--in which Joe Pesci wins an Aero bed, Pierce Brosnan an
Audubon Society clock, Jennifer Love Hewitt a foot massager and Merv Griffin
an ab slide roller--keeps the laughs coming. "If there's anything rich
people love, it's free stuff," Leno cracks. Indeed, Dustin Hoffman not
only wins a nifty jerky smoker/yogurt maker but also makes off with two
pairs of overstuffed goody bags. "What an amazing night," says Rob Lowe,
himself the gleeful recipient of one of Leno's as-seen-on-TV gadgets. "How
many places can you go, do something to help kids who need it, see Ricky
Martin and get a microwave egg cooker?"
* * *
WHATS THE SCORE?
Celeb Quotient: To get this
many A-listers under one roof, you usually have to give them awards.
Wow Factor: Gala provides top-drawer
entertainers. And with $6 million rolling in for diabetes research, the
Davises can afford to keep the preachy-speechy stuff to a minimum.
Food: Merv's serviceable three-course
champagne and filet mignon feast sates the appetites of the famous and
wealthy, but what about the poor PETA types?
November 24, 2000 - ABC
News
Keeping Cool As the Grinch
Jim Carrey’s Costume Was So Hot, Set Was Refrigerated
By Stephen Schaefer
Nov. 24 — If Hollywood F/X guru Rick Baker has his way,
actors get claustrophobic and sweaty — and sometimes downright neurotic
— when they don his costumes for films.
Baker’s intricate, convincing work can currently be seen
in Dr. Seuss’ How the Grinch Stole Christmas, and he’s hard at work creating
authentic ape costumes for director Tim Burton’s Planet of the Apes remake,
which is due out next May.
Sampling the Goods
Baker says figuring out how to clothe the Seussian oddities
in Grinch was harder than doing the apes. “Not only did we have more people
to do for the Whos, we didn’t know what the hell they were,” Baker relates.
The Whos, those pleasant, joyous characters who anger the sour Grinch with
their holiday singing, were made up to look angelic, yet cartoonish.
Grinch has received much attention for the physical (and
likely the emotional) discomfort its star, Jim Carrey, endured, including
thick yellow contacts and a heavy bodysuit. Let’s hope the apes fare better.
“[For] almost everything I do,” Baker says, “the
first test is on myself. I did the same thing on The Grinch. I wore the
suit all day, videotaped it, and looked at what I thought worked and didn’t.”
Carrey, Baker claims, set a record for an actor wearing
full appliance makeup: 90 days of filming. “I love makeup, and there’s
no way I could sit for 90 days without going nuts,” he admits. In order
to prevent Carrey from passing out from heat exhaustion, “[The crew] refrigerated
the soundstage. All the Whos had wool suits and padding. We had to wear
our winter clothes.”
Saving Planet Simian
Mark Wahlberg is going to be as naked as the censors
allow for the highly anticipated Planet of the Apes redux, but as far as
the film’s ape characters are concerned, it’s going to be Baker’s show.
Apes have always been good for Baker, a five-time
Oscar-winning makeup maven (for An American Werewolf in London, Harry and
the Hendersons [his favorite], The Nutty Professor, Ed Wood, and Men in
Black) who promises to outdo himself with the new Apes.
“I’ve been doing apes since I was a kid,” Baker, who also
worked on Gorillas in the Mist and Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord
of the Apes, notes.
Baker tells Mr. Showbiz that he respectfully terms the
beloved 1968 Planet of the Apes original “a landmark makeup film,” but
he rightfully dismisses its simians as “almost laughable today.”
Burton’s new version, which began filming in a tiny Arizona
town earlier this month, is being planned as a franchise. “The Planet of
the New Millennium,” Baker laughs. By constructing several breeds of simians,
“We’ve taken it to a level far beyond what’s been done,” he claims. “We’re
trying to make something as real and as expressive as possible, and I think
we’ve done it.
“They’re still biped apes, but they resemble the real
animals more than the first ones did and are so much more expressive. There
are something like 500 apes.”
The outdoor filming in Burton’s new film could cause additional
dilemmas. “There is a heat factor for the apes,” Baker concedes. “The gorillas
wear black and it absorbs the heat.”
Some of those handcrafted apes will be portrayed by Michael
Clarke Duncan, Tim Roth, Spike Jonze, and former Merchant-Ivory poster
girl Helena Bonham Carter, who has the honor of filming an ape-human love
scene with Mark Wahlberg.
“I needed a year [to make the costumes] and [20th Century
Fox and Burton] gave me four months … and it turned into five,” Baker says
with a smile.
“I just got a new script with 30 more characters,” the
bearded effects maestro mentions casually. “Let’s see, 530 costumes in
five months? You do the math; we need to lie down.”
As for the possibility of him working on a sequel to one
of his biggest hits, Baker, who does only one film at a time, nods: “They’ve
been calling me about Men in Black 2.”
November 17,
2000 - NY
Daily News
Those Aren't Fighting Words By Mitchell Fink
This is why they call it gossip: I heard the following
story yesterday about Mark Wahlberg taking a swing at director Brett
Ratner the other night at the Buffalo Club in Los Angeles. According to
the source, the star of "The Yards" blew up after Ratner supposedly made
a "suggestive" remark about Wahlberg's date.
Ratner didn't return fire, the source said, opting instead
to become a peacemaker when the manager of the club threatened to throw
them both out. By the time the smoke cleared, the story continues, Wahlberg
and Ratner had settled matters amicably.
Good dish, but a little over the top, according to Ratner's
rep, Melissa Cates. The incorrect part: That punches were thrown. Cates
insisted there were no fisticuffs. "They had words about an ongoing joke,
a stupid inside joke," said Cates, who declined to elaborate. "Brett said
something. Mark got upset. Mark, the manager and Brett all
talked.
And then they said, 'Let's forget it.' "
Wednesday November 15, 12:17 pm
Eastern Time - Yahoo
Biz
Gold's Gym - Venice - The Most Famous Gym in the World
Will Celebrate With Celebrity Members and Invited Guests for its 35th Anniversary
Party And Welcomes Kevin Looney, One Man Walking Across America to Fight
Cancer! - Double Celebration! - Thursday. Nov. 16th 7:00 P.M.!
WHAT: GOLD'S GYM VENICE, known as ``The Mecca of Body
Building'' will host a spectacular party in honor of its 35th Anniversary.
This catered event will be a glamorous celebration of fitness and health.
It will concurrently celebrate Kevin Looney, one man waking across America
to fight pediatric and adolescent cancer! Looney's trek is sponsored by
Gold's Gym and he will arrive just in time to celebrate in grand style!
WHO:
Superstars and gym rats will rub elbows and flex their party muscles at
their favorite fitness facility.
WHEN:
Thursday, November 16th, 2000.
WHERE: GOLD'S
GYM VENICE
358 Hampton Drive, Venice, CA
TIME:
7:00 PM until 10:00 PM
For media clearance contact Bordeaux
International 818.205.9673
Celebrity members lending support include:
Tony Danza
Ted Danson
Mary Steenburgen Ray Liotta
Carl Weathers
Marcus Allen
Hulk Hogan
Lou Ferrigno
Gabrielle Reese Roland
Pickinger
Gregory Hines
Dennis Hopper
Bart Conner
Jimmy Walker
Mark Wahlberg
Bruce Jenner
Ellen Barkin
Andrew Dice Clay
Chuck Norris
Ving Rhames
Mike Piazza
Lawrence Hilton-Jacobs
Greg Louganis
Nadia Comaneci
Keanu Reeves
David Lago
Danny Nucci
Brian Littrell
Patrika Darbo
Leighanne Littrell
Kane Picoy
Julianne Morris
Rachel Winfree
James Caan
Kimiko Tanaka
Richard Lawson
Paul Stanley
Valeria Mazza
Tony Pierson
Denzel Washington
Robert Duval
Your Coverage Is Invited.
SOURCE: Gold's Gym
Monday November 13 03:15 AM EST
- Yahoo
News (Hollywood Reporter)
Lurie, DreamWorks lock up 'Castle' By Beth Laski
LOS ANGELES (The Hollywood Reporter) --- After the critical
success of Rod Lurie's "The Contender" for DreamWorks, the studio is in
final negotiations with the film critic-turned-filmmaker to direct the
psychological drama "The Castle."
Robert Lawrence will produce the $50 million- $60 million-budgeted
project, which is being targeted for a mid-March start.
Robert Redford and Mark Wahlberg are in talks for
lead roles, sources said.
Written by newcomer David Scarpa with a rewrite by Graham
Yost, "Castle" revolves around a court-martialed three-star general who
is sent to a military prison and unites the prison population to create
an army dedicated to taking down a corrupt warden.
DreamWorks acquired and distributed Lurie's political
thriller "Contender," which he also wrote.
Lurie struck a seven-figure deal this year with DreamWorks
to rewrite and direct the comedy "Clink Inc." for ImageMovers. Described
as a cross between "Working Girl" and "The Shawshank Redemption," the project
is about an imprisoned female Wall Street investment banker who uses her
knowledge of the corporate world to change life behind bars and makes the
prison run efficiently (HR 5/24).
Lurie, reached via e-mail, said he had no comment. He
is repped by the Agency for the Performing Arts' David Saunders and attorney
Peter Nelson.
Updated: 11/13/00 - Variety
'CASTLE' KEEPS D'WORKS BUSY
Wahlberg also approached to co-star By CHARLES
LYONS
Film critic-turned-scribe/director Rod Lurie ("The Contender")
is in final negotiations to helm DreamWorks drama "The Castle."
In the meantime, Lurie flew to London over the weekend
to meet with Robert Redford, who he hopes will assume one of the pic's
leads. But the actor is by no means committed to the pic yet.
DreamWorks has also met with reps for Mark Wahlberg,
hoping to interest the actor in the film's other lead. But Lurie and Wahlberg
have yet to meet and no negotiations have begun.
Robert Lawrence, formerly partnered with George Clooney,
is on board to produce via his Robert Lawrence Productions shingle. Pic
is expected to go before cameras prior to next year's potential strikes.
Pic, rewritten by Graham Yost ("Speed") from an original
pitch and script by David Scarpa, centers on a five-star general (perhaps
Redford) who is convicted of a capital crime. Sent to the military's only
maximum security prison (known as the castle), the general turns the convict
population into his own 1,200-man army and threatens to take the prison
by storm. Wahlberg, if his deal closes, would play a young pilot
who is the key to the struggle between the general and the warden of the
prison.
DreamWorks originally nabbed the Scarpa pitch in September
1998. Studio's execs Walter Parkes and Paul Lister have been shepherding
the development of the project since.
Lawrence recently served as one of the producers on "Rock
Star," penned by John Stockwell and starring Wahlberg and Jennifer
Aniston. Pic, directed by Stephen Herek and formerly titled "Metal God,"
is due to be released by Warner Bros. on April 13. Wahlberg recently
starred in James Gray's "The Yards," in release from Miramax Films.
DreamWorks recently released Redford's "The Legend of
Bagger Vance" and "The Contender."
Reps for Wahlberg and Redford could not be reached
for comment.
Wahlberg is repped by Endeavor. Redford and Yost
are repped by CAA. Lawrence is repped by Steve Briemer at Bloom, Hergott,
Diemer and Cook. Lurie is repped by David Saunders at APA and attorney
Peter Nelson at Nelson, Felker, Levine and Dern.
November 10,
2000 - London
Telegraph
Shades of Scorsese
The Yards marks out young director James Gray as one
of the most interesting film-makers around says Andrew O'Hagan
The Yards 15 cert, 115 min
INTERESTING artists often go back to the same basic material
again and again. They may paint the same lilies, but the results are different
and fresher each time.
This is especially true when it comes to depictions of
childhood. Virginia Woolf wrote the same story all her life, or rewrote
it - a constant, amazing revision of how things looked from the nursery
at Kensington Gate. I like this sort of thing, and it is one of the elements
that make me like The Yards, a new film from 31-year-old James Gray.
In Little Odessa (1994), Gray's first feature film, a
young killer called Joshua goes back to New Brighton, to the Russian-immigrant
community of New York where he grew up. His mother is dying, his father
is changeless, and Joshua gets caught up in troubles old and new. The Yards
is more or less the same plot. Leo Handler (Mark Wahlberg) is a
petty criminal, the likeable, quiet sort, who took the rap for his friends
when they stole a car. He comes home from prison and his mother is ill.
He is very close to her and he wants to stay out of trouble.
Frank Olchin, a relative, played with fearsome command
by James Caan, is in charge of a group that has the franchise for running
the railway network in Queens. These are the yards of the title - riven
with corruption, floated on brutality. It is a place where ambitious young
thugs thrive in alliance with corrupt city politicians.
Leo goes to work there in the shadow of his cousin Willie.
He is drawn, at the same time, further and further into a network of loyalties,
a trail of betrayals, and as his loved ones sicken, so does he. Willie
at first seems to be the kind of guy that Leo would like to be - he has
money, he has looks, he has a seemingly healthy family. But the film is
also about the way people such as these get trapped by their reputation,
how they are undone by not being what they seem to be.
The relationship between Leo and Willie is one of the
most interesting I've seen on screen for a while: they are shadow-brothers,
they are differently damaged, and they are engaged in a struggle that can
leave only one man standing. Gray may be the most promising male director
of women since George Cukor. At the beginning of the film, at a party for
Leo's release, we get to see Ellen Burstyn, Faye Dunaway and the newly
luminous Charlize Theron being busy and compelling around one another,
adding depth and tenderness to every scene they're involved in.
There is something of Scorsese in these domestic scenes,
but Gray allows a life to the women that is more lifelike, and less Italian:
very quietly, very skilfully, it is the women who are running things. Burstyn
is a perfect study in the pain of disappointment; she says little, but
says a lot.
The film has a very odd texture, a very suitable, yellowish,
Polaroid feel, which seems to create intimacy and strangeness at the same
time. When the camera lingers over the railway yards, you feel that Gray
is showing you something crucial about his characters, and about a kind
of life that goes on at the edges of our vision. This is his major skill:
he is a teller of stories, similar stories, which gain both their newness
and their depth from the director's own way of seeing, which is another
way of saying that Gray is among the most interesting directors around
now.
He is less sure about endings. The Yards squanders a terrible
amount of its perfect atmosphere on winding up the plot. I don't know if
the studio has anything to do with this - they often do - but the film's
ending forces Leo to become all evangelical and definite about things when
his major strength hitherto was in his blurry weaknesses.
Leo's tangled loyalties, his jangled nerves, conveyed
so well in the film by Wahlberg, suddenly become clear and steely,
and the action is unbelievable. The brilliant gloom of this film cannot
afford to give way to the dullness of a bright ending: Gray should have
cut the last 15 minutes. Consolation, perhaps, lies in the thought that
Gray will fix this problem the next time he visits the subject, which he
is bound to do, in the obsessively revisiting mode that is common to his
kind of interestingness. |