On Christ Betrayed & The Victory Dance of the Modernist Prostitutes
Statement on the Laurentine Double Cross & Apostasy
By Lúcio Mascarenhas, Bombay
http://www.geocities.com/livrant/laurentinian_apostasy.html
In the past few days, Bombayites have been confronted by an extraordinary series of statements and writings purporting to be "newsreports". We have a Triumphalist statement by the Chief Prostitute of Roman Modernism in Bombay, Ivan Dias "celebrating" his success in seducing three seminarians back to their vomit; what is more astounding is that the viciously anti-Christian rag, that misses no opportunity to insult and misrepresent Christianity and to glorify Indian paganism (Hinduism), the Times of India, has sought to lend its "moral support" to Mr. Dias! "Cardinal" Ivan Dias, Apostate & Roman Modernist Antibishop of Bombay lights the lamp in homage to the demon Ganpati before his idol; note the "Om", the Hindu syllable that is the cry of the demon Shiva while in coitus, made in flowers at the base of the idol.
|
But let us inquire into the facts of the present case.
Four seminarians at the St. Pius the 10th Seminary at East Goregaon rebelled against the gross paganism and apostasy that was sought to be instilled in them; were reprimanded for not cooperating and joining with other seminarians in the official apostasy and were accused of being "Lefebvrists", to which they replied to their inquisitor-persecutor, none other than the "venerable" (sic!) Ivan Dias that they were not even aware of Lefebvre!
A few days latter, the disgruntled seminarians were put into touch with Lefebvrists in Bombay and shifted their allegiance to that organisation, which sent them on to its Australian seminary.
The four wrote their testimonies of their experience in the Bombay Seminary and these testimonies and writings against the formal apostasy have been published by the principal Lefebrist organisation, the SSPX, on its website for Asia, at sspxasia.com See
- http://www.sspxasia.com/Newsletters/2004/Jan-Jun/Indian_Seminaries.htm
Testimony of the Dissident Bombay Seminarians: Indian Seminaries — Are They Still Catholic? - http://www.sspxasia.com/Newsletters/2003/Jul-Dec/Hinduism_at_a_Glance.htm
Lourenco de Sousa: Hinduism At A Glance - http://www.sspxasia.com/Newsletters/2003/Jul-Dec/Scandalous_Ecumenism_with_Hinduism.htm
Lourenco de Sousa: Scandalous Ecumenism With Hinduism
Cut a few years later. We do not know what has occured in the interim. What we know is that a couple of years or so later, three of the four have decided to defect back to the same people from whom they had fled in disgust in the first place.
Let us remember certain other facts:
- The sect from which they fled to join the SSPX has a record of violence, intimidation, seduction and recourse to any means whatsoever to gain control over people and brainwash them;
- The SSPX, a vicious sect in its own right, does not usually go out of its way to retain control over people who no longer care for its ideology.
I quote my informant verbatim:
Stella maintained that the cost of the return ticket, Sydney-Bombay-Sydney, about Rs.45,000 (more costly, being purchased in India, i.e., outside the country of origin of the journey) was to give her brother a chance to be with his gravely ailing father for a month and then return to the SSPX seminary. When asked why the ticket could not be purchased in Australia at about half the cost, with Lawrence being reimbursed in India, she never got back.When I spoke to a young man who purported to be a priest in the city district I reside in, he claimed that the SSPX had refused to pay Lourenco and company their airfares back to Bombay. I pointedly asked him what logical reason is there for the SSPX to bear their airfares, to which he had no reply.
Stella had the audacity even to come for a SSPX Mass to hoodwink the old ladies, and succeeded.
It is when the widow claimed her money back because she had never given it for Lawrence to return to the new Church that Stella replied that the money had been given on charitable grounds.
Lawrence arrived in Bombay on December 29, 2005, without giving the slightest hint to the superior of the SSPX Seminary in Australia that he was not going to return.
Shortly after his returns, news of Lawrence's doublecross leaked out. A delegation of five SSPXers called on Lawrence on 18 January on basis of a well-informed report that Lawrence had planned to desert and had already established contact with a retired Bombay auxiliary bishop with whom an appointment had been slated from Australia itself. When confronted with this information, Lawrence let the cat out of the bag and had to admit his plans.
Two days later, i.e., January 20, the two other seminarians slipped out of the seminary premises and only then did Fr. Peter Scott realize the great betrayal by all three. He was so good as to have said that had the three seminarians told him that they had differed with the seminary teachings, he would graciously have relieved them and paid their fares to India.
At the meeting on January 18 in Lawrence's home in Pantnagar, the father was moving around and even went out for a walk.
Mind you, on joining the SSPX, the four seminarians had taken an oath to Catholic tradition before The Blessed Sacrament.
Another person informed me that Lourenco, who learned traditional Catholic practises such as Gregorian chant, in the SSPX seminary in Australia, is now "teaching" this to youth in St. Dominic Savio's church, Ghatkopar. The irony cannot be underlined enough: Gregorian chant was one of the Catholic devotions that was abandoned as part of the Vatican II reforms, to which Lourenco has once again defected!
While we know that the airfare for Lourenco was obtained by fraud and deceit, there is no mention of the source of monies for the tickets of the remaining two.
A few days before Lourenco suddenly disappeared from the SSPX's seminary in Australia, he and the two other double-crossers accousted the fourth, Gregorio Noronha, in an effort to persuade him to join them. He flatly refused.
What do we make of the charge of "brainwashing" levelled against the SSPX? We know that the four had no connection with the SSPX before they rebelled; that they are grown-ups who are fully capable of thinking for themselves. As such, they deliberately choose to throw in their lots with the SSPX. Nobody compelled them to do so. The charge of "brainwashing" is rubbish and not worthy of being made by a sensible man. It is in fact evidence of the desperation in which the Prostitute Dias finds himself.
It is certain, however, that the SSPX would have sought to inculcate into the four its own ideology in full, and no one in his senses could object to that, this being the normal procedure of any and every organization. When a sensible person joins some organization, he must expect to be subject to efforts to lead him further into the ideology of that organization. It is only the insane who would expect otherwise. There is no reason to believe that either Dias or the three Doublecrossers are insane (except spiritually, obviously!) but it is a sign of their utter dishonesty that they make this infantile charge against the Lefebvrist movement!
All of this brings us to the heart of the present matter. Why did the three doublecross? What made them do it? Nostalgia for the vomit they had spurned? Memories of pleasures of the harlot's house? All that may be true. However, where the Greatest Mafia in human history is concerned, we know that they deal in robbing and stealing souls, by hook or by crook. This is a sect that has historically thrown money to corrupt and buy souls to its perverted ideologies. This is the truth of Roman Modernist Protestantism, just as it is true of every form of Protestantism!
Only a fool will fail to recognize this truth!
But let us consider the matter further. What does this celebration of harlotry mean? Why does the Prostitute Ivan the Despicable fear that the Doublecrossers will cross him again?
It is logical that the Doublecrossers are unfaithful and unstable people. They have no ideology, no shame, except that of selling themselves, their souls, to the highest bidders. Who will be fool enough to repose his trust in them, that having once being bought, they will stay bought? It is well that Dias trembles and takes the precaution of putting a bunch of watchdogs on his purchases. However, watch as he may, the doublecrossers will doublecross him too once again.
With every criminal, getting away with crime becomes a habit. Today, you may exploit it for your own ego's triumph, but you can never, never be secure in their loyalty.
Finally, I must comment on the fact of Dias' desperate effort to represent the despicable and knavish doublecross of these three as the end of Catholic recusancy. It is a vain hope. Catholicism is from God, and all that the Devil's minions do will not be able to overcome and destroy it, despite all the fond delusions that Mr. Dias may permit himself!
I request — nay, demand! — our glorious and triumphant Lourenco de Sousa and his illustrious cohorts Antonio Rodrigues and Antonio de Afonso to kindly provide me a group photograph of themselves worshipping the demons Ganapati, Shiva, Visnu, Krisna, etc. in reparation for having denounced their worship by members of their sect and especially by their fellow-seminarians acting on the orders of the Antivaticanum and Ivan Noite, Antibishop of Mumbai!
Further reading:
- http://www.geocities.com/prakashjm45/descent-of-modernism.html
Pedigree Of The Liberal Protestant Heresy of Modernism & How It Entered The Catholic Church. Chronicles the pedigree of the Modernist heresy. When you read this page and its evidence, you will understand the connection between Protestantism and Scientism, Modernism, Liberalism, Evolutionism, Darwinism, Homosexuality. You will be able to understand where people like the Anglican "bishop" Gene Robinson come from. - http://www.dimmid.org & http://www.monasticdialog.com
The DIM/MID organisation, an umbrella group of monks and religious adhering to the Roman Modernist sect, dedicated to unifying world religions, demonstrates the degree of the Roman Modernist sect's apostasy. - http://www.geocities.com/prakashjm45/voltivaspornographies.html Graphic Evidence of the Piety & Modesty of the Antipope John-Paul II
- http://www.geocities.com/prakashjm45/aarticontroversy.html
Idolatry of the Antipope John-Paul II - More Pictoral evidence of Idolatry of the Antipope John-Paul II:
- http://195.202.176.112/freinademetz/Bilderbogen/ca_ca_62.jpg: Presentation of Aarathi
- http://195.202.176.112/freinademetz/Bilderbogen/ca_ca_63.jpg: Profound Adoration
- http://195.202.176.112/freinademetz/Bilderbogen/ca_ca_33.jpg: Liturgical dancing
Statement of Ivan Dias: Official — The Lefebvre Movement In Bombay
March 22, 2006Page Source: http://www.archbom.org/official.htm.
Three years ago, four students of St. Pius X College in Goregaon left the Diocesan Seminary to join the schismatic movement of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. They were sent to a seminary in Goulburn (Australia), where they were systematically indoctrinated against the Second Vatican Council, the "modernist" Popes John XXIII and his successors, including Pope Benedict XVI (Pope John Paul II being accused of "silent apostasy"), the New Mass introduced by Pope Paul VI, the Divine Mercy devotion, the Catholic Church�s ecumenical and inter-religious dialogue, etc. They were further told that the Holy See is vacant and that the validity of the ordinations of bishops and priests after Vatican II, and the Sacraments performed by them, was to be seriously doubted. In fact, the Sacrament of Confirmation was conferred again on the four seminarians conditionally (i.e. if perchance they did not receive it validly before), and if a priest joined the movement, he would have to receive the Sacrament of Holy Orders again conditionally.
Disillusioned by the above, three of the four aforementioned seminarians have decided to return to full communion with the Catholic Church, notwithstanding the pressures being exerted on them by a small group of diehard Lefebvrists in our Archdiocese. I welcomed them fraternally and, after interviewing them individually, have granted them permission to receive the Sacraments. Their future will be duly monitored by the Archdiocesan Team of Bishops.
This consoling turn of events confirms the fact that many members of the Lefebvre movement are returning to the Catholic fold. Already in 2002, Lefebvrian Bishop Licinio Rangel of Campos, Brazil, together with his flock sought for and was granted communion with the Vicar of Christ, despite the hostile reactions of the movement leaders. There are many seminaries the world over which receive candidates to the Sacred Priesthood who have left the movement and wish to continue their training in the Church of Rome.
I deem it opportune to inform the faithful in the Archdiocese that the members of the Lefebvre movement and their Masses — though valid, as are those of some other non-Catholic Christian communities — are not in full communion with the Holy See. May I also recall that, since 2001, for the benefit of those who desire to attend the Tridentine Latin Mass of St. Pius V — so much hyped by the Lefebvrists in opposition to the post-Vatican II Mass introduced by Pope Paul VI — I have authorised its celebration on the first Sunday of every month at the Church of Our Lady of Victories, Mahim.
Some of the problems inherent to the Lefebvrian movement were mentioned in my Official which appeared in The Examiner on February 11, 2002. The observations made therein are still valid. I request the Clergy, Religious and the Lay Faithful in the Archdiocese to pray that the misguided members of the Lefebvre movement may soon return to full communion with the Church of Rome under the guidance of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI.
Ivan Cardinal Dias
Archbishop of Bombay
March 17, 2006
Church crisis resolved?
Three out of the four seminarians who broke away from the Catholic Church have renewed their faith and the Church has welcomed their return
By Manoj R. Nair, Bombay Mirror, Times of India Group of Newspapers. March 28, 2006. Page Source: http://www.bombaymirror.com.In February 2002, a circular from archbishop Cardinal Ivan Dias, the head of the Catholic Church in Mumbai, suggested the existence, in Mumbai, of a small breakaway group from an orthodox and ex-communicated movement.
In that official in the church weekly Examiner, the cardinal warned his flock from attending masses conducted by priests from the traditionalist Lefebvre movement which had rejected reforms made in the Catholic Church in the 1960s. Some of the reforms paved the way for inter-religious dialogue and working for unity with other Christian denominations.
Since that circular, not much has been heard about the little-known movement though small groups loyal to the movement continued to hold their own masses in rented halls and in the privacy of their homes in Mumbai. However, the latest official from the Cardinal suggests that the small crisis in the Church has blown over.
That crisis was precipitated by the quitting of four students from St Pius X College, Goregaon, the premier Catholic seminary in the city. The students left the school and joined the movement that had been started by a French Archbishop, Marcel Lefebvre. The students subsequently attended a seminary run by the Lefebvre order. Now, it emerges that three of those seminarians have decided to return to the full embrace of the Catholic Church. In last week�s official, Dias welcomed them back into the Church.
The Lefebvrist movement was a fallout of the second Vatican Council held during 1962-65. The council ushered in major changes in the Church, including the abandoning of the old Tridentine or Latin mass and adoption of inter-religious dialogue. Since then, most churches shifted to local languages. However, those who opposed the council and the modernism that it brought in, flocked to Lefebvre who set up his seminary to train his own priests. Father Tony Charanghat, spokesperson for Cardinal Dias, said that the number of Catholics in Mumbai who subscribed to the views of Lefebvre was minuscule. "To accommodate those who wanted the traditional mass, the Church permitted the Tridentine mass once a month at the Church of Our Lady of Victories, Mahim provided they gave an undertaking that they believe in Vatican II and the new order of the mass," says father Tony.
"Further, when we submitted to the archbishop the first list of the names of those who wanted to attend the Tridentine mass, there were only 26 names in it."
But the traditionalists, who claim that they are more than a hundred, say that the Mahim mass is not what they want. "The mass at the Mahim church is offered on condition and was started to side-track the issue," says Narcissus Neeff, a resident of Bandra.
According to the Catholic Church, the new movement was declared schismatic and Lefebvre, who is now dead, was excommunicated by the Pope in 1988. However, traditionalists like Brian Michael, a resident of Bandra, rejects the Church�s claim that the movement is a breakaway group. He says that the Society of St Pius the X, the official name of the Lefebvre group, still acknowledges the Pope as the head of the Church. "Rome has said that we are not in formal schism with the movement and has permitted us to attend their masses," he claims.
Neeff, who prefers the old Latin mass, says that their group cannot be called a breakaway group because the Vatican had said that the issue was an internal matter of the Church. "This indicates that they do not recognise a schism. At the moment, negotiations are still going on with the Vatican for a reconciliation," he says. According to Father Charanghat, the issue was just about attending a Latin mass. "They are not aware of the full implications of Lefebvre�s point of view which even suggested that the new mass was influenced by Protestants and should not be accepted. Further, they close the door to inter-religious dialogue and working for unity with other Christian denominations," he said, adding that the priests who have returned will be monitored by a team of bishops.
Statement by Lúcio Mascarenhas
From: Lucio MascarenhasDate: Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:59 am
Subject: Goan Apostates' Double Cross in Bombay
I categorically deny the assertion that "Persons who attend only the SSPX Mass know before Almighty God that they remain in the bosom of the Church of Christ." This assertion has no foundation in the Catholic faith. Lefebvrism is as foul a heresy as the Antichurch, of which it asserts itself to be a part of, and in communion with.
The situation created by Lourenco de Sousa and his two other cohorts (Antonio Rodrigues & Antonio de Afonso) is interesting. They were misguided into joining the heretical, anti-Catholic Lefebvrist movement, instead of being guided to authentic Catholicism. They publicly pronounced against the Apostasy of the Antichurch. Today, they have just as publicly betrayed themselves to the same wolves they had previously denounced.
Nothing has changed since they had first fought against Ivan Dias. Dias has not changed his beliefs and practices as denounced by Lourenco. Therefore, today, Lourenco owes the public at large an explanation for his actions.
Dias� statement is the public victory celebration of a brazenfaced prostitute. It does not concern me in the least.
Lourenco, on the other hand, owes the public an explanation. By reconciling with Dias, he has now implicitly repudiated all that he had previously affirmed against Dias. Evidently, today, Lourenco believes that Hinduism is a lawful religion and that one can obtain salvation through it, and that persons who claim to be Christians may attend Hindu religious and liturgical services without peril to their souls and eternal salvation.
The claim of the Prostitute that the three (Lourenco et al) had been "brainwashed" by the Lefebvrists is a brazen lie typical of the hypocrites and Pharisees that constitute the hierarchy of the Antichurch. The undeniable fact is that the four seminarians (Gregorio Noronha remaining with the Lefebvrists) had problems with the Apostate Church, a result of the remnant of their Catholic Faith clashing with the new, Prostitute Religion of Vatican II and the Five Beasts (John XXIII, Paul VI, John-Paul I & II, Benedict XVII) even before they came into contact with the Lefebvrists, and that their objections were raised when they were not even aware of the existence of the Lefebvrist movement.
I underline this once again: The Prostitute Ivan Dias� statement has no value. People at large have a right to a clarification from Lourenco and Company. In the absence of an explanation, one is compelled to certain conclusions:
- Hinduism is a lawful religion; and
- That one can obtain salvation through it; and
- That persons who claim to be Christians may attend Hindu religious and liturgical services without peril to their souls and eternal salvation.
Regards.
Lúcio
N.B.: The text of this message may be viewed in its original formatting at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goancenter/message/944
---Original Message---
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:41:34 -0800 (PST)
In his earlier "Official" dated February 11, 2002 on the Lefebvrian movement Cardinal Dias had not stated anything about the departure of his four seminarians to the SSPX
The leader seminarian, Lawrence D'Souza, held several conferences before he left Bombay in 2002 when he read from unorthodox teachings imparted in the Bombay seminary from papers distributed by professors in the classroom, to the consternation of the faithful present.
In the January-June 2004 Newsletter of the SSPX District of Asia, three out of four seminarians have recorded testimonies under the title "Are Indian Seminaries still Catholic?" amd these may be accessed on sspxasia.com at: http://www.sspxasia.com/Newsletters/2004/Jan-Jun/Indian_Seminaries.htm
Lawrence himself, in his testimony, has likened Cardinal Dias to the Devil. These testimonies are still on the internet.
I cannot understand how these three seminarians can now eat their words.
According to an Indian traditionalist in Australia, till two years ago, these seminarians were ultra-traditionalist and Lawrence had brought to tradition in Australia some difficult persons.
The new sacramental rites have been written to meet the new "ecumenism of reconciled diversity" and are not Catholic rites at all. The pre-Vatican II CHurch had endorsed only the "ecumenism of return" to the integrity of the Faith.
Two months before Lawrence arrived back in Bombay, on December 29, 2005, Lawrence's sister deluded some gullible old ladies, including widows, to pay for his return air ticket, Sydney-Bombay-Sydney, on grounds that he was coming only for a month to see a critically ailing father suffering from cancer. Lawrence took leave of the Holy Cross Seminary only for a month but, in actual fact, the appointment with the Bombay retired auxiliary, Ferdinand Fonseca, was arranged from Australia itself according to reliable sources in Bombay.
The other two seminarians, Tony Alphonso and Anthony Rodrigues slipped out of Holy Cross Seminary on January 20.
The fourth, Gregory Noronha, the youngest, refused to cooperate with these two when the proposition was put to him on January 11.
When Rev. Fr. Peter Scott, Rector of Holy Cross Seminary, Australia, learned of the betrayal, he told SSPX priests that if these seminarians did not agree with the teachings in Holy Cross he would gladly have relieved them and paid their fares to India.
Within a year of his appointment, Bishop Rifan and his priests have been concelebrating on occasions the Novus Ordo Missae. They have virtually accepted Vatican II.
Erroneous teachings are imparted in 'Catholic' seminaries the world over after Vatican II as recorded in the book, "Are Today's Seminaries Catholic?" by Michael Dupuis, Keith Roscoe, and John Thomson, February 1990, The Angelus Press, Dickinson, Texas 77539.
On the issue of the Holy Mass, Cardinal Ottavianni, theologian to four Popes, had already preceded the Lefebvrists in condemning the Latin original of the New Mass.
The English verson, when compared with the Latin, contains around 400 errors, all intentional as exposed three years by a former member priest of the ICEL which had mandated the English version.
In Mahim, Bombay, the distribution of the Novus Ordo cookie or invalid hosts from the Novus Ordo tabernacle, and not hosts consecrated at the Traditional Mass, to the faithful is mandatory.
Persons who attend only the SSPX Mass know before Almighty God that they remain in the bosom of the Church of Christ unlike those — Cardinal Dias included — who are members of the New Church which endorses an ecumenism of 'reconciled diversity.'
In 1962, on the eve of the Council, the late Cardinal Valerian Gracias of Bombay had revealed to a confidante, the late Edmund J. Fernandes, that a new church would emerge after the Council ! This New Church is very much in place today.